View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:17 pm Post subject: Zeiss Flektogon 50/4 (Medium Format) assembly question |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Hi!
I recently finished repairing a Zeiss 50/4 for medium format. The aperture was stuck so I disassembled the lens down to the smallest part and assembled it again.
I should say beforehand, that there is no possible way to assemble it wrong. I intently searched for many possibilities but they don't exist, so I can be pretty sure about that. There are different details that can be put only one way and not another, so I got the lens back together and all parts are now working normally, except for one peculiar thing.
The inner aperture drive is working like it should - when turning around, it makes the aperture fully open or fully close. It is limited by its own means.
Next, the aperture ring is connected to the drive with a pin that is protruding from the inner surface of the ring and when you turn the ring, it also turns the drive with this pin.
All in all, it is normal. But the aperture ring has its own limiter. The pin moves inside the cut-off space of the outer lens barrell. It naturally stops after reaching the edge of that space.
And now, what is the problem: The pin is more limited than drive. So when the pin reaches either end, the drive can still move further. So the aperture does not fully close and does not fully open by about one stop.
It can be entirely possible that the lens was originally like this. But I don't know about that because the aperture wasn't working and I couldn't see it.
I have some strange idea that this lens could be an f/2.8 lens instead of f/4, but it is intently limited. It's like some gadgets or cars which characteristics are artificially lowered in order to sell a more pricey model which is basically the same. But could this be possible with lens?
To fix the problem I can just cut off some more space from the lens barrell and the pin will move further (the ring will also go beyond "4" and "22" marks on its scale). But I don't know, is it really the right thing to do, or am I missing something? I will provide photos of the lens if needed.
Oh, forgot to say. There is a small setup piece in the drive that can be moved left or right thus limiting the drive more or less to either side. With it, I can make the aperture open earlier so when the aperture ring hits the "4" digit, it will be fully (or almost fully) open. But at the same time it will lose the ability to close for the same amount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:26 pm Post subject: Re: Zeiss Flektogon 50/4 (Medium Format) assembly question |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
nandakoryaaa wrote: |
I have some strange idea that this lens could be an f/2.8 lens instead of f/4, but it is intently limited. It's like some gadgets or cars which characteristics are artificially lowered in order to sell a more pricey model which is basically the same. But could this be possible with lens? |
No, the diaphragm opens completely for F4.
The maximum and minimum aperture, F4 and F22 respectively, can be adjusted separately. When the screws indicated by green arrows are loosened one turn, the limiters can be adjusted.
Maybe these articles could help you:
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-1.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-2.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-3.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-4.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-5.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-6.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-7.pdf
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/CZJena/repmanczj-8.pdf
http://www.stephenrc.com/flektogon.htm _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:12 pm Post subject: Re: Zeiss Flektogon 50/4 (Medium Format) assembly question |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
The maximum and minimum aperture, F4 and F22 respectively, can be adjusted separately. When the screws indicated by green arrows are loosened one turn, the limiters can be adjusted.
|
Wow, thank you!
Yes, this is the exact drawing of my lens and yes, the limiters can be adjusted that way, but even at the extreme limiter position the aperture still does not open fully. Not because of the limiter, but because of the pin of aperture ring.
The lens is assembled exactly as pictured, everything is right.
I have indicated the pin with the red color and I have also marked with dotted lines how the barrel must be cut in order to allow more movement for the pin. It's a considerably big amount which cannot be achieved with just adjusting the limiters.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
You should not need to do any surgery on your lens for the diaphragm mechanism works as it should. Maybe you have assembled something incorrectly.
Below the pictures of my lens at F4 and F22. Note the positions of the iris blades and the pin you mentioned.
Wide open - F4:
Stopped-down to F22:
_________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
You should not need to do any surgery on your lens for the diaphragm mechanism works as it should. Maybe you have assembled something incorrectly.
Below the pictures of my lens at F4 and F22. Note the positions of the iris blades and the pin you mentioned.
|
Yes, my lens is assembled exactly like yours and there no other way to assemble it. It just would not work at all. I have a big talent in assembling stuff incorrectly but here even I am helpless because there's just no way.
Thank you all who answered because I decided not to mess with the lens, and I will just search for more info. That's a big enigma. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
Below the pictures of my lens at F4 and F22. Note the positions of the iris blades and the pin you mentioned.
|
LOL, I think I have found the answer!
Actually, seeing your pictures helped it!
Everything is right, but I was examining my lens' aperture WITHOUT the rear glass!
It looks like this:
And there is still way for aperture to fully open like this:
But when the rear glass piece is mounted, its opening diameter is already smaller. So with this piece in place you see the aperture as if it was fully open! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Happy ending after all!
Fortunately you did not file the pin stops! _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
Happy ending after all!
Fortunately you did not file the pin stops! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|