View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:42 am Post subject: Some B/W |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Some weeks ago I was hiking about 120km through northern Germany and of course I also took a few pics
I haven't processed an uploaded many yet, but I wan't some C&C
The first pic is a lot undersized for my taste, but it would blast the max. allowed length in this gallery.
Larger: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54671350@N02/7709817294/sizes/k/in/photostream/
_________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
All great, but #2 is stunning. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
#1: Great sky&clouds but the format really doesn't work well for online viewing. Maybe try to crop a little from both sides and make it taller? And part of that hill in the bottom left is to me a bit distracting. Either include more of it or none at all. at least that's what I'd go for.
#2: Just awesome! Maybe just try to correct the leaning perspective a bit? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
David wrote: |
All great, but #2 is stunning. |
Gorgeous church, love the picture! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
2 and 3 for me, very impressive work. The pano, if there were sunrays stabbing down through
the clouds, something to relieve the rather boring lighting, would have helped greatly, my opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
#3 is my overall fave, all is in balance there.
#2 is a great shot but somehow the B&W looks unnatural
a little bit overdone for my taste,
looks like this Silvereffex "wet rocks" filter or so ...
which filter did you use ?
#1:
+ the best i like the sky
- there's no point where the eyes could rest on ...
- from composition: I would rather see more sky or more landscape
composing in 3rds would maybe better for this shot ...
-lots of stiching errors in the skies
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database !
Last edited by tobbsman on Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:41 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
What Tobias said..... _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Lena wrote: |
David wrote: |
All great, but #2 is stunning. |
Gorgeous church, love the picture! |
+1 _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
tobbsman wrote: |
#3 is my overall fave, all is in balance there.
#2 is a great shot but somehow the B&W looks unnatural
a little bit overdone for my taste,
looks like this Silvereffex "wet rocks" filter or so ...
which filter did you use ?
#1:
+ the best i like the sky
- there's no point where the eyes could rest on ...
- from composition: I would rather see more sky or more landscape
composing in 3rds would maybe better for this shot ...
-lots of stiching errors in the skies
Cheers
Tobias |
thx for honest and very productive C&C!
#2 is converted with SilverEfex but the unnatural effect is caused by a red filter (dark blues) _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I like very much #2 except that in my opinion there's a little too much sharpening
If you look around the top of the tower you can see the halo. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
I agree with Orio. The "sharpening" halo is much worse on the full size original (Flickr). Also the skies are littered with rectangular patterns and, in different places, white spots.
An interesting Flickr name btw. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulusje
Joined: 09 Aug 2012 Posts: 16 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
paulusje wrote:
I like number two the most, a little less sharpening would make it look even better. That lens is sharp enough as is _________________ ---
Regards,
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bhargav
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 Posts: 938 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
bhargav wrote:
David wrote: |
All great, but #2 is stunning. |
+1 _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/58547200@N00/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|