Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Vintage lens help needed (35mm, 50mm, 85mm) for cinematogr.
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:46 pm    Post subject: Vintage lens help needed (35mm, 50mm, 85mm) for cinematogr. Reply with quote

Hello fellow filmmakers,

I am feeling confused and overwhelmed by the information there is out on vintage lenses and I have spend so much time my head is feeling to explode. I've come to the part where I need your help.

I am looking to build my first lens kit for cinematography (and a little bit photography) on my apsc sized sensor camera, mainly for vimeo style shorts.

The focal length I am currently searching for are 35mm, 50mm, 85mm but don't feel strictly to these if you have a great lens tell me.

So here is the criteria I looking for:

sharpness (if possible right from wide open, as much as the limitations following allow)
good color renderition
bokeh (good bokeh is a question of taste I know)
price (below 130€, cheaper price to performance beasts are much appreciated)

(5. radioactive lenses should be marked as such, please Wink)

My mount is Samsung NX Smile

If you know what you are talking about I would greatly welcome you if you could spend the time and post a top 3 of lenses to look for for each of the categories above. Sorry for taking your time, I know there are a lot of threads around this online, I have read many, but I came to the point where I just need the help of some smart people.

Thanks for your time. Have a great day. Your expertise is much appreciated. Jan


Last edited by R3jected on Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:10 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the native mount of your camera? Without knowing that we can't give you good suggestions.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would get Preset lenses as a priority, something like these
37/2.8 Mir-1 M42
58/2 Helios 44-2 M42
85/2 Jupiter 9 M42
Keep in mind these came in multiple mounts, M42 as I typed above, plus M39 Rangefinder and M39 SLR(If you stand the RF & SLR side by side, RF is longer to make up flange distance).


Last edited by Lightshow on Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:06 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lightshow wrote:
I would get Preset lenses as a priority, something like these
37/2.8 Mir-1 M42
58/2 Helios 44-2 M42
85/2 Jupiter 9 M42


You beat me on that one, russian lenses are indeed a very good bet.
"dogschidt" optics takes those and converts them for cine use, same
optics, new housing, focus gear etc. at much increased prices.

R3jected, same idea?? Wink Twisted Evil


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For filming you might want to consider focus breathing (unless you shoot without zooming).

Unfortunately, no one knows.

kenrockwell has some hints but he is really Canikon only basically.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks so far. You are right, I should have mentioned the camera / mount I am on, because I probably need an adapter !!
I am using the NX1 with Samsung NX mount Wink
I am looking farward for some more recommendations!
Have a great day!

About those Russian lenses, they are incredible for their price and USSR look for sure, but I am not a fan of their performance wide open (I know which is ridiculus to say at this pricepoint and image) Twisted Evil


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

R3jected wrote:
Thanks so far. You are right, I should have mentioned the camera / mount I am on, because I probably need an adapter !!
I am using the NX1 with Samsung NX mount Wink
I am looking farward for some more recommendations!
Have a great day!

About those Russian lenses, they are incredible for their price and USSR look for sure, but I am not a fan of their performance wide open (I know which is ridiculus to say at this pricepoint and image) Twisted Evil


Indeed it is ridiculous.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is your 130€ limit meant per lens or for all three?
Getting all three for 130€ would be next to impossible, 390€ for all three would give you quite a few choices.

Since you're looking for sharpness wide open, what maximum aperture do you want/need for each focal length?
There are a couple of 85/1.8s and 85/2s in your price range, lots of fast 50s (f/1.8 & f/1.7, a bit more for f/1.4) and slow (f/2.8) 35s.
A faster 35 (f/2, f/1.8) will cost quite a bit more.

Are you looking to de-click the aperture rings?
With many lenses, this is quite easy but you should probably know how before you buy a lens.
For example, here's a short tutorial for declicking nFD lenses: http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/2410/demo-de-clicking-canon-fd-lens-to-get-stepless-aperture/p1

35:
If you can live with f/2.8, the Minolta MD 35/2.8 (the later versions with 49mm filter thread) and the Canon nFD 35/2.8 are very sharp from f/2.8 and still fairly reasonably priced. If you want a faster 35, the Canon (n)FD 35/2 might be a good option (120-150€ if you're lucky), I'd go for the nFD.

