| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dr.volkan
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 436
Location: Turkey_istanbul
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:21 am Post subject: pentax smc takumar 200 f=4 (M42) sharp at f,=4 |
 |
|
dr.volkan wrote:
i am very happy with nx11 and this super sharp smc takumar ..
what are your opinions about this fixed tele..
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
excellent results, sure is sharp.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
Such a modest-aperture lens is not difficult to design and manufacture. It probably reaches optimum at f/5.6-8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
| Oreste wrote: |
| Such a modest-aperture lens is not difficult to design and manufacture. It probably reaches optimum at f/5.6-8. |
yeah, but with takumar build quality, it aint cheap. If these lenses were made like this today, they would be much costlier than the current prices on the used market.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 2201
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
yeah, but with takumar build quality, it aint cheap. If these lenses were made like this today, they would be much costlier than the current prices on the used market. |
Sure, and with a bit of patience you can get one for really little money.
_________________
C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| Such a modest-aperture lens is not difficult to design and manufacture. It probably reaches optimum at f/5.6-8. |
yeah, but with takumar build quality, it aint cheap. If these lenses were made like this today, they would be much costlier than the current prices on the used market. |
Yes, of course. Everything costs more these days. Nothing new about that.
Is it like this one?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pentax-Asahi-Super-Takumar-f1-4-200-mm-Lens-w-both-end-caps-in-Original-Case-/190749360746?pt=Film_Cameras&hash=item2c698c426a
I never understood why more companies did not use built-in hoods, like Leica and Nikon:
Who has time to screw in a lens shade? Ridiculous!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6627
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Excellent Seagulls !
Great choice of subject, I approve !
The 200/4 Takumar is my choice of a standard for 200mm, a great lens has to beat it.
They are still fairly cheap even now I think.
As for built-in hoods - I don't like them.
The main point of a hood is to prevent extra non-image light from entering the optical system. Most built in hoods are nowhere near deep enough to do a good job. This is understandable as there is limited space on a lens, usually. The Leitz lens below is one of the few with a good built-in hood. The Nikon ones aren't deep enough, even on the excellent Nikkor-Q 135/2.8.
The other use of a hood is to prevent damage to the lens. The hood is a more effective protection than a skylight filter. Its job is to be an expendable component to absorb damage if the lens is dropped or bashed against something. If the hood is bent or scraped, no problem, they are cheap. If the hood is part of the lens, then you have damage to the lens. And from what I have seen built in hoods are often very loosely fixed when extended, so they may collapse immediately instead of absorbing damage.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
I thought the original post was Luis!
Fine samples anyway 
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Not only Leica and Nikon have built-in hoods. I have Pentax, Minolta, Tamron, Pentacon and CZJ lenses with them, and I expect there are many more.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10543
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| Oreste wrote: |
| hifisapi wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| Such a modest-aperture lens is not difficult to design and manufacture. It probably reaches optimum at f/5.6-8. |
yeah, but with takumar build quality, it aint cheap. If these lenses were made like this today, they would be much costlier than the current prices on the used market. |
Yes, of course. Everything costs more these days. Nothing new about that.
|
Top design, materials, & construction for the time make this lens one of the best 200mm MF lenses...admitted, the Nikkor 4/200 may be slightly better...
| Oreste wrote: |
Is it like this one?
[...]
|
Yes, exactly.
| Oreste wrote: |
I never understood why more companies did not use built-in hoods, like Leica and Nikon:
[...]
Who has time to screw in a lens shade? Ridiculous![...] |
Someone with less time than it takes to replace a built-on hood...
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| hifisapi wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| Such a modest-aperture lens is not difficult to design and manufacture. It probably reaches optimum at f/5.6-8. |
yeah, but with takumar build quality, it aint cheap. If these lenses were made like this today, they would be much costlier than the current prices on the used market. |
Yes, of course. Everything costs more these days. Nothing new about that.
|
Top design, materials, & construction for the time make this lens one of the best 200mm MF lenses...admitted, the Nikkor 4/200 may be slightly better...
| Oreste wrote: |
Is it like this one?
[...]
|
Yes, exactly.
| Oreste wrote: |
I never understood why more companies did not use built-in hoods, like Leica and Nikon:
[...]
Who has time to screw in a lens shade? Ridiculous![...] |
Someone with less time than it takes to replace a built-on hood... |
I don't understand the last comment. Screwing in the lens then screwing in the hood...by that time it's time to go home! But the lens is a thing of beauty! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
Later Pentax M and A series k mount lenses went to built in hoods so I guess Pentax joined the crowd.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
well if you have time to screw the lens into the body, then you have time to screw the hood onto the lens.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
well if you have time to screw the lens into the body, then you have time to screw the hood onto the lens. |
LOL
By that time the model has fainted from starvation! LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
killwilly
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
killwilly wrote:
My Japanese made Helios 135 has a built-in hood, which I do like.
Ignore the "58", that was the lens the shot was taken with. 
Helios 58 by killwilly, on Flickr
_________________
Alan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| killwilly wrote: |
My Japanese made Helios 135 has a built-in hood, which I do like.
|
The Takumar 200 f/4 seems to be a beautiful lens, with high optical quality, but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 2201
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
| Oreste wrote: |
| but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
For you.
For some others it isn't.
For some it's eventually better than a built-in hood.
_________________
C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6627
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
In the old Russian army they always kept the bayonets fixed on their rifles. I always keep the hoods fixed on my lenses!
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GaborF
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GaborF wrote:
Really great shots - the seagull is amazing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| Aanything wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
For you.
For some others it isn't.
For some it's eventually better than a built-in hood. |
Mein Gott in Himmell! Wie ist das möglich! LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 2201
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
| Oreste wrote: |
| Aanything wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
For you.
For some others it isn't.
For some it's eventually better than a built-in hood. |
Mein Gott in Himmell! Wie ist das möglich! LOL |
_________________
C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
| Oreste wrote: |
| killwilly wrote: |
My Japanese made Helios 135 has a built-in hood, which I do like.
|
The Takumar 200 f/4 seems to be a beautiful lens, with high optical quality, but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
The super multi coatings are so good it make the lens so flare resistant that you dont even really need a hood anyway.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oreste
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oreste wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
| Oreste wrote: |
| killwilly wrote: |
My Japanese made Helios 135 has a built-in hood, which I do like.
|
The Takumar 200 f/4 seems to be a beautiful lens, with high optical quality, but the screw-in hood is a hindrance. |
The super multi coatings are so good it make the lens so flare resistant that you dont even really need a hood anyway. |
Possibly, but the hood helps protect against damaging the filter ring. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1782
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
oh you guys and your hoods
I would really like to do a survey and see if hood preference aligns with or with-not being circumcised as a child
My 200mm f4 is in the post! Ive been looking for a tele to hunt down the local Animals. I couldn't get close enough with my Takumar 150mm,..
Original
So a 200 should have the wildlife plastered over the sensor correctly 
The curse has been started tho and I find myself looking at 300mm Tair's and Taks.. Tairs are still about half the price!!! Although Takumar 6x7 Lens are cheaper then M42 mount.. I'll probably end up with a Tair 3 .
With a hood, even tho I'm circumcised |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
