View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Recently repaired a SUN 200mm f2.8 and it's kinda bubbly.
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
[quote="BeardsAreBest"]Recently repaired a SUN 200mm f2.8 and it's kinda bubbly.
/quote]
I wonder if that's the same lens as one labeled Soligor. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
I wonder if that's the same lens as one labeled Soligor. |
Yes it Looks pretty much identical to the soligor branded one.
Same as this one.
http://forum.mflenses.com/sun-optics-200mm-f-2-8-y-c-mount-t69526.html
except mine is m42. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rybolt
Joined: 13 Sep 2016 Posts: 94 Location: Yellow Springs, Ohio USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
rybolt wrote:
Jupiter 9
_________________ Fuji X and Sony A cameras with many Fuji, Zeiss, Leica and other adapted lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Just got primotar.
mmmmmm....
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
catching the right bubbles, beautiful bubbles is too difficult for me. so I do not attempt to purchase Triplan100(or50). I train with other lenses, so far without success.
projection lens Триплет100/2.8
projection lens Триплет78/2.8
Primotar135/3/5
Last edited by sergtum on Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chris_zeel
Joined: 21 Jan 2013 Posts: 136 Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chris_zeel wrote:
BeardsAreBest wrote: |
Just got primotar.
mmmmmm....
#1
|
which Primotar is this? the 135/3.5? _________________ DSLR: Canon 6D, Canon 400D
SLR: Praktica MTL5, Topcon RE-2, Topcon RE Super, Nikon EM, Chinon CE-3 Memotron, Pentacon F, Zenit 12-XP
Rangefinder: Zorki 4K, Ricoh 500G, Olympus 35 SP, Neoca 2S
Folder: Afga Isolette-I
Compact: Olympus mju-I
AF: Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di LD
Exakta: Meyer-Optik Trioplan 50/2.9, Primagon 35/4.5
M42: Sigma Mini Wide 28/2.8, Auto Chinon 28/2.8, Meyer-Optik Lydith 30/3.5, Pentacon Electric 29/2.8, Mir 1b 37/2.8, Super-Takumar 50/1.4, Meyer-Optik Oreston 50 f/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2, CZJ Tessar T 50/2.8, E. Ludwig Meritar 50/2.9, Meyer-Optik Primotar E 50/3.5, Industar 50-2 50/3.5, SMC Takumar 55/2, CZJ Biotar 58/2, Helios 44 58 f/2, Jupiter-9 85 f/2, Meyer-Optik 85/3.5, Super-Takumar 105/2.8, Accura Super Tc 135/2.8, Pentacon Zebra 135/2.8, Jupiter-11 135 f/4, Chinon MC Auto 200/3.5, Accura Supertel Tc 200/4.5, Soligor C/D Macro+Zoom 80-200/4.5
F-mount: Nikon Series E 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 100/2.8, Nikkor-S 35/2.8, Nikkor-H.C 50/2, Nikkor-H 85/1.8
Topcon: RE Auto Topcor 35/2.8, RE. Auto Topcor 58/1.8, RE. Auto Topcor 135/3.5
OM: Zuiko Auto-S 50/1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
BeardsAreBest wrote: |
Just got primotar.
mmmmmm....
|
Primotar does pretty well in the right circumstances. I too sometimes get those amoebas inside the bubbles. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Primotar 3.5/135...
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hutschi
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 10 Location: Dresden
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2024 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hutschi wrote:
It is an old thread, but there is a new answer:
TTArtisan 2,8/100 M42 is very similar and easy to adapt.
The bokeh is almost the same, the color rendering has a very little more contrast.
IMGP8190 by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|