Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch|Quick search    MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Leica Elmar 9cm/4

 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Focus Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NikonD



Level 3

Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1812
Location: Central Europe - NW Slovenija


PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:37 pm    Post subject: Leica Elmar 9cm/4 Reply with quote

I just bought this lens on ebay, it's an m39 version, serial nr.: 1286059
Can someone tell me when was this lens build and its actual price Wink
I found some samples on the net so I know it's a great lens
when I get the lens I'll post some samples in this thread
_________________
Roman
-------------------------
Sony NEX 5R
Tokina 17/3.5 RMC
Nikkor 24/2.8 Ai-S
Nikkor 35/2 K
Nikkor 50/1.4 Ai
Nikkor 55/2.8 Ai-S
Nikkor 85/1.8 H
Nikkor 105/2.5 Ai-S
Nikon 75-150/3.5 E
-------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 52377
Location: Budapest,Hungary

Expire: 2013-11-18

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheap always max 100 USD, look forward your results, if a Leica affordable that is maximum average lens , I am afraid this is fit on this lens too.
_________________
Attila - admin --- BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic - FOMAPAN on forum - Webshop EU

Items on sale on Ebay

35mm: Konica A4, Konica IIIA, Konica FC-1
MF: Konica Pearl I,II,III 6x4,5 Konica Semi Pearl
Film: Foma,Kodak, Fuji DIY development C41, FOMA LQR
Scan: Epson V500, scanassist (http://www.scanassist.org)
Shutter tester: LCD tester from member vfmoto
Digital: Panasonic G1, Sony Nex-3, Samsung NX100
Lenses: Konica Hexanons,Carl Zeiss,Carl Zeiss Jena,Meyer-Optik,Minolta MD,Yashica ML,Nikon,Olympus OM
DIY E-6,C41 and B&W
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
anscochrome



Level 1

Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 63
Location: Omaha, NE


PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 90mm F 4.0 Elmar is a nice, very lightweight lens. I shot with 3 different varisties of it in my film days, the classic M39 model, the M mount collapsable model, and the three element mid 1960's model. For technical performance, I would reach for my 2.8 elmarits or 2.0 Summicrons instead. If you are looking for absolutely pinpoint sharpness and high contrast, you will not find it here. But, for a pleasant to use, lightweight lens that produces pleasing pictures, I think you will like it just fine.

I would recommend avoiding the uncoated ones from the 1930's though, fortunately, the coated ones are generally easier to find anyway.

edit-just noticed you have already bought it-my apologies:(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
scsambrook



Level 3

Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 1347
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Expire: 2011-11-18

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to "The Leica Pocket Book" it was made in 1955. When it was new it cost around Ł60 in Britain (I think), equal to around Ł1200 today. It is a lovely lens, and you can unscrew the optical unit and use it on a bellows.
_________________
Stephen


I use: Pentax K10D Super and Tamron 90mm f2.5 and 135mm f2.5 lenses: Leica M2 and M8 + 21/35/50/90/135 lenses. For old times' sake I keep a Vito B and a Retina IIc. And for medium format I have a Bencini Comet S and a Kodak Brownie 127.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
DanielT74



Level 1

Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Posts: 192


PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anyone know how to tell the 3 element version?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
scsambrook



Level 3

Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 1347
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Expire: 2011-11-18

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The rare 3-element one is in M mounting. Unlike all the other rigid 90 Elmars it has click stops. There's a pic at https://tamarkin.auctionserver.net/view-auctions/catalog/id/3/lot/640/.
_________________
Stephen


I use: Pentax K10D Super and Tamron 90mm f2.5 and 135mm f2.5 lenses: Leica M2 and M8 + 21/35/50/90/135 lenses. For old times' sake I keep a Vito B and a Retina IIc. And for medium format I have a Bencini Comet S and a Kodak Brownie 127.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
iangreenhalgh1



Level 4

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 9101

Expire: 2014-01-07

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scsambrook wrote:
According to "The Leica Pocket Book" it was made in 1955. When it was new it cost around Ł60 in Britain (I think), equal to around Ł1200 today. It is a lovely lens, and you can unscrew the optical unit and use it on a bellows.


