View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:28 pm Post subject: Morning Road |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
From today´s early walk. I had only 24-85/3.5-4.5 AF lens with me. D700 body.
#1, 24 mm, f/5.6, ISO 400
#2, 85mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
_________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
I really like #2 _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
With #1.....I've seen so many similar views when walking myself and it's very difficult to capture what you see on a camera and IMO the picture would probably need something like better shafts of sunshine or maybe a person walking away in the distance as a focal point.
for #2 ...I'm not very artistic, so for me the flare and horizon sloping down is a minus. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012 Posts: 332 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
#1 looks a bit oversharpened, and the abberation infested right part doesent add anything to the picture. It's a nice road but it needs something "more", pretty light or something to pull your focus in. Go back at sunset with gandalf and shoot again!
#2 would possibly benefit from cropping the top off, alternatively rotating it so the horizon is straight. Unsure what effect that would have on the stalk tho. Would probably forgive it some for the downward slanted perspective. That said, I do like the flare at the top, so it's a tricky picture
Both are nice shots tho, I don't mean to be that harsh _________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
I like the way the sunlight falls in both shots but in the first picture I would crop out the half-seen roof on the right and make the composition off-centre. In the second shot the sharp ears of wheat look great against the blurred background but I think I would prefer about 2 stops smaller aperture so that, although blurred, the background wheat would have enough detail to suggest repetition of the natural shape. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
Thank you for the comments. Both pics are really snapshots, taken while walking, so I didn´t take enough different versions (my usual mistake).
Yes, I agree, that the composition in #1 is too static, and the pic would be more interesting with somebody on the road. I´ll have to go back one fine morning and also try different angles and a better lens/smaller aperture.
Does this slight crop make it better?
I like the flare in #2, so I didn´t want to crop it out. Theforeground is also a bit confused. Maybe smaller aperture would help.
In this version, the tilting horizon (actually, there´s a slope) is straightened.
_________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|