Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Meyer Optik Trioplan: f2.8/100mm vs f2.9/50mm
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:56 pm    Post subject: Meyer Optik Trioplan: f2.8/100mm vs f2.9/50mm Reply with quote

The 100mm is famous for its very special bokeh - but how about the f2.9/50mm version?

Any experiences here?


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I doubt many have used it on digital as it is usually found in fixed mount, but it was available in some interchangeable mounts. I happen to have one in Altix mount, sadly the Altix-N was dead so I removed the mount and dispose of the camera.

I can improvise a NEX mount for it and make some test shots if you want to know about it's rendering.

The Meyer Primotar 3.5/135 has similar bokeh to the Trioplan 2.8/100 btw, it has those glowing disks but doesn't have the outline rings on the disks so it's a bit smoother looking than the Trioplan.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it a triplet? If so, I wonder if it's anything like a Meritar?


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would imagine it would be like the domiplan, but from what I've seen the OOF areas are more "sparkly".


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It has no special bokeh

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_50mm_f2_9/? at least I wasn't impressed. (by at 100mm either Smile )

Post war Alu 100mm is excellent for some limited scenes, otherways just low performer lens.

She got rather big hype than real value. I test and sold all.
I respect lot more pre-war Meyer lenses

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_10cm/?

Latest Trioplan N

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8_exa/?

Post war Alu 100
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8/?


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

have one 50 in Exakta mount, if you wanna check it yourself you can get it for a while - i do not find anything special with it


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I have a pre-war and a post war version in Exakta mount (somewhere....) but never really used it
and wondered if it would be worth to dig it out.

Thanks guys and especially Attila for showing examples!


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The prewar 10,5cm has the distinguishing bokeh as well: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1218882.html#1218882

I've got no experience with the 50mm, I have with the Trioplan 7,5cm f/2.8 and that one didn't have it but that's C-mount.


PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trioplan 2.9/50 for Altix. Wide open on NEX-3. Just a typical triplet to me, a bit soft wide open and contrast is a bit on the low side, a little bit of swirl.


#1

#2

#3

#4


PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not bad at all Ian, even if no special nice little lens.


PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks. I agree, it is a nice little lens. I bet it's pretty sharp at f8-f11. The way it renders is nice, might be a nice lens for portraits on APS-C, I'll try it out more.


PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
It has no special bokeh

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_50mm_f2_9/? at least I wasn't impressed. (by at 100mm either Smile )

Post war Alu 100mm is excellent for some limited scenes, otherways just low performer lens.

She got rather big hype than real value. I test and sold all.
I respect lot more pre-war Meyer lenses

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_10cm/?

Latest Trioplan N

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8_exa/?

Post war Alu 100
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8/?

Horses for courses, but the Trioplan is one of my favourite lenses; mad wide open, sharp at 5.6 and smaller.


PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martinsmith99 wrote:
Attila wrote:
It has no special bokeh

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_50mm_f2_9/? at least I wasn't impressed. (by at 100mm either Smile )

Post war Alu 100mm is excellent for some limited scenes, otherways just low performer lens.

She got rather big hype than real value. I test and sold all.
I respect lot more pre-war Meyer lenses

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_10cm/?

Latest Trioplan N

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8_exa/?

Post war Alu 100
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/meyer/trioplan_100mm_f2_8/?

Horses for courses, but the Trioplan is one of my favourite lenses; mad wide open, sharp at 5.6 and smaller.



I agree, i like also my both trioplans 50 and 100 Smile

some examples

http://www.flickr.com/photos/57012003@N05/sets/72157631399175596/