In the 1951 edition of 'The Leica Manual' by Morgan & Lester it simply says this:

The 90mm Elmar f/4: An all-round, semi-long-focus lens, the 90mm Elmar f/4 is suitable for both outdoor long-distance photographs and indoor portraiture. Because of it's focal length, it has naturally less depth of field than the shorter-focus Leica lenses; however, at the greater subject distances common in outdoor photography, this is of little consequence. Its speed is high considering its compactness and it's focal length. Its angle of view is 15 degrees vertically and 22 degrees horizontally.

Interesting how much it cost back then, any idea how much the Sonnar 2/85 was?
_________________
'The question I would really consider (especially if an amateur and on a budget) is whether or not anyone (including yourself, of course) can tell the difference in any situation for which you will use the lens...and if they can, why are they burying their noses in your prints hard enough to tell the difference instead of responding to the prints emotionally and thinking about what they might mean?' - 2F/2F on apug.org

Digital: Sony NEX-3, Samsung NX100, Canon EOS 450d
35mm SLR: Konica FT-1, Konica FC-1, Konica Autoreflex T, Carena SRH760, Exakta RTL1000, Canon EOS 10qd
35mm VF: Olympus Stylus, Konica C35, Konica A4, Konica MG, Konica MT-9, Ricoh FF-9, Ricoh AF-80
35mm RF: Zorki 6, Kiev II, Kiev IV, Contax IIIa, CZJ Werra III,
Medium format: Franka Rolfix, Mess Ikonta 524/16, Voigtlander Bessa with Skopar 3.5/105, Voigtlander Bessa with Voigtar 3.5/105, Kiev 6C, Century Graphic 23, Ensign Selfix 820, Kershaw 450
MF lenses: Schneider Angulon 6.5/68, Componon-S 5.6/100, C-Claron 4.5/135, Xenar 3.5/105, Mamiya C 2.8/45, Mamiya 2.8/80, CZJ Flektogon 4/50, Biometar 2.8/80, Zodiac 3.5/30, Tominon 4.5/135, Pullin Pulnar 2.8/100
Large Format: Ernemann HEAG Series VII version II 9x12 with Kodak Anastigmat 6.3/170
Konica Hexanons 4/21, 2.8/24, 3.5/28, 2.8/35, 1.8/40, 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 1.8/50, 3.2/135, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 4.5/300, 3.5-4.5/35-70, 4-4.6/28-135, 3.5/35-70, UC 3.5/45-100, 4/70-150, 4/65-135, UC 4/80-200. Hexars 3.5/28, 3.5/135, Konishiroku 2.8/35
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35, Skoparex 3.4/35, Tessar 2.8/50, Sonnar 1.5/50, Biotar 2/58, Pancolar 1.8/50, Cardinar 4/100, Zeiss-Opton Biogon 2.8/35
Meyer/Pentacons 2.8/28, Primagon 4.5/35, Trioplan 2.9/50, 1.8/50, 2.4/50, Primotar 3.5/50, Primotar 3.5/135
Topcon RE Auto Topcors 1.8/58, 3.5/135, 5.6/200
Russians: OKC1-18-1 2.8/18, OKC1-28-1 2.8/28, Jupiter-12 2.8/35, Jupiter-8 2/50, Industar-50 3.5/50, Industar-26M 2.8/50, Industar-22 3.5/50, Zenitar M2S 2/50, Helios-44-2, Jupiter-9 2/85, Jupiter-11 4/135, Tair-3C 4.5/300
Tokina 3.5/17, Nikon Auto Nikkor-N 2.8/24, Nikon Micro-Nikkor-P 3.5/55, Ross Xpress 3.5/4in, Ross Xpress 4/5in, Ross Xpress 4.5/8.5in, Wollensak APO-Raptar 10/541
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 16485
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

Expire: 2013-12-03

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scsambrook wrote:
According to "The Leica Pocket Book" it was made in 1955.

