View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:41 pm Post subject: testing my lenses - part 89 - RMC Tokina 17mm/3.5 |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
_________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Thanks for sharing.
At which apertures are these shots?
Is your front element 100% clean?
My feeling says that my copy is (was) visibly sharper. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:47 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
if i remember correctly i shot most of them wide open
front glass is clean, looking through the lens against the light there is only some dust particles
you use nex, i use oly e-520 that probably has thicker AA filter than your camera, so that might be the reason for better sharpness of your copy of the lens. when i get Oly E-M5 i'll re-test all my lenses and post results _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Ahh... ok... I never used mine wide open. That might be the main reason.
I know this lens is very sensitive to a dirty front element. I had a problem very slight condensation of a few very tiny oily drops in the inside which caused a massive sharpness falloff, especially in center after a while. I think that was caused by relubing with unsuitable oil by the seller (mine has also "wet" aperture blades). Mine is currently on repair. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 398 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
the lens is known to be weak w o, and better at f8 (which is the normal use of a 17mm imho) _________________ "Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Phenix jc wrote: |
the lens is known to be weak w o, and better at f8 (which is the normal use of a 17mm imho) |
As user of the Canon 14L II, I sincerely agree |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Phenix jc wrote: |
the lens is known to be weak w o, and better at f8 (which is the normal use of a 17mm imho) |
..those examples from WolverineX here don't look so weak for me _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 398 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
Tedat wrote: |
Phenix jc wrote: |
the lens is known to be weak w o, and better at f8 (which is the normal use of a 17mm imho) |
..those examples from WolverineX here don't look so weak for me |
(...) weak w o = in comparison with others 17/18mm.
Or even 20/21mm.
Don't miss my purpose : it's a VG lens once stopped down. I sold mine for a Zuiko 21mm 3.5 during the film era, and I bought another one for pennies a couple of years ago _________________ "Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Your images look quite good reduced to 1024px. Do they look as good at the original resolution?
I keep trying to convince myself that I want to sell my copy of this lens. After all, I like my two Nikkor 20s better...I think. But, then I take it out and use it, and talk myself out of selling it.
It is pretty weak wide open. But, stopped down, it works very well. The OP used it with an Oly E-M5. That's a 2x crop factor, isn't it? Anyway, I was on a job a couple days ago--a burned mansion in Southern California. I snapped this shot of the house front with my Tokina 17/3.5 RMC on a Nikon D700 (104 degree FOV). It really is sharper on edges and corners than I thought it would be--as long as it's stopped down a bit.
_________________ The longer I use autofocus lenses,
The greater my preference for manual focus grows. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
Arninetyes wrote: |
It is pretty weak wide open. But, stopped down, it works very well. The OP used it with an Oly E-M5. That's a 2x crop factor, isn't it? |
correction, i used it with oly e-520. E-m5 isn't in the stores in my country yet. have to wait until mid-April to buy it. when i do , i'll redo my whole "testing my lenses" series _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
[quote="Tedat"]
Phenix jc wrote: |
..those examples from WolverineX here don't look so weak for me |
For me the first two are still looking soft for this lens.
Here's bye the way an example what happens when the front lens get's slightly dirty (ugly examples):
Some very tiny drops of oily condensation from lubricant on the backsite of the front element.
@f/5.6
100% 16MP Crop
Compare the sharpness of the bird in the middle with the other two _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
well... that looks weak to me! _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
new samples using E-M5
_________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
It's a lens that deserves a bigger sensor imho, you really miss out on the wonderful perspectives it gives with a 2x crop. This is one of my favourite lenses on NEX and 35mm film, I always feel a bit disappointed with losing some of the wide perspective when I use it on the NEX, at f8 on film it is sharp right to the corners. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2201 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
It's a lens that deserves a bigger sensor imho, you really miss out on the wonderful perspectives it gives with a 2x crop. This is one of my favourite lenses on NEX and 35mm film, I always feel a bit disappointed with losing some of the wide perspective when I use it on the NEX, at f8 on film it is sharp right to the corners. |
I agree, I'm always a bit disappointed when I use wides on my apsc a55.
But, not considering the crop, samples look really good to me. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i'm thinking of selling it, so i can finance new buys at next months Zagreb Photo Fair. _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|