View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Layer-cake
Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 11:28 am Post subject: Minolta 53mm F2 should i buy?? |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
was at a camera dealer today and I came across the first 53mm Minolta I've seen. from reviews it seems to be a nice lens but I couldnt find relative prices for it as it isn't a common lens!
he wanted $40, is this decent? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
Probably a relative of 55/1.8 I had once on SR-1. It had unusual looks for a rokkor - silver nose, shiny 8-blade aperture. I don't think it was something special IQ-wise. I'd get only if I was bent on collecting every rokkor in 50mm range. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
You should be able to buy much more valuable lens with $40 in your hometown. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Layer-cake
Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
yeah that's what I thought, there aren't stellar reviews and its not really sought after as rare lens. I have a 50mm F2 and love it but I don't really need it.......too many 50's already
Calvin;) funny story from the same guy I bought for $30 a Carl Zeiss ultron 50mm 1.8 it does have a finger print on the inner front element so I need to figure out how to get it out but I was still pretty chuffed with myself!! and a Minolta SI 28mm 2.5 for $30 so it was a good day......not sure why he wanted $40 for the 53mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 521
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
An underdog Minolta 50 I like that can be had for peanuts is the 55 1.9. It was only a kit lens for a couple of years and there is talk of substandard coatings but it's the smallest of their 50s and is quite sharp. _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
In fact, at least the earlier, knurled focus ring version of 55/1.9 is exactly the same lens as 1.7, the only difference is the size of the aperture plate. I've always like both better than 58/1.4. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Layer-cake wrote: |
yeah that's what I thought, there aren't stellar reviews and its not really sought after as rare lens. I have a 50mm F2 and love it but I don't really need it.......too many 50's already
Calvin;) funny story from the same guy I bought for $30 a Carl Zeiss ultron 50mm 1.8 it does have a finger print on the inner front element so I need to figure out how to get it out but I was still pretty chuffed with myself!! and a Minolta SI 28mm 2.5 for $30 so it was a good day......not sure why he wanted $40 for the 53mm. |
You should enjoy that Minolta 28/2.5, $30 is a great price for what you get. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Layer-cake
Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
Indeed, from first impressions I am rather impressed with the 28mm, its leagues above the Vivitar 28mm I have!!
I am just rather surprised on how many minolta lenses there are that I have never heard of!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 521
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
Minolta was always prolific in their lens line and they were around for a lot of years. It seems like the ones you've never heard of are all the 60s stuff. The most interesting "I never noticed it existed" one for me (even though it was on the Rokkor files and I missed it) is that 18mm F9.5. Talk about a lens that would appeal only to collectors!
Click here to see on Ebay
I remember reading that during the height of the SLR dream, I think MAXXUM era, they were manufacturing 30,000 lenses a month. They were always tooled up as well as diverse!" target="_blank">Click here to see on Ebay _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|