Minolta:
http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/434-sony-a7rii-and-summilux-1-4-35mm-asph-sony-zeiss-fe-2-8-35mm-and-minolta-md-2-8-35mm (in german but you'll get the gist)
Canon:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4114
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-canon-new-fd-35mm-12-8/
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/shootout-the-canon-fd-35mm-lenses/


50:
Lot's of choices here, I'd go for a Minolta MC/MD 50/1.4 or the Canon nFD 50/1.4.

Minolta:
http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/322-nex-5n-und-minolta-50mm-objektive-teil-ii (again, in german)
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-minolta-mc-rokkor-50mm-11-4/
Canon:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4352
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/canon-new-fd-50mm-11-4-review/

85:
There aren't many 85s in your price range. The Canon (n)FD 85/1.8 may be a good choice, it's pretty common and often sells around 100€.
Here's a little shootout between an nFD 85/1.8 and a Minolta MD 85/2 I did a while back on a Fuji X-E1 (full resolution is available):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaktuskontrafaktus/albums/72157651877508545

The Canon has a very minor fungus infection, (I wouldn't expect any noticable impact on IQ). The MD85/2 is one of the sharpest manual 85s but it's well out of your price range (unless you get lucky).
The Canon has been waiting to get the fungus removed for a long time now, I should probably just sell it on the cheap...


Last edited by Boris_Akunin on Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:36 pm; edited 5 times in total


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boris_Akunin wrote:
Is your 130� limit meant per lens or for all three?
Getting all three for 130� would be next to impossible, 390� for all three would give you quite a few choices.

Since you're looking for sharpness wide open, what maximum aperture do you want/need for each focal length?
There are a couple of 85/1.8s and 85/2s in your price range, lots of fast 50s (f/1.8 & f/1.7, a bit more for f/1.4) and slow (f/2.Cool 35s.
A faster 35 (f/2, f/1.Cool will cost quite a bit more.

Are you looking to de-click the aperture rings?
With many lenses, this is quite easy but you should probably know how before you buy a lens.
For example, here's a short tutorial for declicking nFD lenses: http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/2410/demo-de-clicking-canon-fd-lens-to-get-stepless-aperture/p1

35:
If you can live with f/2.8, the Minolta MD 35/2.8 (the later versions with 49mm filter thread) and the Canon nFD 35/2.8 are very sharp from f/2.8 and still fairly reasonably priced. If you want a faster 35, the Canon (n)FD 35/2 might be a good option (120-150e if you're lucky), I'd go for the nFD.

Minolta:
http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/434-sony-a7rii-and-summilux-1-4-35mm-asph-sony-zeiss-fe-2-8-35mm-and-minolta-md-2-8-35mm (in german but you'll get the gist)
Canon:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4114
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-canon-new-fd-35mm-12-8/
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/shootout-the-canon-fd-35mm-lenses/


50:
Lot's of choices here, I'd go for a Minolta MC/MD 50/1.4 or the Canon nFD 50/1.4.

Minolta:
http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/322-nex-5n-und-minolta-50mm-objektive-teil-ii (again, in german)
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-minolta-mc-rokkor-50mm-11-4/
Canon:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4352
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/canon-new-fd-50mm-11-4-review/

85:
There aren't man y85s in your price range. The Canon (n)FD 85/1.8 may be a good choice, it's pretty common and usually sells around 100�.
Here's a little shootout between an nFD 85/1.8 and a Minolta MD 85/2 a while back on a Fuji X-E1 (full resolution is available):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaktuskontrafaktus/albums/72157651877508545

The Canon has a very minor fungus infection, (I wouldn't expect any noticable impact on IQ). The MD85/2 is one of the sharpest manual 85s but it's well out of your price range (unless you get lucky).
The Canon has been waiting to get the fungus removed for a long time now, I should probably just sell it on the cheap...


