View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 234 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:01 pm Post subject: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
Has any company made manual (that is: mechanical coupled) APS-C lenses?
I use a M4/3 camera and am enjoying the "half-frame" Olympus PEN-F lenses that I own. However I haven't been able to find any film era lenses from another company designed for something less than full frame.
Correct me if I am wrong, but APS-C cameras came about after lenses became auto focus without aperture rings, etc. So are there any mechanical lenses that were designed for APC-C that might be adapted?
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Dont know about any APS-C film lenses.
Here's assuming you don't yet know about the modern manual leses for APS-C by https://ttartisan.myshopify.com/collections/aps-c-lenses and https://7artisans.store/ _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:59 pm Post subject: Re: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
Has any company made manual (that is: mechanical coupled) APS-C lenses?
I use a M4/3 camera and am enjoying the "half-frame" Olympus PEN-F lenses that I own. However I haven't been able to find any film era lenses from another company designed for something less than full frame.
Correct me if I am wrong, but APS-C cameras came about after lenses became auto focus without aperture rings, etc. So are there any mechanical lenses that were designed for APC-C that might be adapted?
Regards, C. |
I have a couple of APS film lenses (note these were never APS-C but covered all three APS formats - the choice between formats being one of the claimed advantages of APS) These minolta vectis lenses are highly electronic so as to be effectively useless, unless you buy a rare & expensive adapter. (I can't justify £300 for £20 worth of lenses).
FWIW I do also have some more modern digital APS C lenses which are totally manual (my APSC ultra wides all seem to fall into this class). Not what I'd call 'mechanically coupled' but using an aperture ring on the lens - the camera doesn't really need to know the aperture, it just does stop down metering. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 234 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 4:30 pm Post subject: Re: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
I have a couple of APS film lenses (note these were never APS-C but covered all three APS formats - the choice between formats being one of the claimed advantages of APS) These minolta vectis lenses are highly electronic so as to be effectively useless, unless you buy a rare & expensive adapter. (I can't justify £300 for £20 worth of lenses).
FWIW I do also have some more modern digital APS C lenses which are totally manual (my APSC ultra wides all seem to fall into this class). Not what I'd call 'mechanically coupled' but using an aperture ring on the lens - the camera doesn't really need to know the aperture, it just does stop down metering. |
To clarify, I am excluding screw drive AF lenses. In the strict sense of the word these are mechanically coupled and can be used with a "dumb" adapter, but in my view these were never really intended to be used as manual focus lenses. For one the focus ring is usually very narrow and second, without the screw mechanism on the camera the focus ring is tends to be quite loose (not to mention having a short throw; I prefer a long throw on my focusing ring).
DConvert, could you give me an example of one of the modern digital APS-C lenses you are thinking of?
By the way, best wishes to all!
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
titrisol70
Joined: 14 Dec 2021 Posts: 149 Location: State of Denial
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
titrisol70 wrote:
APS came way after autofocus, and by that time lenses were 35mm already.
A few makers still sell APS-C manual lenses, e.g.
https://www.samyanglens.com/en/product/product-srch.php?category=C
https://www.venuslens.net/product-tag/aps-c/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 8:38 pm Post subject: Re: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
DConvert, could you give me an example of one of the modern digital APS-C lenses you are thinking of?
Regards, C. |
I was thinking of a 10mm/2.8 in Sony e-mount (doesn't cover FF) - I think mine was made by Samyang.
There are quite a few others, but I tend not to buy modern lenses. I manage to spend far to much on photography without buying new :0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 12:09 am Post subject: Re: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
Has any company made manual (that is: mechanical coupled) APS-C lenses?
...
Correct me if I am wrong, but APS-C cameras came about after lenses became auto focus without aperture rings, etc. So are there any mechanical lenses that were designed for APC-C that might be adapted?
Regards, C. |
Konica Hexanon Zoom Lens 24x18 1:3.5 f=47-100mm
https://www.buhla.de/Foto/Konica/Objektive/e47-100_35.html
I have one of those rare beasts ... but I wouldn't recommend it for real photography;)
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Pentax 110 lenses http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=69996
Nordentro wrote: |
These are the two best lenses of the Pentax 110 lineup. They do well on m43 sensors with adapters with built in aperture.
Here is mine:
|
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
They do very well on MFT, but they were designed for 110 film which is smaller than APS which is the subject of the thread.
The 24mm does come very close to covering APS-c but the 18mm falls quite a long way short. The 50 will cover APS completely but doesn't IMO have the charm of it's smaller brothers
Last edited by DConvert on Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 514 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
I'm thinking the Industar-69 28mm f/2.8 might (just) fit into this category.
It's from the USSR-made 'Chaika' camera, a half-frame 35mm camera with a 39mm thread interchangeable lens mount, though it's not exactly Leica/FED/Zorki etc. compatible and I'm unaware of any other lenses produced to fit.
I use one on my Samsung NX5 as a walkabout snapshotter with an f/8 and be there approach, fitted to an L39 adaptor … it doesn't focus to infinity with the aperture wide open, though can be modified, I believe, but for what I want it for it's quite adequate and very compact … just watch out for backlit subjects, it'll flare like crazy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 564 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:24 pm Post subject: full frame optics will serve on MFT |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
Apart from possible savings in weight and volume, full frame manual lenses will do as well on MFT as APS ones. There the choice of high quality mechanical focus and hand operated aperture optics is really large and if you really wish for tiny optics, some of the longer 16mm cine lenses will fill the MFT frame without vignetting. I have used a couple.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: full frame optics will serve on MFT |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
paulhofseth wrote: |
Apart from possible savings in weight and volume, full frame manual lenses will do as well on MFT as APS ones. There the choice of high quality mechanical focus and hand operated aperture optics is really large and if you really wish for tiny optics, some of the longer 16mm cine lenses will fill the MFT frame without vignetting. I have used a couple.
p. |
I've tended to use FF rangefinder lenses particularly LTM/L39 versions, when I want more compact optics.
