View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Kjell: After going back and reading your post again, I've concluded that nothing I have would meet those requirements. Of the several 200mm lenses I have, there is fast, short focus, sharp, small, light, and inexpensive, but not a single lens I have is all of that. I can't speak about Canon or Nikon because I haven't had those. However, among the ones I have, I can offer the following...
Vivitar 3/200 Series 1: Fast and my sharpest, very short minimum focus and excellent build quality. Heavy and not real cheap.
Vivitar 3.5/200 Komine; Good lens, but doesn't perform on Series 1 level.
Sankyô Kôki Komura 3.5/200 Preset: Excellent colors; good sharpness; great bokeh; good build quality; heavy, long minimum focus, and not as easy to focus. Prices vary greatly. Many bladed diaphragm.
Meyer Optik Görlitz Orestegor 4/200: Very good sharpness and bokeh; decent build, sexy name, long minimum focus, inexpensive. Many bladed diaphragm.
Minolta MD Rokkor 4/200: 1st MD version. My most recent purchase. Light, good build, sharp from f/4, Minolta colors. Long focus, prices vary.
Kashimura Dianon 4.5/200: Good sharpness, bokeh, and light, but long. Long minimum focus. Rare, but fairly inexpensive. This lens is probably better than I have given credit. Many bladed diaphragm.
Topcon 5.6/200 RE Auto-Topcor: Light, small, well built, a tad sharper at wide open than Rokkor and minimal CA. Has a reputation of being the least impressive among the highly rated Topcors, but in my experience it is better than that. Long focus. Inexpensive. If it were only faster... _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Kjell: After going back and reading your post again, I've concluded that nothing I have would meet those requirements. Of the several 200mm lenses I have, there is fast, short focus, sharp, small, light, and inexpensive, but not a single lens I have is all of that. I can't speak about Canon or Nikon because I haven't had those. However, among the ones I have, I can offer the following...
Vivitar 3/200 Series 1: Fast and my sharpest, very short minimum focus and excellent build quality. Heavy and not real cheap.
Vivitar 3.5/200 Komine; Good lens, but doesn't perform on Series 1 level.
Sankyô Kôki Komura 3.5/200 Preset: Excellent colors; good sharpness; great bokeh; good build quality; heavy, long minimum focus, and not as easy to focus. Prices vary greatly. Many bladed diaphragm.
Meyer Optik Görlitz Orestegor 4/200: Very good sharpness and bokeh; decent build, sexy name, long minimum focus, inexpensive. Many bladed diaphragm.
Minolta MD Rokkor 4/200: 1st MD version. My most recent purchase. Light, good build, sharp from f/4, Minolta colors. Long focus, prices vary.
Kashimura Dianon 4.5/200: Good sharpness, bokeh, and light, but long. Long minimum focus. Rare, but fairly inexpensive. This lens is probably better than I have given credit. Many bladed diaphragm.
Topcon 5.6/200 RE Auto-Topcor: Light, small, well built, a tad sharper at wide open than Rokkor and minimal CA. Has a reputation of being the least impressive among the highly rated Topcors, but in my experience it is better than that. Long focus. Inexpensive. If it were only faster... |
If we are taking about f4 and slower, I think we should also include any zooms that have similar size and or as good IQ.
Like the FDn 80-200/4L which has picked up some popularity thanks to [url=" Phillip Reeve"]http://www.flickr.com/photos/birnenbaumgarten/sets/72157629349634442/[/url]
I just recieved my Topcor R 200/4 & 300/5.6 lenses and am going to try them out.
I really like my Topcor R 135/3.5 as a walk around lens, no sharpness issues. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I just recieved my Topcor R 200/4 & 300/5.6 lenses and am going to try them out.
I really like my Topcor R 135/3.5 as a walk around lens, no sharpness issues. |
I'll be interested in seeing the Topcor 5.6/300 shots, and also hearing your opinion on it. I have one and have not fallen in love with it. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
I just received my Topcor R 200/4 & 300/5.6 lenses and am going to try them out.
I really like my Topcor R 135/3.5 as a walk around lens, no sharpness issues. |
I'll be interested in seeing the Topcor 5.6/300 shots, and also hearing your opinion on it. I have one and have not fallen in love with it. |
My Topcor R 135/3.5 is my favorite 135mm lens, it's razor sharp wide open, so it will be what I compare the 200 & 300 to.
I was shooting handheld and I was a bit shaky today, but I could tell it wasn't up to the same level as the R 135/3.5 wide open, just how much? I will have to get back to you on that, and it was getting too dark to stop it down much. It felt like it was sharp, but didn't have the resolution the 135 has, oh well, I'll have to revisit the 300.
The R 200/4 was what I was hoping for, immediately I could tell it was as good as the 135, which is to say that it is very sharp from wide open, it will hard not to want it if I need 200mm.
