View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Paul A
Joined: 20 Jun 2012 Posts: 39 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: "Hot Lens" Takumars..which ones? |
|
|
Paul A wrote:
I've read that only the older Auto-Tak (8 element [and not 7 element: Super Tack, S.-M.-C, SMC)] 50/1.4 and the 30/2 are hot but i've seen 55 1/8 being 'tested' and passing (hot hot hot) with glowing colors ).
How do we know what's really what?
I'm interested in a 50 1/4 (and a 300/4). Is there any (M42) version 50/1.4 that is not a Hot lens? I am assuming/hoping that the (M42)300/4 does not come in Hot lens in any version.?.
Thanks,
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
Based on 1st hand measurements:
- At least some 7-element 50mm f/1.4 S-M-C Takumars are radioactive.
- At least some 55/1.8 S-M-C Takumars are radioactive
- At least some older 55/1.8 Takumars (zebra version) are not radioactive
I've read that the early 50/1.4 8-element Super-Takumar is not radioactive, and that the 50/1.4 SMC Takumar is radioactive. The radioactive 50/1.4 Takumars are among the more radioactive lenses that I've measured, but I dont have any Medium or large format lenses (Aero Ektars, for example).
Here's a video where someone measures radioactivity (or lack of it) from some assorted Takumars:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZeqOwv00jI _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Almost all the Super and S-M-C 50/1.4's (7-element) are, I understand. They suffer from the browning or yellowing, which is caused by radioactivity. The early 8-element Super Takumar is rather rare.
I rather like the idea they are radioactive. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
I rather like the idea they are radioactive. |
+1 _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10543 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome Paul A
The previous forum threads are at http://forum.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=radioactive _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
I can confirm that my S-M-C 50mm f/1.4, SMC 50mm f/1.4, S-M-C 55mm f/1.8, and Super 55mm f/2 are all radioactive.
If it really matters to you, I suggest the EBC Fujinon 50mm f/1.4. The EBC version is not radioactive, nor is the new style non-EBC with black aperture ring. (Only the old-style non-EBC with silver-coloured aperture ring is radioactive.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul A
Joined: 20 Jun 2012 Posts: 39 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:04 pm Post subject: thanx guys...also SMC 50 1.4 vs Hexanon 50 1.4.... |
|
|
Paul A wrote:
i called a local fellow selling some SMC Taks of all sizes(of which i'm interested in the 300 f/4 and the 50 1.4)...i mentioned I had some Konica and he said he did too (but not listed).
He has a 50 1.4 AR.
I imagine the SMC Tak is better bokeh (8 blades vs 6) but how about contrast/color/sharpness?
Also..I have a Hexanon 57mm 1.2 that is a "Hot" lens I'm sure but I can not find thorium/lanthanum info about the Konicas like I can about the Taks.
Is the Hexanon 50 1.4 a nuke too? I know it is a much later lens than the 57 1.2/57 1.4 but still in the days of Thorium, no?
Thanks again,
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Smoli4
Joined: 01 Jul 2011 Posts: 606 Location: Haifa, Israel
Expire: 2013-06-07
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smoli4 wrote:
hehe i just read a whole thread Orio has started in 2007 about radioactive lenses, and he actually said the exact same thing i wondered today about storing lenses in your house.
well when i finished reading that thread i remembered that Today(!) I discovered an old lens shop (when i thought there where only two in my city) and i talked to the owner, so the owner is 80+ years old, he owns that store for about 50 years if not more, and the store is Packed from buttom up with lenses... i cant even imagine how many of those are radioactive.... so yeah.. something to think about. _________________ Canon 6D + Mir 24, SMC Tak 50 f1.4, 135 f2.5 V2, Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 52B, mcMTO 500 8, Canon IS USM 75-300 4.5-5.6, zeiss ikon talon 85 f2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JBruja
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Posts: 21 Location: North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:52 pm Post subject: SMC Tak radioactive |
|
|
JBruja wrote:
After reading this forum I decided to measure the radioactivity of my SMC Tak f1.4 50mm sn 7357201 (m42 mount). The rear element reads 527 McRh averaging 2 samples @ 30sec ea. with the Geiger-Mueller tube approx 3/8" from the glass. The counter housing prevented me from getting any closer. The front element registers about 117 McHr. As reference the background reading is 4 - 7 McRh.
In any case these levels are extremely low. A Coleman lantern mantle will produce a reading of over 350McRh. As far as "hot" lenses these are only luke warm but great performers. I have several other lenses that produce interesting reading also. _________________ Quoting a retired member of the Canadian RCMP:
"Canada - a place where men are men - and the sheep are worried !" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JBruja
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Posts: 21 Location: North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: Re: thanx guys...also SMC 50 1.4 vs Hexanon 50 1.4.... |
|
|
JBruja wrote:
Paul A wrote: |
i called a local fellow selling some SMC Taks of all sizes(of which i'm interested in the 300 f/4 and the 50 1.4)...i mentioned I had some Konica and he said he did too (but not listed).
