Earliest and latest versions of Zuiko 1.8/50mm

[Nesster]

Please excuse the lousy photography... I spent a while yesterday locating my old Zuikos in the boxes they were to compare to the set that came with the OM2n. Turns out my old (bought new in '84) 1.8 is the latest 'made in Japan' and the one that just came is an older silver nose one (says Made in Japan on the mount instead). There are size and other detail differences. The '84 1.8 and the 85/2 (also of the 'latest' type) are purple, while the older silver nose 1.8 and the 1.4 my brother in law got from KEH at least a decade ago are yellow-brown.

Haven't tested them to say what differences there are. These are strictly film lenses, unless and until I end up with a digital Oly or Nex.


#1

#2

#3

#4

_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica

[Nesster]

Having done some research, seems the silver nose is the earliest and the made in Japan the latest versions. I suppose I'll have to do some comparisons between the two, seems they have formula and coating differences.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica

[hoanpham]

Do they have different optical?
I think I have both from a lot years ago.

[hoacker]

There's some info in the german olypedia. Here's a link with google translation to english:
http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://olypedia.de/Zuiko_Auto-S_1:1,8/50_mm
_________________
Holger

Cameras: Canon EOS 5D, 7D, 1000Da, M
Manual lenses: Zeiss Distagon 3,5/18 ZE, Nikon PC-Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5, Olympus OM 28 f/2,0, Zeiss Distagon 2/35 ZE, Leitz Summicron-R 1:2/50, Minolta MC ROKKOR 1:1.2 f=58mm (EOS-Mod), Zeiss Planar 85 f/1,4 (C/Y), LZOS MC Jupiter-9 2/85, Meyer-Optik Görlitz Trioplan 1:2.8/100 V (Exa), Nikon Nikkor-P.C Auto 1:2.5 f=105mm, Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 1:4,5/105, Porst Tele 1:1,8/135mm MC AUTO (M42), Cosina Auto Cosinon 135mm/2.8 (M42), Makinon MC 1:5.6 300mm Reflex, LZOS MTO 1000A 10,5/1100
AF lenses: Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2,8 IS USM, Canon EF-M 22mm 1:2 STM, Canon EF 40 f/2,8 STM, Canon EF-S 60 f/2,8 USM, Canon EF 200 1:2.8L II USM, Canon EF 500 f/4L IS USM, Canon Extender 1,4x III, Sigma 50-150/2,8 EX DC APO HSM II, Sigma 150 f/2,8 HSM, Sigma APO Tele Converter 1.4x EX DG, Sigma APO Tele Converter 2x EX DG, Kenko Extension Tubes
For sale (PM me): E.Zuiko Auto-T 1:3,5 f=100mm (Pen F)
Some pictures at Flickr

[Nesster]

and here
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/shared/zuiko/htmls/50mm1a.htm
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica

[Lightshow]

From my research (F/G...)Zuiko = not multicoated, and Zuiko & Zuiko MC = multicoated.
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/shared/zuiko/htmls/50mm1a.htm
_________________
My lens list

[dnas]

As I recall, there are 4 different types.

The silver nose one, the non silver nose, the "Japan" one, and the "Made in Japan". (I have 3 out of the 4)

The "Made in Japan" seems to be the best.

[berraneck]

[Excalibur]

[Nesster]

A simple rule of Zuiko thumb: if it has letters with the word Zuiko, and says made in Japan on the mount, it's an early version. The oldest have a silver trim on their noses, the next generation doesn't. After that the markings vary, there was a "MC" phase, but Olympus never seems to have made a huge deal about multicoating (and what we call 'single coated' usually means a few coats, not literally single)... usually these later multicoated versions have Japan on the front bezel instead of the mount.

Depending on the lens model, the formula may or may not have changed along the way.

It's not to say that the oldest Zuikos are bad, not to be wanted etc. They are excellent lenses and had they been coke bottles Olympus would not have had such a hit with the OM, now would they? The vintage reviews of the early lenses are uniformly excellent. Where Olympus trailed e.g. Pentax with its SMC is in flare levels. If one is flare phobic, by all means, the later lenses are the ones to get...

I'll have to put this to the test, but I suspect a benefit of simpler coatings is the possibilty of getting some light bloom, which can be very alluring indeed. Also, e.g. with the 85, the earlier versions are softer when opened up, which can be a benefit for portraiture.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica

[runetk]

Hi

I Also have the olympus OM Zuiko "mij" 50mm f1.8 & the zuiko MC 50mm f1.4...

My experience is that those are almost identical, except the f1.4 is f1.4
And thats quite an advantage when it comes to portrait with special soft effect...

But if im making razior sharp imagest of nature etc... there is no difference.
I wonder if the soft effect is intentional, or just natures law when it comes to optics.

What I mean is most of my subjects doesn't whant razior sharp pictures of their pimples
_________________
Rune
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D mk2, Canon EOS 40D, Olympus E-PL1, Olympus OM 2s/p
Manual lenses: Olympus OM | zuiko MC 50 f/1.4, zuiko "mij" 50 f/1.8, zuiko Auto-T 1:3,5 f=135mm, Cosina 28 f2.8, Yashica ML 50mm f1.7, Yashica YUS 28mm f2.8, Soligor 75-205mm f3.5 macro | AF lenses: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, Canon EF 300mm f/4L USM, Canon Extender 1,4x I, Kenko Converter 1.5xMC ,1.4x DGX, 2xDGX, |Tamron: AF SP 11-18mm/17-35mm/17-50mm/28-75mm/70-300mm/90mm SP f2.8 / adaptal-2 80-210mm | Sigma: APO 80-400mm DG OS

[Nesster]

Yes, there seem to be two schools of lens design: ones that change character when closed down, and ones that seek to be consistently sharp all the way through. The consistently sharp designs tend to be the more expensive ones (and do well in tests) so are sought after. The other kind are maybe more useful though as you have some choice.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica