View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:01 pm Post subject: Sharp and Warm: Canon FD 50mm f1.8 |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
I've had my NEX-5N for about 6 months, but just now got around to trying out my Canon FD 50mm f1.8. These were standard on many Canon AE-1 and AE-1 Program cameras, and there are loads of them around. But WOW! I really like it. It's sharp and has a warmth to it that I really like.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
drjs
Joined: 25 Feb 2013 Posts: 484 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drjs wrote:
Beautiful results. I have a couple copies of this lens and it never cease to impress me whenever I put it on the camera. _________________ Follow me on 500px |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
Sony NEX-5N + Canon 50mm, f1.8
_________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 5994 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
A very good lens with beautiful colour rendering.
Your images are indeed warm and inviting.
My son's favourite lens for his Sony
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
Thanks OH. It is a nice little lens. The warmth makes it especially good for winter shooting where everything tends to lean toward blue (for us northern hemisphere denizens anyway.)
About the only negative with this Canon 50 is that its minimum focusing distance seems about double of that of most other 50mm lenses. Not a big deal considering its defining strengths. _________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
AstroZon wrote: |
About the only negative with this Canon 50 is that its minimum focusing distance seems about double of that of most other 50mm lenses. |
It's not quite that bad - I have about a dozen 50's within arm's reach and most of them labeled to 45 cm, none less than that, and stop there. FD 50/1.8 is labeled to 60 cm and goes slightly under, I'd say to 57-58 cm. So it's 25-30% difference.
PS. 50/1.8 is a beautiful lens, sharp, contrasty, light, and easy to find in mint shape. One of my favorites. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
Gardener wrote: |
It's not quite that bad - I have about a dozen 50's within arm's reach and most of them labeled to 45 cm, none less than that, and stop there. FD 50/1.8 is labeled to 60 cm and goes slightly under, I'd say to 57-58 cm. So it's 25-30% difference.
PS. 50/1.8 is a beautiful lens, sharp, contrasty, light, and easy to find in mint shape. One of my favorites. |
OK, I may have been exaggerating a little - 25-30% sounds about right. Here's another photo taken with it:
_________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Atlasman
Joined: 30 Oct 2013 Posts: 28 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Atlasman wrote:
I like the rendering of the FDn 50mm f1.8. Where it falls short for me is in the long close focus distance; my measure is about 18.5". Here's what it yielded on the A7:
The Pentax 55mm f1.8 M42 on the other hand has a close focus distance of 14"; here what it yielded on the A7:
Color wise, I like the warmth of the FDn 50mm best. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Gardener wrote: |
AstroZon wrote: |
About the only negative with this Canon 50 is that its minimum focusing distance seems about double of that of most other 50mm lenses. |
It's not quite that bad - I have about a dozen 50's within arm's reach and most of them labeled to 45 cm, none less than that, and stop there. FD 50/1.8 is labeled to 60 cm and goes slightly under, I'd say to 57-58 cm. So it's 25-30% difference.
PS. 50/1.8 is a beautiful lens, sharp, contrasty, light, and easy to find in mint shape. One of my favorites. |
Indeed, quite large MFD on that one, never noticed that before. East German 50s have small MFDs: Jena Tessar goes to 35mm, Pentacon MC Auto 1.8/50 goes to 33mm, most Japanese 50s focus down to 45mm.
Great results with this lens, everyone. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57850 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
great success indeed! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|