View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:21 pm Post subject: Milkyway with Samyang 8mm F2.8 |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
I know it could be a little better but I was in a hurry _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I love it, nice one. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Fantastic!
Settings? Set-up? Please _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
SonicScot wrote: |
Fantastic!
Settings? Set-up? Please |
ISO3200, F2.8, 30s, simple tripod, some PP _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
SonicScot wrote: |
Fantastic!
Settings? Set-up? Please |
ISO3200, F2.8, 30s, simple tripod, some PP |
Interesting, thanks. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Here's another one (sorry for bad WB)
_________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:22 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
Wow, very nice.
I didn't know a 8/2.8 version of this lens existed. Did you compare it against 8/3.5? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
The latter one is really spectacular. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Lena wrote: |
Wow, very nice.
I didn't know a 8/2.8 version of this lens existed. Did you compare it against 8/3.5? |
It's pretty new and only for NEX and MFT
The F2.8 version is much smaller (like a 50mm lens) an slightly sharper at wide apertures
But F3.5 version has much more "harmonic" distortion - it's easier to make a good composition and landscapes with it imho.
I sometimes regret that I swapped them. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:22 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
As an amateur astronomer, I find these photos very nice. It's really quite amazing what you can do nowadays with modern digital equipment.
Just curious -- is there some reason why you didn't color correct the images? Oh, in a hurry, I see. Hope you don't mind?
It wasn't as easy to get a halfway decent color correction as I thought it would be. I like the way the post-sunset glow persists at the horizon, despite the color correction. Also, the trails left by aircraft running lights in the first photo give us an idea as to how long your shutter was open. I'm guessing somewhere between 30 seconds and a minute. Much longer than that and your point sources would look like comets.
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Who care WB, I never seen similar images, I love it very much. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
The first moment I saw the original post I thought "white balance!".
Then again, it's simply being artistic to do what you want with the WB.
I don't think it's essential to correct WB in a photo of the stars, they can have any WB they want!
I like both the corrected and uncorrected versions. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Very true, as works of art, they can stand on their own merit. But in defense of WB, by doing so it brought out the subtle post-sunset colors along the horizon that were overpowered by the strong magenta cast. Also, most stars are not pure white (which is one thing that makes WB adjustments difficult), but run the gamut from blue to red. By doing a reasonably good job at WB correction -- and not saying that I was really able to pull it off, although I did try -- the stars' natural colors are able to shine through. Ergh -- pun intended, I suppose. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|