View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 11:23 pm Post subject: Lens choices around 100mm |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I hate to admit it but I have too many lenses around 100mm. The reason is partly that I wanted to collect a number of Macro lenses in order to compare them, document it here on the forum and keep the best ones. I have still to do that as I haven't bought all the necessary adapters yet.
Lenses around 100mm can have many uses. Macro, portrait, landscape, reportage and general short tele etc. Of the lenses below, would you consider some of them specialist lenses and some of them general use lenses. Weaknesses and strenghts. Which ones would you keep if you could choose only a few.
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
Samyang 85/1.4
Contax G 90/2.8
Olympus OM 90/2 Macro (1:2)
Tokina 90/2.5 Macro (1:2)
Olympus OM 100/2
Yashica ML 100/3.5 Macro (1:2)
Nikon AI-S 105/2.5
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1)
The FD is fast and sharp but very large and heavy. The OM 90/2 is relatively fast, does macro and works well as a general purpose short tele. The OM 100/2 is quite close focusing and does transitions from foreground to background extremely well. The Yashica has Zeiss pop according to what I have read, but haven't been able to test it out yet. The Samyang is a wonderful portrait lens. The Tokina is famous for its smooth bokeh and its crispness, it's also does well as a portrait lens wide open. The Contax is very sharp and small, good at infinity as well. The Nikon is the classic reportage lens and a cult classic in it's own right. The CV 125/2.5 is a bit long to fit into this group but it does everything with ease, but it's very expensive and it could be a wise move to sell it and keep a few of the other lenses instead. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 406
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Adapters are cheap. Buy them and make your own decisions based on your preferences.
I suspect most people will tell you to keep the CV yet you have already expressed an intention to sell it.
JJ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanielT74
Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
DanielT74 wrote:
Orio wrote: |
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) |
+1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BRunner
Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 705 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
BRunner wrote:
DanielT74 wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) |
+1 |
+2
+ OM 2/100 as small walk around lens. _________________ .: APO-Maniac :. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I have the FD 85/1.2 L (newer than ssc asph, same optical). Yes heavy, but worth the weight in low light or indoor.
Contax G 90/2.8, relatively small/compact on the nex. Focus can be tricky.
Lenses I don't have for the moment:
Samyang 85/1.4 has focus shift, but still for 295usd new, it's the best choice when use at f1.4.
Olympus OM 90/2 Macro (1:2). This lens will cost me an arm, approx 900usd.
Tokina 90/2.5 Macro (1:2), I have the Tamron adaptall with 2x tc. heavy but allow longer working distance with the tc 2x.
Olympus OM 100/2: no experience, but have the 100/2.8.
Yashica ML 100/3.5 Macro (1:2): no experience, but have all MF 100mm macro from pentax
Nikon AI-S 105/2.5: No experience, but trying to get the nikkor ais in f1.8
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1): This lens will cost me another arm.
Lenses I can recommend:
SmsTak85/1.8, pentax K85/1.8, pentax M85/2, pentax M100/2.8, Konica AR 100/2.8.
SuperTak85/1.9 (not as sharp as Smc wide open, but still very sharp, and one click down won't see different)
Soligor 105/2.8 (not as sharp wide open, but compact, good step down) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RTI
Joined: 15 Jul 2011 Posts: 282 Location: Moldova, Chisinau
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
RTI wrote:
Well I can't afford such lenses as OM 90/2 or the CV 125/2.5 but I'm totally pleased with my Rokinon (Samyang) 85/1.4, also have J-9. _________________ Cameras: Canon 5DIII, Zorki-4, Canon AE-1
MF:Rokkor 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 58/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.7, M39 Jupiter-9 (silver 1955), Zuiko 35-70/3.6
AF: Sigma Art 35/1.4, Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
From your list, the only one I've tried, and it's not exactly the same lens, is the Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5 in non-Ai. I really like this lens. I like it for different applications, from portrait to landscape to still life.
I also have a Panagor PMC 90mm 2.8 Macro (1:1) that I acquired recently and am still testing out but which looks promising so far. _________________ Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
BRunner wrote: |
DanielT74 wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) |
+1 |
+2
+ OM 2/100 as small walk around lens. |
This would be a very nice solution and I might actually end up with these lenses only. The FD is nice and fast but it is heavy and large and I have other f1.2 lenses that do well in low light. I have shorter macros as well so the long focal lenght of the CV doesn't bother me. The OM 100/2 is quite small and it is close focusing. I just wonder if it is any better than the OM 90/2 at anything. The smart thing to do would probably be keeping only the OM 90/2 which can do almost anything I need. I have the Contax S-Planar 60/2.8 which can do 1:1 macro if needed.
But I rarely do the smart thing, I go on emotion. So I will probably keep a fun combination and not only the OM 90/2. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015)
Last edited by Pontus on Thu May 17, 2012 9:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
It strikes me, Pontus, that you're bunching too wide a range, with the CV to your own admission. Also, from reading your comments, it sounds as if you will have a difficult time yourself parting with any of them, and certainly it doesn't make sense to sell one you haven't even experienced yet. I've been preaching to myself that one lens in a focal length is enough, but then I end up negotiating with myself when their are significant enough differences, like macro.
I only have experience with one of those - the Tokina 90/2.5, and mine is the Vivitar version. I will not sell it. When looking over your lenses again, I myself might make a case to keep them all, but if the Contax offers no better than the Tokina, I sell it. How about the OM 90/2 vs. the Tokina?
