View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:56 pm Post subject: Cosina 19-35 3.5-4.5 MF |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Does anyone have a Cosina 19-35mm, the older manual focus, full-frame version?
I'm considering one as the answer to my (low budget) requirement for a wide-angle lens on digital, and maybe some alternative viewpoints on film. I know it's not as good as a decent 17mm that many have on here, but how good/bad are they?
Thanks for any info
Graham |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewStuff
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 847 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NewStuff wrote:
Have yet to find one on Ebay that I don't get outbid on. Good luck getting one for a reasonable price. _________________ Too many to list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I have the AF version which I assumed was the same as the MF version. I also had a 19mm Cosina prime which had the same performance. They are both sharp on my 5Dii, except for the extreme corners, and I do mean the last few pixels. They do tend to flare easily and have a slight red cast. When the flare isn't a problem, they had good contrast too. I would say they are better than the Tamron 17mm Adaptall lens except when pointed into the sun; the Tamron is nowhere near as sharp. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Good info, thanks chaps |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dropmyload
Joined: 30 Sep 2011 Posts: 56 Location: Nairobi, Kenya
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dropmyload wrote:
I bought a copy recently, is this the one you are referring to?
haven't shot much with it yet...
_________________ Canon 80D � EF 50 II � Canon 100-400L
Vivitar 28/2.5 � RE, Auto-Topcor 3.5cm/2.8 �Helios 44-2 �Meyer Optik Gorlitz Trioplan 100/2.8 � Tele Lentar 135/2.8 � Soligor 180/3.5
Yongnuo 468II, 565 EX & some 622C
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smandavia/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1389 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
I had this lens in AF version (same optics though). It's good and sharp, with rather noticeable geometric distortion and CA (nothing articularly bad though). Flare was a bit of a problem though, but it's a cheap lens and it's got to have its share of imperfections. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2201 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
This lens is sharp over all the (apsc) frame, it has a very useful focal range both for ff and for apsc (which is something quite rare) and it's cheap.
Distortion is evident, but on par with many wide zooms.
I think it's really a useful lens, especially at the wide end, where you'd need a much more expensive lens to outperform this.
I sold it because after buying a flektogon 20 it wasn't getting much use, but I warmly recommend it to those who look for a cheap wide. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I keep seeing this and wondering if its worth having. They go for too much just to buy on spec. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
On APSC they will be sharp. I use on fullframe and film and the corners are not really noticeable. It's one of my favourite lenses. It has a couple of flaws but so what. I can work around them. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I had one, sold it after a week, on my EOS 450D corners were soft even at f8. Right side was worse than left so probably decentred, very susceptible to veiling flare too. The Tokina 20-35 is much better but also much harder to find, I think people keep hold of them. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|