I confirm.
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause!

Carsten, Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
Sets:
Leica M8 - Voigtländer Heliar 4.5/15 & Ultron 2/28 & Ultron 1.7/35 & Heliar 2.5/75, Leica Summitar 2/50 & Elmar 4/90, Jupiter-3, Jupiter-8,
Sony NEX-7 / NEX-3 - Tamron 2.5/24, Pentax-110 2.8 (18/24/50/70), Fujian CCTV 1.7/35, Hexanon 1.8/40 & 1.4/57, Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75, Zuiko 2.8/100, Leica Hektor 4.5/135, Sony SEL 2.8/16 & 18-55 OSS & 55-210 OSS, Sigma EX 2.8/19 & 2.8/30
Canon EOS 5D - Zenitar 2.8/16, Rokkor 2/28, Summicron-R 2.0/50, Nikkor-SC 1.2/55, Nikkor 1.8/85, Tamron 2.5/135, Elmar 4/180, Tamron 8/500,
Tamron 2.8-3.8/35-80, Sigma EX 15-30, Sigma 1.8/24, Canon EF 1.8/50, Tokina AT-X Pro 24-200 (EOS), Sigma 70-300
Canon EOS 300D - Steinheil 2.8/35, Zuiko 1.4/50, Helios-44 2/58, Jupiter-9 2/85, Vivitar S1 2.3/135
Nikon D1 & Fuji S2 Pro - Tamron 2.5/28, MIR 2/35, Jupiter-37 3.5/135, Soligor 3.5/70-220, Tamron 18-200
Nikon D3100 - Nikkor AF-S 18-55VR, AF-S 18-70, AF-S 55-200
Ricoh KR10x - Pentax-M 1.7/50, Rikenon 3.4-4.5/35-70
Nikon F - Nikkor 2.8/24, Nikkor-SC 1.4/50 a.s.a.
Asahi Spotmatic SPII: CZJ Flek 4/20, Tamron 3.5/35-70, Industar 3.5/5cm, Mamiya 1.8/55
EXA Varex - CZJ Biogon 2/58
Leica IIIa syn & Zorki-4 - (LTM lenses)

Leica C2, Minox 35 GL,Yashica Electro 35 GS, Kodak Retina Ia, Agfa Super Silette, Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim, Adox Golf 66 and some others...
Sigma DP1s, Leica Digilux 2, Lumix LC-5 & FX37, Lumix FZ20, Canon G2, Sony Mavica 300, Fuji 4800Z + 4900Z, Oly C3030, Pentax Optio S, Nikon CP950, Sony V1 & F505 a.s.m.
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://lucispictor.weebly.com | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
scsambrook



Level 3

Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 1347
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Expire: 2011-11-18

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
scsambrook wrote:
According to "The Leica Pocket Book" it was made in 1955. When it was new it cost around Ł60 in Britain (I think), equal to around Ł1200 today. It is a lovely lens, and you can unscrew the optical unit and use it on a bellows.


Interesting how much it cost back then, any idea how much the Sonnar 2/85 was?


East German gear hardly ever came into the UK in the 1950s, apart from a bit of Exakta stuff which was imported under special licences for medical and scientific laboratory use. Very few post-war West German Zeiss lenses were sold in UK in the same period because of import restrictions on high value photo (and other) goods. When the restrictions were lifted around 1959 the Contax range was already discontinued, but the Leitz 85mm f1.5 Summarex was advertised at Ł125 in 1960 - about Ł2,250 in today's values. Import duties and purchase tax were even higher then than now so that all photo gear was, relative to earnings, very, very costly. When I went to train as a librarian in 1960, my starting salary was Ł256 per annum - Very Happy