Danke, da schau ich mich schonmal um. Like 1 small


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

R3jected wrote:
Danke, da schau ich mich schonmal um. Like 1 small


Kleiner Nachtrag noch: Die Canon (n)FD Objektive sind vielleicht eine gute Wahl, wenn du die Blende stufenlos steuern willst, ohne am Objektiv zu basteln.
Die billigen Adapter haben alle einen mit "Lock <--> Open" beschrifteten Ring, der in den Blendenhebel am Objektivbajonett greift. Der ist eigentlich nur zum ansetzen des Objektives da (auf "Open" zum an-/absetzen und auf "Lock" zum benutzen). Auf "Open" ist das Objektiv auf Offenblende, wenn man den Ring Richtung "Lock" dreht, schließt sich die Blende stufenlos bis auf die am Blendenring eingestellte Blendenzahl. Der einzige Nachteil ist, dass du nicht weißt, welche Blende du gerade benutzt (es sei denn du hast den Ring gerade ganz auf "Lock" oder "Open").



PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Canon FD is probably the best option (maybe Hexanon AR or Minolta but for 85mm they are more pricey).

Mixing brands might not be the best with regards to color matching.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

padam wrote:
Canon FD is probably the best option (maybe Hexanon AR or Minolta but for 85mm they are more pricey).

Mixing brands might not be the best with regards to color matching.


Canon FD is a very good choice for 35mm & 50mm, not so much for 85mm (the 85/1.8 is decent and affordable but not the best 85 for w.o. sharpness & contrast.) The nFD 100/2 (rare, ~200-300€?) might be worth a look as an upgrade option.

I can't really speak to the various Nikon 85/1.8 lenses, Minolta might be the best choice if the priority is on 85mm. The MD 85/2 is hard to beat for w.o sharpness & contrast and the MC 85/1.7 has very good bokeh. But in that price range, a used Samyang 85/1.4 should be considered too.

I've collected some data to get an idea of current prices for a couple of (n)FD lenses:
(sold items since mid/end May, Ebay Europe)

Canon nFD 50/1.4
N=120
Min: 21€
Max: 95€
Average: 63€
Median: 60€

Canon FD 50/1.4
N=79
Min: 32€
Max: 95€
Average: 62€
Median: 60€

Canon nFD 85/1.8
N=20
Min: 102€
Max: 205€
Average: 157€
Median: 162€

Canon FD 85/1.8
N=11
Min: 80€
Max: 204€
Average: 140€
Median: 141€

Canon nFD 35/2.8
N=29
Min: 27€
Max: 99€
Average: 55€
Median: 55€

Canon nFD 35/2
N=9
Min: 87€
Max: 180€
Average: 131€
Median: 135€

Canon FD 35/2
N=29
Min: 61€
Max: 199€
Average: 140€
Median: 149€


Note: The upper end of the price range is usually dominated by lenses from commercial sellers (-> returns policy, warranty) and minty lenses with hoods & original packaging. The average/median prices for lenses in typical condition (full working order with some signs of wear, no hoods etc.) from private sellers will be lower.

EDIT: If you're going for Canon FD, you might want to get an adapter before you shop for lenses. The aperture on FD lenses remains closed until the lens is attached (to a camera, adapter or - if need be - to a rear cap with the bottom cut out) so you can't really check if the aperture mechanism is working.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

R3jected wrote:

About those Russian lenses, they are incredible for their price and USSR look for sure, but I am not a fan of their performance wide open (I know which is ridiculus to say at this pricepoint and image) Twisted Evil


These lenses are plenty sharp for 4K video.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are willing to use a 100mm rather than an 85mm you can get a set of excellent Hexanon lenses in your price range.

Konica Hexanon AR 35mm f2.8 $69.00
Konica Hexanon AR 50mm f1.4 $99.00
Konica Hexanon AR 100mm f2.8 $165.99

http://stores.ebay.com/Berger-Bros-Camera-and-Video?_dmd=2&_nkw=hexanon
http://www.ebay.com/itm/KONICA-AR-HEXANON-100mm-f2-8-PORTRAIT-LENS-for-mirrorles-cameras-JAPAN-GREAT-/222216236185?hash=item33bd1eac99:g:-8cAAOSwp5JWaFJ2