| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:41 pm Post subject: Fujica Lens? - or not? |
 |
|
Oldhand wrote:
OK Fujica and Fujinon lovers, can you help me identify this lens please.
It is advertised as a Fujica 135/2.8 but I only have one image of it.
Is it Fujica, fujinon, EBC or not .......... any other information (any good?) would be valued
Your advice is appreciated
OH
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Never seen a Fuji like that. The barrel style is identical to Petri bayonet mount lenses.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RAART
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 499
Location: Oakville, ON, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RAART wrote:
I always thought that Fujica is a camera brand that used Fujinon lenses. But who knows... 
EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujica_X-mount
_________________
Camera: Pentax K3
FOR SALE:
Do you have Pentax-A or F or FA primes and like to trade?
Here is the list what I have to trade/sale:
Primes: - Kiron 28mm f2 (C/Y); Vivitar 28mm f2.5 Auto (FD); Minolta MD 50mm f2 (incl. adapter to m4/3); Miranda Auto 35mm f2.8 EC (incl. adapter to m4/3); Miranda Auto 135mm f2.8 EC (incl. adapter to m4/3);
Zoom Lenses:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
OK - apologies - I have done some more digging.
It is advertised as a Fuji lens, but in fact it is not.
It is a lens that I have never heard of - Raynette 135mm f2.8!
Any ideas on this lens - where made, who made etc
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
No idea, but whoever made it is clearly the same as made the Petri bayonet lenses. The Petri 1.8/55 is superb, the 2.8/35 is pretty good too so this 2.8/135 should be good I expect.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| No idea, but whoever made it is clearly the same as made the Petri bayonet lenses. The Petri 1.8/55 is superb, the 2.8/35 is pretty good too so this 2.8/135 should be good I expect. |
Thanks Ian.
This one is M42
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dimitrygo
Joined: 01 Apr 2009
Posts: 561
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
dimitrygo wrote:
Strange combination. It's overall design reminds Tokina lenses with this A/M switch in the middle. And it's overall cosmetics remind later Petri lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Thanks everyone for the feedback.
While I was getting your advice, the lens was sold - 
So I won't be able to add any more detail 
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
