View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:09 am Post subject: Ludwig Meritar 2.9/50 on NEX-3 |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I'm surprised by this lens, a simple little triplet that cost 6ukp:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Congrats on new toy! Is #2 a crop? The borders look very decent.
These are cute lenses, I was eying them a number of times, but managed to convince myself that I don't need them as they don't have anything special except the cute look. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
No, they are all uncropped. I too am surprised by the corner performance, I would have expected it to be sharp in the centre with weak corners. Of course, this is on an APS-C sensor so we aren't really seeing the corners and at f5.6 of f8 as these were (apart from the post, which is wide open) most lenses are good.
I need to play with this one more, it's clearly a capable little thing and I suspect it has some nice character wide open to explore. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I use on full frame - It's good from 5.6 onwards. It's not ever pin sharp but it's acceptably sharp at all apertures and crazy bokeh wide open. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Neil Purling
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:44 pm Post subject: Re: Ludwig Meritar 2.9/50 |
|
|
Neil Purling wrote:
I would really like to see someone else's work with one of these lenses on a full-frame sensor or negative scans.
They were slagged off as being such a stinker of a lens in old issues of A.P. I just had to have one.
What I want to know if the problems were down to poor assembly or if the optics were just plain bad even when properly assembled.
Here are some wide-open shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29909805@N04/7197268742/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29909805@N04/7197344640/in/photostream
It can behave itself when stopped down:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29909805@N04/7197383918/in/photostream _________________ Leica IIIa c/w 50/3.5 Elmar and several Soviet lenses: J12, J8, Ind 22 & Ind 61LD
Nikon FE with 55/3.5 Micro-Nikkor, 50/1.8 Nikkor AIS 'pancake' and 50mm f2 Arsat-H (nikon AI)
Praktica MTL5 with 30mm f3.5 Lydith, 50/2.9 Meritar, 50mm f2.8 Domiplan, 50mm f3.5 Industar, 58mm Helios & 55mm f1.8 Takumar
Yashica Mat TLR
4x5 Crown Graphic with 6" Beck Biplanat rapid-rectilinear in a Copal #1 & 127mm f4.7 Ektar in Supermatic shutter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I'll have to stick my copy on my Exakta RTL1000 and shoot some film with it. If it can do quite well on the NX then it should be fine on film too. I did have a Domiplan to which to compare it but it fell apart, typical for the Domiplan. I have a Trioplan 50 but it's in Altix mount and I don't have an Altix. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hexaddict
Joined: 30 Apr 2012 Posts: 81 Location: Carbonne / SW France
Expire: 2014-05-31
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hexaddict wrote:
Under a not so easy light condition you did very interesting pictures. I would say something like "coloured black & white pictures".
there is an automnal ton with rich details and textures. _________________ Didier
Oly OM-D E-M1 + AF 12-40 f2.8 + AF pana 7-14 f4
______________________________
Hexanon: 21/4 24/2.8 28/3.5 40/1.8 50/1.4 55/3.5 135/2.5 135/3.2 200/4 65-135/4
Helios: 44M-4 135/2.8
Industar: M-61 53/2.8
CZJ: tessar 50/2.8
Fujinon: 55/2.2 X-fuji 50/1.6
CZ: Planar 50/1.8 (singapore) Planar HFT 50/1.8
Rolleinar: 35/2.8 85/2.8 105/2.8
Yashinon 45mm 1.4 (mod)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Thankyou, the conditions were quite unfavourable but the lens did not bad with them. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I found the lens to be quite vibrant. It seemed to work better on closer subjects and not at infinity. I've used it on film and found it lacking lacking in contrast which may account for the rep, but DSLR is great, just use a hood and give a bit extra contrast in PP. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|