View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I keep championing the Yashica ML 80-200 / 4. I think it's a great lens and very under rated. If the 28-85 is as good then the two together would make a great pair of walkabout lenses. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I found the Koboron 24-70 to be what I needed, it's really surprisingly great. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
I see you're sorted now Ian but should you come across the series 1 Vivitar 24-70mm f/3.8-4.8 give it a try, l sold my copy a long time ago but remember it being more than a match for the 28/90 and lighter lol, looking forward to seeing pics from your new arrival |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I keep championing the Yashica ML 80-200 / 4. I think it's a great lens and very under rated. If the 28-85 is as good then the two together would make a great pair of walkabout lenses. |
The 35-105 is also excellent IMO. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Tervueren wrote: |
I see you're sorted now Ian but should you come across the series 1 Vivitar 24-70mm f/3.8-4.8 give it a try, l sold my copy a long time ago but remember it being more than a match for the 28/90 and lighter lol, looking forward to seeing pics from your new arrival |
I've had the Koboron for a while and have posted samples from it on here:
24mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
doomed-forever
Joined: 09 Aug 2014 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
doomed-forever wrote:
Tervueren wrote: |
I see you're sorted now Ian but should you come across the series 1 Vivitar 24-70mm f/3.8-4.8 give it a try, l sold my copy a long time ago but remember it being more than a match for the 28/90 and lighter lol, looking forward to seeing pics from your new arrival |
I do own that Vivitar 1 Series lens - mainly i've bought it some time ago for the 24mm Wideangle, because 28mm is often not wide enough for me. Great Pictures from your lens, but i do miss (at least here on my Screen) a bit of sharpness more...my 24-70 looks like new, into Original Box...it's bulky & heavy, and so far i have never used it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
doomed-forever
Joined: 09 Aug 2014 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
doomed-forever wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Avoid the Contax 28-70mm...it's a Sigma design
. |
Please stop this Rumor - this 28-70/3.5-4.5 is *not* a Sigma Design, but the Contax-N 28-80 is! But what's the Difference, Zeiss said, they couldn't do it better, back into their heyday, of this Lens. I remember that quite well. And the 28-80 Contax N Lens does also have the Zeiss T* Multicoatings. But anyway, alone from the MTF, i'd go for the 24-85 N, which does have also 24mm Wideangle. Both both Lenses are AF, and the matching Fringer Adapter for Sony FE Mount is very, extreme expensive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GoldMark
Joined: 21 Aug 2012 Posts: 185 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GoldMark wrote:
_________________ Best regards
Bernhard
https://deramateurphotograph.de/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
What about Minolta MD 28-85 f3.5-4.5? _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
doomed-forever wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Avoid the Contax 28-70mm...it's a Sigma design
. |
Please stop this Rumor - this 28-70/3.5-4.5 is *not* a Sigma Design, but the Contax-N 28-80 is! But what's the Difference, Zeiss said, they couldn't do it better, back into their heyday, of this Lens. I remember that quite well. And the 28-80 Contax N Lens does also have the Zeiss T* Multicoatings. But anyway, alone from the MTF, i'd go for the 24-85 N, which does have also 24mm Wideangle. Both both Lenses are AF, and the matching Fringer Adapter for Sony FE Mount is very, extreme expensive. |
lol that's from 2012 and you have already replied to that in 2015 _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Antoine wrote: |
What about Minolta MD 28-85 f3.5-4.5? |
I've got the AF version of this lens which is more or less optically identical (13/10 construction). However, I haven't tested it yet.
