View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:01 pm Post subject: Question about canon 0.95 |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Can i use Canons 0.95 on my Canon 5D Mark II? And if i can, wich adapter do i have to get?
Kind regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
no, 0.95 is rangefinder lens Leica screw mount, even if you can mount it with adapter working distance will be limited to close up works or even more worst. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Attila wrote: |
no, 0.95 is rangefinder lens Leica screw mount, even if you can mount it with adapter working distance will be limited to close up works or even more worst. |
oh no That was really sad to hear, but a huge thanks for your kind help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Never mind if you want to sell it I'll give you £20 _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
tammyb wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
no, 0.95 is rangefinder lens Leica screw mount, even if you can mount it with adapter working distance will be limited to close up works or even more worst. |
oh no That was really sad to hear, but a huge thanks for your kind help! |
One inexpensive solution is second hand sony nex-3 , ~150 USD and you can use it, even first NEX-3 has pretty good sensor. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Perhaps this article is interesting for those who intend to use a super fast lens on a digital camera:
http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/F-stop-blues _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I saw several shoots with this lens from my friend who is one of the best photographer what I know on Sony A7R , this is not Noctilux.. I don't see point to pay for this lens $$$ an 1.4 any lens what is fit into your camera will serve you same well or even better. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
Attila wrote: |
I saw several shoots with this lens from my friend who is one of the best photographer what I know on Sony A7R , this is not Noctilux.. I don't see point to pay for this lens $$$ an 1.4 any lens what is fit into your camera will serve you same well or even better. |
+1
This lens never convinced me to buy
If you want to shoot f0.95 lens, you can try the new Chinese Mitakon 50/0.95 (around $700). I heard some good things about this lens. And if you're really into manual focus lenses, you must love mirrorless cameras. Even an old, cheap one is very convenient and efficient enough. If you see any cheap NEX-F3 (less than $200) I highly recommend to take it, you won't be regret. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
I like images from the Canon 50/0.95 lens on a Sony Alpha 7:
http://www.paulmarbrook.com/sony-a7-canon-50mm-f0-95-dream-lens/
Does someone has informations about the microlens angular efficency of the Sony alpha 7 cameras?`It seems DXO does not perform further measurments - or don´t puplish them.
Up to know I did not find exacter microlens informations about this new camera- and I am very happy with my EOS 5D.
This article is nearly 4 years old, directly afterwards was some discussion, but it slowed down. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pavko
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 216 Location: PL
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
pavko wrote:
FL 58/1.2 shares very similar character to that. I don't know whether one could distinguish which is which in blind test. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I found the Konica Hexanon 1.4/57 to be markedly superior to the Canon 1.2/58, and a lot cheaper. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Thanks a lot to all of you!
why i want this lens? Well, i fell in love with the bokeh I almost only use old lenses this Days, cause i love the artistic feeling i get with them.
And i really appreciate all your help. I love to photograph, but i'm really bad with all the mecanic talk )
Yes I love mirror lens, but I still don't have any, really would love to buy Rubinar 300 but that seems impossible This Chines Mitakon 50/0.95 - does that fit the Canon 5D Mark II?
I must look up the other one you tiped me about, Konica Hexanon? I will look that up
Thanks a lot! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
inombrable
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 545 Location: Salamanca, Mexico
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
inombrable wrote:
Hi tammyb,
Maybe you got a bit confused, the other members were talking about mirrorless camera , not mirror lenses.
These cameras like the NEX, A7, etc let you use almost any manual lens available with the proper adapter.
Also, the konica lens Ian was referring to won't let you reach infinity with your canon camera unless the adapter has a glass element, which can affect IQ. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
inombrable wrote: |
Hi tammyb,
Maybe you got a bit confused, the other members were talking about mirrorless camera , not mirror lenses.
These cameras like the NEX, A7, etc let you use almost any manual lens available with the proper adapter.
Also, the konica lens Ian was referring to won't let you reach infinity with your canon camera unless the adapter has a glass element, which can affect IQ. |
Hahahaha, well thank you ) I thought you talked about mirror lenses, now I know _________________ My website - www.imageorama.com
My blog - www.imageorama.blogg.se |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
ZoneV wrote: |
Does someone has informations about the microlens angular efficency of the Sony alpha 7 cameras?`It seems DXO does not perform further measurments - or don´t puplish them. |
I am not aware of any more updated information than that from DXO, but perhaps this article will be of some help:
http://www.ronscheffler.com/techtalk/?p=224
Digital sensors generally do not work very well with very inclined rays so performance is usually bad with fast wide angle lenses originally designed for rangefinder cameras. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
...
Digital sensors generally do not work very well with very inclined rays so performance is usually bad with fast wide angle lenses originally designed for rangefinder cameras. |
I know that very well, but this can partly be fixed with shiftet microlenses.
My interest is more for the super fast lenses. I am thinking about the Sony 7 cameras, but still I miss information how good they work with very fast lenses f/1.2 and faster.
My 5D loose 0.45 f-stop on f/1.2 lenses, EOS 7D 0.9 f-stop (DXO date). So I suppose that several current DSLR cameras loose ~1 f-stop or more at f/0.95. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrano
Joined: 15 Feb 2013 Posts: 855 Location: UK
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cyrano wrote:
The A7 series don't perform well with wide angle rangefinder lenses, the wider the angle the more pronounced the shortcomings O believe. But with slr lenses they are pretty much spot on. You probably know that. _________________ A whole bunch of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
The A7 series are great for legacy glass, if you really want to use that lens, hold on to it till you get a camera that can use it.
Most of my glass buying has been to get the glass, not to get glass that matches a body, because I might use a body for 3 years, and the glass for 10x that. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
I also think that the Sony A7 is one of the best platforms to use with legacy lenses.
One of the things that made me choose the Sony A99 instead of the A7 was the larger A99 body that balances better with large lenses and is more comfortable to handle. However, many people prefer the A7 precisely because it is smaller.
The A99 has internal stabilization in the body, but in practice this does not work well because adapters usually come with chips for emulating 50mm lens. It's a shame that Sony does not allow manually setting the focal length.
A thing that is unique in the A99 is the fully articulated LCD. In the other FF cameras like Sony A7, Canon 5D and 6D, and Nikon D600 and D800, the LCD is fixed, or just tiltable (Sony A7).
The high point of all current FF Sony models is the electronic viewfinder, EVF. I know this is a controversial subject, but, oh boy, the EVF is what the doctor ordered for using with manual lenses!
There are a few cases where the OVF may have some advantage over the EVF. For example, in an outdoor scene with lots of light (on the beach, for example), you SEE better with the OVF, but you PHOTOGRAPH better with the EVF! In almost all other cases, you SEE and PHOTOGRAPH better with the EVF.
Advantages of the EVF:
1. WYSIWYG
2. Review directly in the viewfinder.
3. All information can be seen in the viewfinder.
4. Real-time view of the effects of setting white balance, exposure compensation, etc.
5. Focus accuracy not subject to misadjustment of mirror, focus sensors and ground glass.
6. Image always bright even with small apertures (F11, F16, F22) or high-magnification macro lens.
7. 5X or 10X zoom for ultra precise focus adjustment.
8. Focus peaking for manual focusing in video recordings.
Finally, I would like to emphasize a feature that the Sony A99, A7 and most Canon cameras have, but the A7r does not have: the so called Electronic First Curtain. The EFC is extremely efficient to avoid shutter-induced vibration. Try shooting with an ultra telephoto lens, or a macro lens with 1:1 magnification, using a shutter speed of, say, 1/15s, even on a tripod, and you will understand how important the EFC is. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|