They can be adapted to most mirrorless systems and can be quite small, certainly smaller than typical APS lenses
c-mount lenses can be quite effective on MFT too, but resolution is often disappointing, as can be the coverage (lenses wider than 35mm may not cover the sensor) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 564 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:42 pm Post subject: narrow film resolution |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
Lenses for 16mm will need substantially more resolution than those made for 35mm even considering that the brain compensates for unsharpness when watching movies. I recall using a 20something mm on MFT with good results. I do not have that one any longer so the exact data escapes me.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
There are some 'wider' enlarger lenses that aren't designed to cover more than half frame, you could check out those. 35mm~ and below it seems. _________________ UK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
There are some 'wider' enlarger lenses that aren't designed to cover more than half frame, you could check out those. 35mm~ and below it seems. |
My 50mm/1.2 only just covers MFT.
Most of the shorter focal length ones I've seen are designed for 8mm cine and won't come close to covering MFT. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
eggplant wrote: |
There are some 'wider' enlarger lenses that aren't designed to cover more than half frame, you could check out those. 35mm~ and below it seems. |
My 50mm/1.2 only just covers MFT.
Most of the shorter focal length ones I've seen are designed for 8mm cine and won't come close to covering MFT. |
You're likely talking about projection lenses... not film enlarger lenses.
Here are some APS-C covering 'enlarger' lenses
https://www.closeuphotography.com/schneider-kreuznach-28mm-f2-8-componon-lens
https://www.closeuphotography.com/schneider-componon-35mm/2018/12/4/schneider-componon-35mm-f28-line-scan-lens-test _________________ UK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 564 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
8mm format lenses certainly do not fill the MFT frame, but some for 16mm do. The Kinoptic 20something i tried worked, as did the mount modified Schneider 50/0,95 but Angenieux zooms mostly vignetted.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
DConvert wrote: |
eggplant wrote: |
There are some 'wider' enlarger lenses that aren't designed to cover more than half frame, you could check out those. 35mm~ and below it seems. |
My 50mm/1.2 only just covers MFT.
Most of the shorter focal length ones I've seen are designed for 8mm cine and won't come close to covering MFT. |
You're likely talking about projection lenses... not film enlarger lenses.
|
Indeed you're right! I should have read your post more carefully. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Also- noone has mentioned yet- a speedbooster/focal reducer is going to give you the most vintage, manual focus options without the crop factor / limited shallow DOF.
Recall that speedbooster adapters are physically shorter than their empty tube counterparts due to how the optics work (this is noted in the original white paper), and compare to the Pen F adapter - they are close in size.
Note the 20mm flange distance of MFT makes the speedbooster appear smaller *relative* to speedboosters for other mirrorless mounts, but I'm not sure that means too much. _________________ UK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 192
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
Of course, classic 35mm cinema camera lenses all cover APS-C, since it's (more or less) 18x24mm. However, they are expensive! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
if someone interested i have pentax 110 70mm 2.8 lens,
hardly ever used / like new .. i might be selling it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CharlesLogan
Joined: 13 Jul 2022 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
CharlesLogan wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.
Last edited by CharlesLogan on Fri Mar 22, 2024 12:38 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2023 7:46 pm Post subject: Re: Manual APS-C lenses |
|
|
KEO wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
Has any company made manual (that is: mechanical coupled) APS-C lenses? |
I don't know whether it's exactly what you're looking for, but the TTArtisan 50mm 1.2 APS-C lens is excellent - and brand new it's only about 100 USD.
The ZY 35mm Speedmaster 0.95 Mk.II is another excellent APS-C lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 234 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
Also- noone has mentioned yet- a speedbooster/focal reducer is going to give you the most vintage, manual focus options without the crop factor / limited shallow DOF.
Recall that speedbooster adapters are physically shorter than their empty tube counterparts due to how the optics work (this is noted in the original white paper), and compare to the Pen F adapter - they are close in size.
Note the 20mm flange distance of MFT makes the speedbooster appear smaller *relative* to speedboosters for other mirrorless mounts, but I'm not sure that means too much. |
Some time ago I bought a focal reducer / speed booster as an experiment. This was (is) a Viltrox in Nikon F mount. I haven't used it for a while so I am going on memory here, but my impression was that it really degrades image quality. So I didn't pursue that. Perhaps a Metabones is better, I don't know, but certainly a lot more expensive and a little difficult to find in anything except Canon EF. Around 500 euro for the Nikon F or Leica R. The Canon EF goes for over 800 euros. That's a bit steep for me. The place I usually shop for such things lists the three mentioned but only stocks the Canon EF version.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
My Metabones speedbooster ultra hasn't degraded IQ at all, and friends I know haven't found the Viltrox to turn their lenses into lemons.
You can adapt Nikon F and Leica R to Canon EF.
I have no idea where that 800 euro figure comes from except new and overpriced at that.
Prices of a 0.64x for MFT are very variable, as low as £105, to £186 and £220. The £105 one was mint in box.
I got my Ultra for APS-C for £140 in box. _________________ UK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|