He has a 50 1.4 AR.
I imagine the SMC Tak is better bokeh (8 blades vs 6) but how about contrast/color/sharpness?
Also..I have a Hexanon 57mm 1.2 that is a "Hot" lens I'm sure but I can not find thorium/lanthanum info about the Konicas like I can about the Taks.
Is the Hexanon 50 1.4 a nuke too? I know it is a much later lens than the 57 1.2/57 1.4 but still in the days of Thorium, no?
Thanks again,
Paul |
My Hexanon AR 50mm f1.4 registers nothing over the normal background level for both the front & back elements _________________ Quoting a retired member of the Canadian RCMP:
"Canada - a place where men are men - and the sheep are worried !" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul A
Joined: 20 Jun 2012 Posts: 39 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:06 am Post subject: Re: thanx guys...also SMC 50 1.4 vs Hexanon 50 1.4.... |
|
|
Paul A wrote:
[quote="JBruja"]
Paul A wrote: |
i called a local fellow selling some SMC Taks of all sizes(of which i'm interested in the 300 f/4 and the 50 1.4)...i mentioned I had some Konica and he said he did too (but not listed).
He has a 50 1.4 AR.
I imagine the SMC Tak is better bokeh (8 blades vs 6) but how about contrast/color/sharpness?
Also..I have a Hexanon 57mm 1.2 that is a "Hot" lens I'm sure but I can not find thorium/lanthanum info about the Konicas like I can about the Taks.
Is the Hexanon 50 1.4 a nuke too? I know it is a much later lens than the 57 1.2/57 1.4 but still in the days of Thorium, no?
Thanks again,
Paul |
"My Hexanon AR 50mm f1.4 registers nothing over the normal background level for both the front & back elements"
ahh Sweet.. thanks JBruja
BTW some say these hot lenses of ours are no worse than eating a banana...
next time you feel like sweeping one your lenses go ahead and do a banana too will ya? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JBruja
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Posts: 21 Location: North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:30 am Post subject: Re: thanx guys...also SMC 50 1.4 vs Hexanon 50 1.4.... |
|
|
JBruja wrote:
[quote="Paul A"]
JBruja wrote: |
Paul A wrote: |
i called a local fellow selling some SMC Taks of all sizes(of which i'm interested in the 300 f/4 and the 50 1.4)...i mentioned I had some Konica and he said he did too (but not listed).
He has a 50 1.4 AR.
I imagine the SMC Tak is better bokeh (8 blades vs 6) but how about contrast/color/sharpness?
Also..I have a Hexanon 57mm 1.2 that is a "Hot" lens I'm sure but I can not find thorium/lanthanum info about the Konicas like I can about the Taks.
Is the Hexanon 50 1.4 a nuke too? I know it is a much later lens than the 57 1.2/57 1.4 but still in the days of Thorium, no?
Thanks again,
Paul |
"My Hexanon AR 50mm f1.4 registers nothing over the normal background level for both the front & back elements"
ahh Sweet.. thanks JBruja
BTW some say these hot lenses of ours are no worse than eating a banana...
next time you feel like sweeping one your lenses go ahead and do a banana too will ya? |
The bananas are just ripening now so I swept one from the local store and came up with only 9 McRh. HOWEVER a mango which my wife picked up yesterday came in at 13 McRh !! WOW !! still nothing. There's not much else to do here at 5:30AM. _________________ Quoting a retired member of the Canadian RCMP:
"Canada - a place where men are men - and the sheep are worried !" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul A
Joined: 20 Jun 2012 Posts: 39 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul A wrote:
Thanks Jbruja.
BTW-it must be on the other side of Canada where sheep live a worried life. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
My 50/1.4 S-M-C Tak does suffer yellowing which I can clear with UV, but my 55/1.8 S-M-C doesn't suffer at all, so I'm not sure that one is radioactive. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
My 50/1.4 S-M-C Tak does suffer yellowing which I can clear with UV, but my 55/1.8 S-M-C doesn't suffer at all, so I'm not sure that one is radioactive. |
Not all radioactive lenses seem to turn yellow. Examples I have are the Olympus 50/1.4 (early), and the S-M-C 55/1.8
If you look at section 2) of this link:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/s58y/6802092736/in/photostream
the S-M-C 55/1.8 and the Olympus 50/1.4 emit only about 1/5 the gamma radioactivity of the S-M-C 50/1.4 -- measured at some distance from the lens. _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TLN
Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
TLN wrote:
My Super-Takumar is not radioactive. Early and rare 50 1.4 version. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
TLN wrote: |
My Super-Takumar is not radioactive. Early and rare 50 1.4 version. |
Could you post a picture of the lens in case someone wants to look for this specific version? =)
How did measure the radioactivity? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|