If any Forum member has USA mags from the 50s, they might give you a wider spectrum of relative prices . . .
_________________
Stephen


I use: Pentax K10D Super and Tamron 90mm f2.5 and 135mm f2.5 lenses: Leica M2 and M8 + 21/35/50/90/135 lenses. For old times' sake I keep a Vito B and a Retina IIc. And for medium format I have a Bencini Comet S and a Kodak Brownie 127.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
iangreenhalgh1



Level 4

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 9101

Expire: 2014-01-07

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers Stephen.
_________________
'The question I would really consider (especially if an amateur and on a budget) is whether or not anyone (including yourself, of course) can tell the difference in any situation for which you will use the lens...and if they can, why are they burying their noses in your prints hard enough to tell the difference instead of responding to the prints emotionally and thinking about what they might mean?' - 2F/2F on apug.org

Digital: Sony NEX-3, Samsung NX100, Canon EOS 450d
35mm SLR: Konica FT-1, Konica FC-1, Konica Autoreflex T, Carena SRH760, Exakta RTL1000, Canon EOS 10qd
35mm VF: Olympus Stylus, Konica C35, Konica A4, Konica MG, Konica MT-9, Ricoh FF-9, Ricoh AF-80
35mm RF: Zorki 6, Kiev II, Kiev IV, Contax IIIa, CZJ Werra III,
Medium format: Franka Rolfix, Mess Ikonta 524/16, Voigtlander Bessa with Skopar 3.5/105, Voigtlander Bessa with Voigtar 3.5/105, Kiev 6C, Century Graphic 23, Ensign Selfix 820, Kershaw 450
MF lenses: Schneider Angulon 6.5/68, Componon-S 5.6/100, C-Claron 4.5/135, Xenar 3.5/105, Mamiya C 2.8/45, Mamiya 2.8/80, CZJ Flektogon 4/50, Biometar 2.8/80, Zodiac 3.5/30, Tominon 4.5/135, Pullin Pulnar 2.8/100
Large Format: Ernemann HEAG Series VII version II 9x12 with Kodak Anastigmat 6.3/170
Konica Hexanons 4/21, 2.8/24, 3.5/28, 2.8/35, 1.8/40, 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 1.8/50, 3.2/135, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 4.5/300, 3.5-4.5/35-70, 4-4.6/28-135, 3.5/35-70, UC 3.5/45-100, 4/70-150, 4/65-135, UC 4/80-200. Hexars 3.5/28, 3.5/135, Konishiroku 2.8/35
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35, Skoparex 3.4/35, Tessar 2.8/50, Sonnar 1.5/50, Biotar 2/58, Pancolar 1.8/50, Cardinar 4/100, Zeiss-Opton Biogon 2.8/35
Meyer/Pentacons 2.8/28, Primagon 4.5/35, Trioplan 2.9/50, 1.8/50, 2.4/50, Primotar 3.5/50, Primotar 3.5/135
Topcon RE Auto Topcors 1.8/58, 3.5/135, 5.6/200
Russians: OKC1-18-1 2.8/18, OKC1-28-1 2.8/28, Jupiter-12 2.8/35, Jupiter-8 2/50, Industar-50 3.5/50, Industar-26M 2.8/50, Industar-22 3.5/50, Zenitar M2S 2/50, Helios-44-2, Jupiter-9 2/85, Jupiter-11 4/135, Tair-3C 4.5/300
Tokina 3.5/17, Nikon Auto Nikkor-N 2.8/24, Nikon Micro-Nikkor-P 3.5/55, Ross Xpress 3.5/4in, Ross Xpress 4/5in, Ross Xpress 4.5/8.5in, Wollensak APO-Raptar 10/541
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
ForenSeil



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 1921
Location: Kiel, Germany.


PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are also better and more epensive Leitz Elmars 90/4, for example the Elmar-C 90/4. Sells around 250€ or something like that.
Not as good as a Contax G 90/2.8 Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* but also sharp and contrasty.

