View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:56 pm Post subject: testing my lenses part 125 - Tamron 28-70mm/3.5-4.5 59A |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
Samples taken with Olympus E-M5
_________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
There's a lot to like about this lens, it's sharp, has good colour and nice bokeh. The flower shot is excellent. I like Tamrons, perhaps I'm biased? _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 524
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
There's a lot to like about this lens, it's sharp, has good colour and nice bokeh. The flower shot is excellent. I like Tamrons, perhaps I'm biased? |
I've come to the conclusion my favorite mf zooms are all Tamrons. _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
One day I'll have to find out which is the better lens SP 35-80 01a or 35-70 09a...they both give good results so haven't bothered before. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1304 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
One day I'll have to find out which is the better lens SP 35-80 01a or 35-70 09a...they both give good results so haven't bothered before. |
I couldn't really tell the difference on my pentax Kr between the 01A and the later 35-70mm the 17A. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
norland
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
norland wrote:
The 17A is a good lens (and seems to be more robust), but the 01A is sharper. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013 Posts: 476 Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
norland wrote: |
The 17A is a good lens (and seems to be more robust), but the 01A is sharper. |
I agree. Had them both at the same time and giving away 17A was hard decision as it's fantastic lens...however 01A is simply better. For my copies difference was more significant on the long end, while on short end they were both pretty equal.
I gave 17A to a friend of mine and decided I did good thing as my friend end up with fantastic 17A and I was left with superb 01A .
All in all I would not buy 01A while having 17A if I didn't came across great deal for it. (I bought 17A for about £20 which wasn't a bargain and bought 01A for £15 which was ).
Cheers
Mateusz _________________ Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Nice ones, I have the lens too, it's good on NEX+Lens turbo too _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
PhantomLord wrote: |
norland wrote: |
The 17A is a good lens (and seems to be more robust), but the 01A is sharper. |
I agree. Had them both at the same time and giving away 17A was hard decision as it's fantastic lens...however 01A is simply better. For my copies difference was more significant on the long end, while on short end they were both pretty equal.
I gave 17A to a friend of mine and decided I did good thing as my friend end up with fantastic 17A and I was left with superb 01A .
All in all I would not buy 01A while having 17A if I didn't came across great deal for it. (I bought 17A for about £20 which wasn't a bargain and bought 01A for £15 which was ).
Cheers
Mateusz |
...and the comparison goes on, which is better 01a or Minolta 35-70 f3.5 If I had a A7 (or whatever) would like to compare my lenses with crops to see the difference. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
17A or Minolta 35-70 / 3.5 Macro ? It's close, but the Minolta is the better lens. I'd like to try this 59A though. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|