| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:59 pm Post subject: Sigma 24mm/2.8 AF vs Canon EF 24/2.8 (first version) ? |
 |
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Does have somebody experience with these lenses ? The Sigma seems a rather good one and can be bought for much less than the EF 24/2.8 .But the difference is so big in IQ ? The sigma fits on the film EOS , and there I'd need a 24 compact prime for the APS IX and the EOS 50e .But I won't pay 150-250 E for the EF
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57850
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I never heard ever bad Sigma 24mm even oldest one are good, I did try Sigma made Quantaray 24mm Minolta Af lens , made nice pictures.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Posts: 470
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
If it's the Mini-wide II, that lens has been much lauded.
No personal experience with it. Sigma made some real gems and some suckers.
You may find a review of the EF at kenrockwell maybe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7554
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
If it is the AF version of the Super-Wide II, it will be a good lens for EOS film cams.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you.
Last edited by calvin83 on Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Posts: 470
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
Eh, they just made too many lenses. Ultra wide, mini wide, super wide .. One of them 24 or 28 was said to be spectacular and much sought-after. If you are cheap and 28mm are ok you could also try the 28-70 3.5-4.5 High Speed AF. A little underrated gem |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Yes, the Super-wide II Macro 24mm 2.8
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5019
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well Sigma back then must have known they made a VG MF lens i.e. 24mm f2.8 superwide II, and I'd be surprised if they changed the optics and made a different AF lens that was inferior.
BTW I only have the MF one and it's excellent.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
