View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:57 pm Post subject: 200mm lenses focusing distance |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
Right now I got 2 200mm MF lenses and for both min focus distance is around 2.5 - 3 m. Do you know what is the shortest distance you can get with old mf lenses? 3m is a bit too much for my liking. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:09 pm Post subject: Re: 200mm lenses focusing distance |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
nurkov wrote: |
Right now I got 2 200mm MF lenses and for both min focus distance is around 2.5 - 3 m. Do you know what is the shortest distance you can get with old mf lenses? 3m is a bit too much for my liking. |
My Nikkor-Q 200/4 mfd is 2m. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VichySchwa
Joined: 08 Jan 2013 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VichySchwa wrote:
Define "Old" I'm looking at my Vivitar 3.5/200 (70's/early 80's era) and it reads 6 ft (1.8m) minimum... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
VichySchwa wrote: |
Define "Old" I'm looking at my Vivitar 3.5/200 (70's/early 80's era) and it reads 6 ft (1.8m) minimum... |
good point, by old I mean pre AF era lets say before 1986.
Is this Vivtar any good ? _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
Canon FD 200 f4 Macro
I know it's a macro lens with shallow DOF and not probably what you're looking for but you can get very close
The downside of this lens is its price and availability
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
yeah looking for something rather on a cheap side _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KarelDH
Joined: 24 Mar 2011 Posts: 169 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KarelDH wrote:
Hi,
Vivitar 200mm f=3
min distance is 1.2m
Really sharp
Nice bokeh
Only downside at f=3 white areas have a blue glow.
I use it alot myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
just seen some pictures and wow this looks amazing _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1827 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
You can put some extension rings or mount the lens on bellows.
That will reduce the minimum focus distance. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Photax 3.5 2.6 m / 7.5 feet
Takumar 4 2.5 m / 8.2 feet
Soligor 4.5 3m / 10 feet
But the metric imperial conversions leave a bit to be desired. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VichySchwa
Joined: 08 Jan 2013 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VichySchwa wrote:
nurkov wrote: |
VichySchwa wrote: |
Define "Old" I'm looking at my Vivitar 3.5/200 (70's/early 80's era) and it reads 6 ft (1.8m) minimum... |
good point, by old I mean pre AF era lets say before 1986.
Is this Vivtar any good ? |
Here are 2 threads regarding Vivitar 200's but the 2nd one is regarding the lens most similar to mine. The presets are from an earlier period...
http://forum.mflenses.com/a-few-photos-with-a-vivitar-200mm-f-3-5-preset-lens-t20502
http://forum.mflenses.com/male-cardinal-and-house-finch-t15701
It appears @ 3.5 not so clean but 5.6 and higher it's nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
If quickly going from infinity to near focus isn't required, slap a couple macro tubes on the front and you'll get much closer focus. My 400mm focuses no closer than 25 feet, but with a macro tube set the minimum distance is more like 7 feet. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
std wrote: |
You can put some extension rings or mount the lens on bellows.
That will reduce the minimum focus distance. |
I am aware of this but it's not a route I want to go _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
KarelDH wrote: |
Hi,
Vivitar 200mm f=3
min distance is 1.2m
Really sharp
Nice bokeh
Only downside at f=3 white areas have a blue glow.
I use it alot myself. |
only one on ebay and in FD mount _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DR.JUAN
Joined: 08 Feb 2013 Posts: 661
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DR.JUAN wrote:
Don't use the super dinarex 4/200. The minimal distance is 8 m. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
Novoflex 200mm/4 with its focussing bellow grip ~ 1 meter.
But it is not very small. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5077 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Among long focal lengths, min focusing distances :
CZJ Sonnar 2.8/180 : 2,00m
Jupiter-6 2.8/180 : 2,00m
Jupiter-21M 4/200 : 1,80m
Meyer Optik Görlitz Orestegor 4/200 : 2,40m
Prinzflex auto reflex 3.5/200 : 2,70m
Soligor Tele-auto 3.5/200 : 2,40m
Steinheil München Tele-Quinar 4.5/200 : 2,00m
Soligor 4.5/250 : 4,00m...
Taïr-3A 4.5/300 Brussels grand prix 1958 : 3,00m
Taïr-300A 4.5/300 : 2,20m
CZJ MC Sonnar 4/300 : 3,90m
Soligor 6.3/400 : 6,30m...
Tamron AD2 (55B) SP 8/500 Catadioptric : 1,70m _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740
Last edited by Olivier on Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:12 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
lol _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 398 Location: France
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
I don't know all the 200mm, but the Canon nFD 200mm f4 is probably the smallest, lightest, (cheapest), with the best mfd, among the non-macro 200/4, :
1.5m
121.5mm
440g
(Yep, better than the Nikkors ai/ais
And, yes, there's 2 close focus 200mm, the Vivitar 200/3 and the Tamron 180/2.5, both 1.2m
Then, an intermediate mammoth, the MC SONNAR 2,8/180 CARL ZEISS JENA DDR 1,1kg/1,365kg : mfd 1.7m
All these lenses are great !
2 zooms also offers you a 200mm macro 1:2 (i.e. mfd 0.7m) for a ridiculous price + of course the Vivitar 90/180 (but forget the price unless you're lucky _________________ "Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
KarelDH wrote: |
Hi,
Vivitar 200mm f=3
min distance is 1.2m
Really sharp
Nice bokeh
Only downside at f=3 white areas have a blue glow.
I use it alot myself. |
+1 Except on NEX-5N no CA issues. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
Phenix jc wrote: |
I don't know all the 200mm, but the Canon nFD 200mm f4 is probably the smallest, lightest, (cheapest), with the best mfd, among the non-macro 200/4, :
1.5m
121.5mm
440g |
I can't get canon FD because I want to use it on canon eos and adapter has glass element in it _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
I tried some 200 primes (Nikon, Pentacon, Takumar and Yashica DX all f4), Zeiss Sonnar 200/2,8.
Now I have CZ Vario Sonnar 80-200/4 T* which beat all 200s I tried at 200mm
CZ Vario Sonnar 80-200/4 T* has MFD 1 meter. Here's my samples http://ihyaahsani.blogspot.com/2012/09/cz-vario-sonnar-80-2004-t.html _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 398 Location: France
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
nurkov wrote: |
Phenix jc wrote: |
I don't know all the 200mm, but the Canon nFD 200mm f4 is probably the smallest, lightest, (cheapest), with the best mfd, among the non-macro 200/4, :
1.5m
121.5mm
440g |
I can't get canon FD because I want to use it on canon eos and adapter has glass element in it |
Yes. DSLR and mf lenses divorced in my case
Why am I not surprised...?
I didn't know about the 1m MFD, great stuff. _________________ "Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrano
Joined: 15 Feb 2013 Posts: 855 Location: UK
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
cyrano wrote:
[quote="Phenix jc"]
nurkov wrote: |
Why am I not surprised...?
I didn't know about the 1m MFD, great stuff. |
That is some lens you have there, the clarity is very impressive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3437 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
My Vivitar (Komine) 200mm 3.5 has MFD of 1.80;
CZJ Sonnar 180mm 2.8 has MFD 1.70m.
But Tamron SP-52A 70-210mm 3.5-4.0 goes byond 1.00m en does 1:2 without extra accessoires. Very nice for € 10.00 on a shrift market:D
But somewhat large and heavy.
I have a Tamron 103A 80-210mm 3.8-4 (smaller and lighter) with MFD 0.90m (1 : 2.8 )
So I think you have to look for some zoom with a good reputation.
The both Tamrons din't cost me too much (the SP was a steal) and the 103A is not much larger then an older 200mm prime. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|