View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:34 am Post subject: Golden Industar as fake Jena Sonnar 5cm :) |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Never seen such strange mutant before Click here to see on Ebay.de
_________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Wow!!
I like ti so much.
Brass and glass, an old way |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1827 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Looks like a fake made from an industar to me.
is it real? _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
I saw one of these on Ebay US a month or so ago, only that one was identified as an Industar conversion in the description, so I guess you couldn't call it a fake, just a curiosity.
Anyway, I thought the Industars were Tessars, not Sonnars. Guess if you are going to pretend it is a Zeiss you can pretend it is a Sonnar. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
newst wrote: |
I saw one of these on Ebay US a month or so ago, only that one was identified as an Industar conversion in the description, so I guess you couldn't call it a fake, just a curiosity.
Anyway, I thought the Industars were Tessars, not Sonnars. Guess if you are going to pretend it is a Zeiss you can pretend it is a Sonnar. |
You could call it a fake, because it's not a Zeiss lens and not even a copy of one, But you couldn't call it a forgery because its not a copy of a real one being passed on as the genuine article.
fakes and forgeries are different things. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Which is intriging me there is that it's noted as M42 lens, whereas it's RF version of Industar... _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|