My list looks like this:
Cyclop 85/1.5
Konica 85/1.8
Series 1 90/2.5 (Tokina)
Kalejnar 100/2.8
Pentor 100/2.8
Komura 105/2.5
Tamron 105/2.5
My own rules suggest I need to make a choice between the Kalijnar and Pentor, and Komura and Tamron. I can justify, at least to myself, keeping the others, although I would sell the Cyclop if I ever find an affordable Helios. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Orio wrote: |
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) |
The FD definitely but not the CV, because its FL is too close to 135mm, and there are f1.8 135mm lenses about.
The Nikon 105mm f2.5 Ai-S is a keeper too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
All are great (FD 85/1.2 SSC Aspherical and
CV 125/2.5 maybe the best) but for NEX would definitely recommend the Contax G 90/2.8 Sonnar T* as it's the most compact lens.
It's as said compact, contrasty, sharp like hell and has also a comparable fair price for such a good lens.
Look at a 100% crop from it
100% crop from 16 megapixel 5N sensor:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54671350@N02/6890427734/sizes/o/in/photostream/ _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
I just came across Nikon 105 2.5 AI-s and Samyang 85 1.4, both in good condition and very nearly the same price. Which one would you recommend, provided there is little more to choose from locally? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Both are good but very different. The shorter focal lenght of the Samyang is welcome for most shooters (if you only have one lens in this range) and it is a lot faster. The Samyang is actually very sharp even at f1.4 The Samyang is a much larger lens though and it is nowhere as well built as the Nikon. The Nikon is an absolute joy to use and the built in lens shade comes handy. The Nikon will probably hold it's value better than the Samyang. I would say that you can't go wrong with either lens but I think I would choose the Nikon.
Btw, I just remembered that I have the X-fujinon 100/2.8 as well. How does this lens fit in with the already long list of quality lenses. Is it a keeper because of its quality or is it more of a collectors item as it is so rare. People have mentioned this lens as a standout in the Fujinon line. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
My first thought was Nikon too, all I worry about is how it will manage in relatively dark places. I used to use my AF Nikkor 50 1.8 for this purpose and it was not really performing if closed to say 2.8. AF got totally crazy so I tried manual focus on a few occasions and 50mm was a bit too short. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
If you are looking for a low light lens, I guess you should choose the Samyang. Just remember that the depth of field is extremely thin at 85mm and f1.4 though and depending on your camera it will be difficult to focus correctly. Focus peaking helps, if your camera supports it. If you rely on a traditional viewfinder, you would benefit from a focusing screen optimised for MF. These are available for some cameras. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanielT74
Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
DanielT74 wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
BRunner wrote: |
DanielT74 wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
FD 85/1.2 SSC Asph
CV 125/2.5 Macro (1:1) |
+1 |
+2
+ OM 2/100 as small walk around lens. |
This would be a very nice solution and I might actually end up with these lenses only. The FD is nice and fast but it is heavy and large and I have other f1.2 lenses that do well in low light. I have shorter macros as well so the long focal lenght of the CV doesn't bother me. The OM 100/2 is quite small and it is close focusing. I just wonder if it is any better than the OM 90/2 at anything. The smart thing to do would probably be keeping only the OM 90/2 which can do almost anything I need. I have the Contax S-Planar 60/2.8 which can do 1:1 macro if needed.
But I rarely do the smart thing, I go on emotion. So I will probably keep a fun compination and not only the OM 90/2. |
Well, if you want small and money is no object, you can get the new Leica Macro-Elmar 90/4 which is very small and as sharp as they get, plus with the macro adapter and Hawk's M-Nex adapter you might get close to 1:1 macro. But you'll be out of pocket by 3k if you are lucky.
Alternatively you could get the old Leica Elmar 9cm collapsible which is a very nice lens but prone to flare like anything. It's pretty small and cheap but not really light though - they didn't skim on the metal in those days! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
DanielT74 wrote: |
Alternatively you could get the old Leica Elmar 9cm collapsible which is a very nice lens but prone to flare like anything. It's pretty small and cheap but not really light though - they didn't skim on the metal in those days! |
On digital bodys most collapsible lenses are not really colapsible. But the Elmar(-C) lenses are indeed very small, useful and compact
I have both Carl Zeiss Sonnar 90/2.8 T* (Contax G Mount, ~1994) and Leitz Elmar-C 90/4 (Leica M Mount, ~1974)
The Elmar-C is very good but but the younger Sonnar is a tack better and the length and the price both lenses is almost identical.
The Sonnar gives you an extra stop and slightly better image quality for the same money but the Elmar gives you better haptics when used an an digital camera (and a very different bokeh bye the way).
Overall I would clearly choose the Sonnar for use on mirrorless digital camera like NEX, MFT etc. while I would choose the Elmar if you maybe wan't to use a rangefinder in future or you can get it much cheaper than the Sonnar. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eugen Mezei
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eugen Mezei wrote:
What I ever wonder: Does it really make sense at all selling lenses?
First you will never get the time you invested (for researching before buying and then for testing it after) out in term of money. But let's say that is already wasted time.
Asking yourself which one to sell, only the time invested into this process is more expensive (in terms of what you can gain in the same period in your regular job) than what you will get out as fluidities from the selling.
Ofcourse this all apply to lenses you found to suit you.
So when I look at my lenses and think I have too much of them I better go and work an hour supplimentary and the problem is solved. Why to think about it, lenses don't need to be fed. Almost paradoxally they consume less financial investment if I let them sit than trying to sell them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|