Here is a test report of the AF-version: http://www.kurtmunger.com/minolta_af_28_85mm_f_3_5_4_5id270.html
Nothing spectacular, to be honest. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PBFACTS
Joined: 24 Dec 2008 Posts: 564
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PBFACTS wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Thanks Graham, anything Sigma probably isn't going to fulfil my needs.
|
They are several versions of the sigma 28/70
You have to go to the 2.8 version (ex/non ex) for having top iq
I have the sigma 28/70 2.8 1st version in mf (also sold as af)
Versions 2 ,3... are all af
The optical quality is very good .. The only problem of that 1st version is that the barrel is plastic
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I have considered the Tamron SP 28-80 and the Tokina AT-X 28-85 but I expect they are the same level as the Konica 28-135 I already have (designed by Konica, built by Tokina, also sold as a Tokina AT-X lens) and I'd really like to have better than I already have or not really worth it.
|
I have the tokina atx 28-135 .. VERY handy (smooth / good minimum focusing distance) but the iq was medium .. I presume the konica version has more strict controls
I have also the tamron sp 28-135 .. IQ Seems (no field test) better but it is not handy (minimum focusing distance + stiff zoom action)
i can sell both _________________ OM USER .. I KEEP/USE:
Om2 sp + T32 (grip/filter/zoom) + T8
+ Zuiko 16mm 3.5 / 55mm 1.2 / 65-200 4/ x1.4
+ Sigma 8mm 4.0 / 14mm 3.5 / 18-35 3.5-4.5
+ Tamron 35/105 2.8
+Tokina 150/500 5.6
+ Kiron 105/2.8 macro 1:1
+ Vivitar S1 90/180 falst field macro
+ 2x Doubler HR7
>>I SELL: OM10 + OM4ti
+ i sell: OM Md1 + Md 2 + Grip PowerPack + charger
+ i sell: OM Zuiko 24mm 2.8 / 28mm 3.5 / 50mm 1.8 / 50mm 1.4 / 50mm 3.5 macro / 35-70 3.6 / 35-105 3.5-4.5 / 75-150 4 / 500mm / 2xA
+ i sell: OM Kiron 28/105 3.2-4.5 / 1.5 converter
+ i sell: OM Makinon reflex 5.6/300 + Spector reflex (makinon) 500mm
+ i sell: OM Macro panagor extender 1:1
+ i sell: OM Sigma 16mm 2.8 fisheye (last version) / 21-35 3.5-4.2 ot/ 28-70 2.8 /1000mm mirror
+ i sell: Tamron 28-70 3.5-4.5 / 28-80 sp 3.5-4.2 / 28-135 sp 4-4.5 / /28-200 3.5 / 35-135 3..5-4.5 / 90mm sp macro 1:1 2.8
+ i sell: OM Soligor 2x doubler / x3 converte
+ i sell: Soligor FisheEye x0.15
+ i sell: OM Tokina 28/135 4-4.6 / 70/210 3.5 (= vivitar S1 v2)
+ i sell: OM Vivitar 28-70 3.5-4.8 / 28-90 s1 2.8-3.5 / 35-70 2.8-3.8 / 55/2.8 Macro 1:1 (komine) / 70-150 3.8 ot (kiron) / 75-150 ot 3.8 (tokina + 2x matched)
+ i sell : OM cosina 100-500 5.6/8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Antoine wrote: |
What about Minolta MD 28-85 f3.5-4.5? |
I've got the AF version of this lens which is more or less optically identical (13/10 construction). However, I haven't tested it yet.
Here is a test report of the AF-version: http://www.kurtmunger.com/minolta_af_28_85mm_f_3_5_4_5id270.html
Nothing spectacular, to be honest. |
I have tested the Minolta AF 28-85mm (same optics as the MD 28-85mm!) against the Yashica ML 28-85 and two examples of the Nikkor AF 28-85mm. Considering detail resolution in the infinity range, the Minolta was the best. In addition, the Yashica ML is prone to quite extreme distortion, depending on the focusing distance. Vignetting wide open and at f5.6 is a problem with the Minolta, though, especially at f=28mm.
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1427 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
The Tamron Adaptall-2 SP 28-80 has been an excellent lens for my use.
I have two copies of it. One is more used than the other.
Across cameras from a 400D/XTi, 40D, 50D and 5D Mk IV, it's a great performer.
It offers accurate color rendition, nice sharpness, good contrast, and very pleasing results
for overall scene.
These are from my old XTi through the lens.
They are minimally processed.
Color rendition of the XTi was never great to begin with, and I gave up on correcting it
when I got the 40D. But I think these pictures offer the sharpness and detail quality
the lens can provide. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|