Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Milkyway with Samyang 8mm F2.8
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:21 pm    Post subject: Milkyway with Samyang 8mm F2.8 Reply with quote


I know it could be a little better but I was in a hurry Wink


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love it, nice one.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked Shocked

Fantastic!

Settings? Set-up? Please Wink


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SonicScot wrote:
Shocked Shocked

Fantastic!

Settings? Set-up? Please Wink

ISO3200, F2.8, 30s, simple tripod, some PP


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ForenSeil wrote:
SonicScot wrote:
Shocked Shocked

Fantastic!

Settings? Set-up? Please Wink

ISO3200, F2.8, 30s, simple tripod, some PP

Interesting, thanks.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another one (sorry for bad WB)


Last edited by ForenSeil on Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:22 pm; edited 3 times in total


PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, very nice.

I didn't know a 8/2.8 version of this lens existed. Did you compare it against 8/3.5?


PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The latter one is really spectacular.


PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lena wrote:
Wow, very nice.

I didn't know a 8/2.8 version of this lens existed. Did you compare it against 8/3.5?

It's pretty new and only for NEX and MFT
The F2.8 version is much smaller (like a 50mm lens) an slightly sharper at wide apertures
But F3.5 version has much more "harmonic" distortion - it's easier to make a good composition and landscapes with it imho.
I sometimes regret that I swapped them.


Last edited by ForenSeil on Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:22 pm; edited 2 times in total


PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you.


PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As an amateur astronomer, I find these photos very nice. It's really quite amazing what you can do nowadays with modern digital equipment.

Just curious -- is there some reason why you didn't color correct the images? Oh, in a hurry, I see. Hope you don't mind?

It wasn't as easy to get a halfway decent color correction as I thought it would be. I like the way the post-sunset glow persists at the horizon, despite the color correction. Also, the trails left by aircraft running lights in the first photo give us an idea as to how long your shutter was open. I'm guessing somewhere between 30 seconds and a minute. Much longer than that and your point sources would look like comets.




PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who care WB, I never seen similar images, I love it very much.


PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The first moment I saw the original post I thought "white balance!".
Then again, it's simply being artistic to do what you want with the WB.
I don't think it's essential to correct WB in a photo of the stars, they can have any WB they want!
I like both the corrected and uncorrected versions. Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very true, as works of art, they can stand on their own merit. But in defense of WB, by doing so it brought out the subtle post-sunset colors along the horizon that were overpowered by the strong magenta cast. Also, most stars are not pure white (which is one thing that makes WB adjustments difficult), but run the gamut from blue to red. By doing a reasonably good job at WB correction -- and not saying that I was really able to pull it off, although I did try -- the stars' natural colors are able to shine through. Ergh -- pun intended, I suppose.