Every time I use my better Topcor lenses, I always get a little sad, Topcon walked away from the camera business, and they were easily one of the top lens makers in the business, as good as Leica and Zeiss.
I really would have liked to have seen what they could do with multi-coated lenses and a modern bayonet mount like Minolta's MC/MD. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7547 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
I just received my Topcor R 200/4 & 300/5.6 lenses and am going to try them out.
I really like my Topcor R 135/3.5 as a walk around lens, no sharpness issues. |
I'll be interested in seeing the Topcor 5.6/300 shots, and also hearing your opinion on it. I have one and have not fallen in love with it. |
My Topcor R 135/3.5 is my favorite 135mm lens, it's razor sharp wide open, so it will be what I compare the 200 & 300 to.
I was shooting handheld and I was a bit shaky today, but I could tell it wasn't up to the same level as the R 135/3.5 wide open, just how much? I will have to get back to you on that, and it was getting too dark to stop it down much. It felt like it was sharp, but didn't have the resolution the 135 has, oh well, I'll have to revisit the 300.
The R 200/4 was what I was hoping for, immediately I could tell it was as good as the 135, which is to say that it is very sharp from wide open, it will hard not to want it if I need 200mm.
Every time I use my better Topcor lenses, I always get a little sad, Topcon walked away from the camera business, and they were easily one of the top lens makers in the business, as good as Leica and Zeiss.
I really would have liked to have seen what they could do with multi-coated lenses and a modern bayonet mount like Minolta's MC/MD. |
Hi, James. How is your Topcor 85? It will be nice to see your photos before I try my own copy. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I haven't used it a bunch, other than to check it after getting it back from the CLA.
Yeah, it's typical Topcor, very sharp wide open, and some CA, much like the RE 58/1.4.
I will get some pics up soon. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7547 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I haven't used it a bunch, other than to check it after getting it back from the CLA.
Yeah, it's typical Topcor, very sharp wide open, and some CA, much like the RE 58/1.4.
I will get some pics up soon. |
I see. Look forward to your photos with the 85. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
Jupiter 21M may be good for you, not very heavy and sharp wide open, the IQ is about 80-90% of my Canon EF 200/2.8 L. The only limitation is the f4, so normally I can't use this lens right before the sunset. Other choices are FD 80-200 f4L if you don't mind zoom lens. This lens actually changed my impression with zoom lenses. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Belcanto
Joined: 17 Oct 2013 Posts: 72 Location: Karlstad, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Belcanto wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Am I the only fool that thinks a heavy long FL lens is a good thing ?
Steadier to handhold and dampens vibration. |
No, I am with you on that one. I had the Rokkor 250/5.6 mirror lens but sold it to fund another lens, reason beeing it became to unstable to
shoot handheld.
Thanks Woodrim, I did have the vivitar komine 200/4 and found it a bit lack luster. Seems to me I should try the topcor.
And how about these 80 - 200mm zooms. If I understand it correct they become bigger but minimum focus distance is shorter.
The canon FL is suggested. Anyone tested the vario-sonnar? _________________ "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."
O. Wilde |
|
Back to top |
|
|
texsport
Joined: 12 Feb 2013 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
texsport wrote:
Vivitar Series 1 200/3 is a good, compact choice.
Texsport |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
the Yashica ML C 4/200mm is a nice compact tele (113,5mm long, 58mm filtersize and 535g) _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
2 from my Topcor R 135/3.5 all on A7r (all uncorrected)
Full size bee shot. https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3905/14885717968_393b184481_o.jpg
Similar shots from the Topcor R 200/4 all on A7r (all uncorrected)
I may have missed focus on this shot a bit, has a some CA.
_________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Am I the only fool that thinks a heavy long FL lens is a good thing ?
Steadier to handhold and dampens vibration. |
I also agree, my heavy Jupiter 21 is very steady in my somewhat shaky hands. It is a pleasure to use actually. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Belcanto
Joined: 17 Oct 2013 Posts: 72 Location: Karlstad, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Belcanto wrote:
Thanks for all the Suggestions. The Topcor 200/5.6 has the looks! The Jupiter 21 is Heavyyyy!
I see the point with weight, or rather momentum. Right now I have three contenders in my mind
- Canon Fd 200/4, Not N-version and not internal focussing.
- Super-Takumar 150/4, Just because its on our local auction site
-Vario-sonnar 80 - 200mm F4, Seems to always get good reviews.
Are there 180mm alternatives??
Kjell _________________ "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."
O. Wilde |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Belcanto
Joined: 17 Oct 2013 Posts: 72 Location: Karlstad, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Belcanto wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200. Stunning lens, sharp as a laser, supremely well built. |
I read in another post about the 28mm hexanon that you held the 200mm Hexanon as one of the best. Does it still hold?
I really like hexanons and has got that one, and the 200/4. Still they couldn't hold up to the cannon fdn200/4 wide open, to be added
- on the m43 G5 camera. Stopped down a little the hexanons got better and the cannon worse!! Still on the G5.