Does anyone here has old catalogs with Leica-, Zeiss- or other stuff with prices?
_________________
Cameras in active use: IR/UV modified NEX-5N+EVF, NEX-C3, Pentax Q, Minolta XG9, Moskva 5 6x6 Rangefinder
Lenses in active use:
MF
Samyang 8/2.8 E-Mount, Docter-Optics Olympus 100x 1.25 finite macro lens, Tevidon 16/1.8, Tominon 17/4 (10x Macro), CZJ Tevidon 25/1.4, Novoflex Macro-Noflexar 35/3.5, Minolta MD 50/1.4, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Samyang 85/1.4, Rodagon 105/5.6, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Novoflex 400/5.6, Celestron 500mm F3.6, Novoflex 600/8
AF:
Sigma 19mm F2.8 E-Mount, Sony SEL50F18

My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
scsambrook



Level 3

Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 1347
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Expire: 2011-11-18

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forenseil - I have some 1960s Leitz material, including two English language dealer sets covering all the photographic and binocular products (hundred pages plus), and a full set of customer brochures circa 1963/4. And I have number of the general retail catalogues (known as the "Blue Book") published by the then-famous London retailer Wallace Heaton. They cover still and movie gear, binoculars, enlargers and darkroom equipment.

If people are interested I could get some of the Leica stuff scanned. I doubt Leica Camera would have any objections. The Blue books are too fragile to do on a flat-bed scanner though - they will break apart. but they could be photographed.
_________________
Stephen


I use: Pentax K10D Super and Tamron 90mm f2.5 and 135mm f2.5 lenses: Leica M2 and M8 + 21/35/50/90/135 lenses. For old times' sake I keep a Vito B and a Retina IIc. And for medium format I have a Bencini Comet S and a Kodak Brownie 127.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
ForenSeil



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 1921
Location: Kiel, Germany.


PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scsambrook wrote:
Forenseil - I have some 1960s Leitz material, including two English language dealer sets covering all the photographic and binocular products (hundred pages plus), and a full set of customer brochures circa 1963/4. And I have number of the general retail catalogues (known as the "Blue Book") published by the then-famous London retailer Wallace Heaton. They cover still and movie gear, binoculars, enlargers and darkroom equipment.

If people are interested I could get some of the Leica stuff scanned. I doubt Leica Camera would have any objections. The Blue books are too fragile to do on a flat-bed scanner though - they will break apart. but they could be photographed.


Oh some photographs of old catalog would be very nice! Smile
_________________
Cameras in active use: IR/UV modified NEX-5N+EVF, NEX-C3, Pentax Q, Minolta XG9, Moskva 5 6x6 Rangefinder
Lenses in active use:
MF
Samyang 8/2.8 E-Mount, Docter-Optics Olympus 100x 1.25 finite macro lens, Tevidon 16/1.8, Tominon 17/4 (10x Macro), CZJ Tevidon 25/1.4, Novoflex Macro-Noflexar 35/3.5, Minolta MD 50/1.4, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Samyang 85/1.4, Rodagon 105/5.6, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Novoflex 400/5.6, Celestron 500mm F3.6, Novoflex 600/8
AF:
Sigma 19mm F2.8 E-Mount, Sony SEL50F18

My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
NikonD



Level 3

Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1812
Location: Central Europe - NW Slovenija


PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

received it at last... and here it is... and its small and sharp... and I like it Smile





two photos, first wide open, second at f8




_________________
Roman
-------------------------
Sony NEX 5R
Tokina 17/3.5 RMC
Nikkor 24/2.8 Ai-S
Nikkor 35/2 K
Nikkor 50/1.4 Ai
Nikkor 55/2.8 Ai-S
Nikkor 85/1.8 H
Nikkor 105/2.5 Ai-S
Nikon 75-150/3.5 E
-------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Focus Lenses All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group