View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Posts: 147 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
frenched wrote: |
But though it may be a tad long it's quite light. |
Kind of like the Minolta 60-200 and a number of other lenses from that time frame. As others have said, great shots, frenched. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
RnR wrote: |
I think some of the shots are a little soft because of the shutter speed being a little low for some of the images (assuming most of them are at 200mm). #1 is nice and sharp, but its also taken at 1/2000.
I've settled for a Yashica 80-200 ML for landscape purposes. One day I'll get these puppies |
+1
Based on the first image, this lens is pretty sharp, and it can't go wrong with other images except you did this way. Most of the images is not as sharp as the first one so I suspected you got some vibration.
I also mostly shoot primes, but I have few zoom lenses, and I'm sure the FD 80-200 f/4 L can be a bit better than this lens. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1373 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
The other day I saw a Canon lens made collar - 3rdy part actually - for long lenses which could prob. be adapted to the Zeiss zoom.
At ebay there's a bunch of it... (I'm thinking to bring one for the Jupiter 21M 4/200, find the beast heavy enough,
Cheers,
Renato |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Posts: 147 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
RSalles wrote: |
The other day I saw a Canon lens made collar - 3rdy part actually - for long lenses which could prob. be adapted to the Zeiss zoom.
At ebay there's a bunch of it... (I'm thinking to bring one for the Jupiter 21M 4/200, find the beast heavy enough,
Cheers,
Renato |
Renato, one could put a collar on this zoom, but then the collar will interfere with the user being able to access the entire zoom range. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 283 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
RnR wrote:
CBokeh wrote: |
The ironic part is, for as long as the barrel is, I can't figure out a spot to place a tripod collar if I could find one to fit the lens. |
Maybe the Manfrotto 293 'Telephoto Support' could be of use? Just without the strap so you have the full zoom range. _________________ Currently shooting with Fuji X-E2s + Metabones Speedbooster + m42 and CY glass 💕
Cheers, Hasse |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rudolfkremers
Joined: 10 Jun 2014 Posts: 723 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2015-08-08
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
rudolfkremers wrote:
Regarding length/weight, I find its ok as its not super heavy, although it does stick out a fair bit. Its not super great to hang it around your neck and walk around.
I also have the Vario Sonnar 35-70 f3.4, which is a lovely lens:
_________________ https://www.rudolfkremers.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudolfkremers/
https://www.facebook.com/rudolf.kremers
https://www.omni-labs.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rudolfkremers
Joined: 10 Jun 2014 Posts: 723 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2015-08-08
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
rudolfkremers wrote:
Langstrum wrote: |
RnR wrote: |
I think some of the shots are a little soft because of the shutter speed being a little low for some of the images (assuming most of them are at 200mm). #1 is nice and sharp, but its also taken at 1/2000.
I've settled for a Yashica 80-200 ML for landscape purposes. One day I'll get these puppies |
+1
Based on the first image, this lens is pretty sharp, and it can't go wrong with other images except you did this way. Most of the images is not as sharp as the first one so I suspected you got some vibration.. |
It was a gloomy day and I was just messing around, so I ended up compromising on shutterspeed. I din't mind for the art shots though.Sharpness isn't everything.
HOWEVER, I would like to have more control over these decisions, so I ordered a monopod yesterday. I'm struggling with handheld shots at the longer lens spectrum _________________ https://www.rudolfkremers.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudolfkremers/
https://www.facebook.com/rudolf.kremers
https://www.omni-labs.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I have a general impression that many Zeiss lenses quite often have issues with CA?
IQ else wise is superb in most cases. _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
My 5 cents regarding this gem:
[/img] _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
I like the VS80-200 it's my best MF tele-zoom.
I also have a Tamron 70-210SP (#19AH) and the Canon FD 70-210/4. When tested each @200mm on my A7r I was a bit surprised by the results. In order of performance (@200mmm) my copies ran Zeiss clearly first, with the Canon a surprisingly close second. The Tamron, which I expected to beat the Canon and possibly even the Zeiss, was in last place for both sharpness and CA. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Posts: 147 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
RnR wrote: |
CBokeh wrote: |
The ironic part is, for as long as the barrel is, I can't figure out a spot to place a tripod collar if I could find one to fit the lens. |
Maybe the Manfrotto 293 'Telephoto Support' could be of use? Just without the strap so you have the full zoom range. |
Wow! That's something.
Considering that people are saying that the lens is not so heavy, just long, it may do well for me without a tripod mount. I know other people have long complained about the weight of the C/Y 35-70 (which I imagined applied to this longer lens as well) and the 35-70's weight has never bothered me in the least. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frenched
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 395 Location: MD USA
Expire: 2014-06-17
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
frenched wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
I have a general impression that many Zeiss lenses quite often have issues with CA?
IQ else wise is superb in most cases. |
I agree, though I only have/had a few. I guess it was a trade-off when it came to lens design and marketing decisions. CA isn't the curse it once was. These days easily removed in Lightroom with click or two.
I also have a Zeiss Jena Prakticar (Sonnar) 300/4. Awesome lens but the CA is a bit worse. Yet still easy to fix.
rudolfkremers wrote: |
Regarding length/weight, I find its ok as its not super heavy, although it does stick out a fair bit. Its not super great to hang it around your neck and walk around. |
Check out the Black Rapid sling-style straps. I have the RS-5. A little pricey but they're great.
Arctures, very sweet shots!
Hey Renato, post a link to the tripod collar you found if you can. I'd like to see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1373 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|