I suppose I have to do some testing too see what works on the X-T1. _________________ "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."
O. Wilde |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Posts: 511 Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200. Stunning lens, sharp as a laser, supremely well built. |
5.6 oder 4.0 ?, because i found only the 4.0 with my search. _________________ Greets
Wolfgang |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 942 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
If you want something compact , I can recommend you the Super Takumar 150/4 . It fits good even small cameras and focusing is a joy.
I have also the Rokkor MD 200/4 version 2 which is quite light . I think less than 500g. It performs well too though focusing is stiff compared to the Takumar. I think that for those long tele lenses the easiness of focusing is an important criterium of choice.
About the Jupiter 21 , it is a very good lens indeed ...certainly made with the same steel used for soviet armoured vehicules.
Almost 1kg ! My Tak 3,5 which is big , weights "only "750g. Focusing is also very long with this soviet beast.
Most of those lenses require some CA correction in PP. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5077 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Do you want something long, heavy and 180mm ?
Try a Sonnar 180mm f2.8 or better a Jupiter-6 180mm f2.8...
Else, Soligor 200 f3.5 or Orestegor 200 _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
I just recieved my Topcor R 200/4 & 300/5.6 lenses and am going to try them out.
I really like my Topcor R 135/3.5 as a walk around lens, no sharpness issues. |
I'll be interested in seeing the Topcor 5.6/300 shots, and also hearing your opinion on it. I have one and have not fallen in love with it. |
I shot it again today, handheld and full support, it's nowhere near as good as my other Topcor lenses, stopping down didn't improve anything. I'll up the best picture.
calvin83 wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
I haven't used it a bunch, other than to check it after getting it back from the CLA.
Yeah, it's typical Topcor, very sharp wide open, and some CA, much like the RE 58/1.4.
I will get some pics up soon. |
I see. Look forward to your photos with the 85. |
I also brought the RE 85 with me, easily my best 85, I really should use it more. Pics to come. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Belcanto wrote: |
Thanks for all the Suggestions.
Are there 180mm alternatives??
Kjell |
How about the CV APO-Lanthar 180. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RAART
Joined: 10 Oct 2012 Posts: 499 Location: Oakville, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
RAART wrote:
How about Mamiya Sekor C 210mm F4 (Medium Format Lens). It is sharper than my other Mamiya Sekor Auto 200mm F3.5 (M42) on DX sensor but the focusing is better on M42 lens. _________________
Camera: Pentax K3
FOR SALE:
Do you have Pentax-A or F or FA primes and like to trade?
Here is the list what I have to trade/sale:
Primes: - Kiron 28mm f2 (C/Y); Vivitar 28mm f2.5 Auto (FD); Minolta MD 50mm f2 (incl. adapter to m4/3); Miranda Auto 35mm f2.8 EC (incl. adapter to m4/3); Miranda Auto 135mm f2.8 EC (incl. adapter to m4/3);
Zoom Lenses:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
another small, cheap and very good option: the Soligor 3.5/180 (you can also find it as Hanimex)
http://forum.mflenses.com/soligorkomine-180-3-5-t7998.html _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tao
Joined: 26 Oct 2011 Posts: 241 Location: Bangkok
Expire: 2015-03-12
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tao wrote:
wolfhansen wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200. Stunning lens, sharp as a laser, supremely well built. |
5.6 oder 4.0 ?, because i found only the 4.0 with my search. |
Ian's was a Topcor "RE" 200/5.6 which was known to be really nice.
Lightshow's was a Topcor "R" 200/4 which was quite scarce.
The one you found was probably a Topcor "UV" 200/4 which was mostly useless on digital.
Back to the topic, currently my favourite 200ish lens is the Sigma APO Macro 180/5.6. Very good if you are ok with the plastic construction. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
tao wrote: |
wolfhansen wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200. Stunning lens, sharp as a laser, supremely well built. |
5.6 oder 4.0 ?, because i found only the 4.0 with my search. |
Ian's was a Topcor "RE" 200/5.6 which was known to be really nice.
Lightshow's was a Topcor "R" 200/4 which was quite scarce.
The one you found was probably a Topcor "UV" 200/4 which was mostly useless on digital.
Back to the topic, currently my favourite 200ish lens is the Sigma APO Macro 180/5.6. Very good if you are ok with the plastic construction. |
I agree, that was probably the UV model - stay away. An RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200 can be had cheap if you're patient enough. I'd love to try the R 4/200, but don't see them show up. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
texsport wrote: |
Vivitar Series 1 200/3 is a good, compact choice.
Texsport |
I reported on this but didn't recommend it since it didn't meet the UP requirements as I understood them. I wouldn't consider it a compact due to its rather large diameter and weight. However, nothing I've used ha equaled it in performance.
Here's a wide open from last evening in setting sun. NEX-5N and Series 1 3/200:
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|