Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Smallest pocket camera with 28mm
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:56 pm    Post subject: Smallest pocket camera with 28mm Reply with quote

What do you think would be the smallest pocket camera with a sharp 28mm or wider lens? Strictly film camera, of course Wink

I'm looking for a take-everywhere camera. I really like the Rollei 35B, but at 40mm the lens is not wide enough.


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fed-2,Zorki-C +Orion-15 (28mm lens)
Bessa L +15mm Heliar


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My favourite 'pocket' cameras are the Ricoh GR1 and Olympus MjuII... although that's 35mm isn't it... The Ricoh then...


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ricoh GR1 series, all had a 28mm f2.8 lens, retractable, built-in lens cover. Dang, Xpres beat me
to it!

Let's see how you style in town with a Bessa L and Heliar jammed in your pocket. Laughing


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not extremely small, but something like this?

chinon pocket dual AF-P by Nesster, on Flickr

There was a vogue of dual focal length compacts, before the zooms took over, where often the wide is 28mm. I'm not familiar with all the different models possible so I don't know which would be the smallest of these.


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
Fed-2,Zorki-C +Orion-15 (28mm lens)
Bessa L +15mm Heliar
Too big Wink and Bessa L expensive Surprised


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GR1 looks sweet Cool It's now on my "possible" list Wink


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nesster wrote:
Not extremely small, but something like this?

chinon pocket dual AF-P by Nesster, on Flickr

There was a vogue of dual focal length compacts, before the zooms took over, where often the wide is 28mm. I'm not familiar with all the different models possible so I don't know which would be the smallest of these.
What does it perform like?


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not too bad - I like the 'panorama' mode... I seem to recall seeing Minolta, Canon etc dual focal length compacts as well


GROM, Carmine st, Chinon Dual-Af-P by Nesster, on Flickr


Cadillac, rear view by Nesster, on Flickr



BAR by Nesster, on Flickr


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crikey, the IQ is really good Shocked I'm not sure why I'm surprised, but I am - pleasantly so. I'll add it to the "possibles" list. Thanks for the examples Cool


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Smallest pocket camera with 28mm Reply with quote

GrahamNR17 wrote:
What do you think would be the smallest pocket camera with a sharp 28mm or wider lens? Strictly film camera, of course Wink


Widest must be the 21mm Ricoh GR21. The Ricoh R1 (GR1 predecessor) had a 24mm panoramic mode. My favourite in the range would be the Fuji Zoom Date f2.8 (a.k.a. Silvi), which has a 2.8/24-5.6/50 zoom. Past that there are quite a few 28mm (or 28mm-whatever zoom) compacts.


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Olympus XA4
http://www.cameraquest.com/xa4.htm

Fujifilm DL Super Mini / Tiara
http://www.troeszter.net/SuperMiniPage.html

Nikon AF600
http://www.nicovandijk.net/compact.htm

...


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks chaps, I've set some "saved searches" in my fleabay and will see which of the suggestions crops up Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget the Fuji DL Zoom - 28 to 50mm, very sharp at the wide end and not bad at the longer. I managed to break mine a while ago, which was a pity. Theres also a later version going from 24 to 50. I have one somewhere . . . stored safely somewhere in the house!


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scsambrook wrote:
Don't forget the Fuji DL Zoom - 28 to 50mm, very sharp at the wide end and not bad at the longer. I managed to break mine a while ago, which was a pity. Theres also a later version going from 24 to 50. I have one somewhere . . . stored safely somewhere in the house!
You need to be careful of safe places Shocked


PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scsambrook wrote:
Don't forget the Fuji DL Zoom - 28 to 50mm, very sharp at the wide end and not bad at the longer. I managed to break mine a while ago, which was a pity. Theres also a later version going from 24 to 50. I have one somewhere . . . stored safely somewhere in the house!


I've yet to finish the roll, but hope to see some good results. Zoom goes from 28-56mm:



Also called the Tiara in EevrOpah. Smile


PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes- that's the one. Great camera.


PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

However Nikon Lite touch Zoom 70WS has 28 - 70mm AF (5.6 - 10) is an option I would prefer the guess focusing Olympus XA4 (28mm 3.5) for most applications.

Other zoom with more features then the Nikon: Minolta 70W (28 - 70 AF, 3.5 - 8.4).


Last edited by Minolfan on Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:41 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nikon Lite Touch


PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some more to choose:
http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/35mmwide/wide3.html


PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Smallest pocket camera with 28mm Reply with quote

GrahamNR17 wrote:
What do you think would be the smallest pocket camera with a sharp 28mm or wider lens? Strictly film camera, of course Wink

I'm looking for a take-everywhere camera. I really like the Rollei 35B, but at 40mm the lens is not wide enough.

+1 about liking the Rollei 35; the mechanical parts will remain usable/repairable long after many electronics-based cameras have expired Wink

Not the smallest, but for 28mm I like the Olympus XA4.
For a 'cheap and cheerful' 28mm point-and-shoot, the Olympus Trip 505 can be found, at the time of writing, in the UK, new at almost 'thrift shop' prices. It has a glass triplet lens, and the built-in flash can be turned off.


PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Minolfan wrote:
Some more to choose:
http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/35mmwide/wide3.html


Argh! Now I want an orange Konica Off-road.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85496

Thank you. Mad Smile


PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kansalliskala wrote:
Minolfan wrote:
Some more to choose:
http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/35mmwide/wide3.html


Argh! Now I want an orange Konica Off-road.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85496

Thank you. Mad Smile
That's probably one of the ugliest cameras I have ever seen Shocked You are a sick man Laughing


PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I finally found something. A bit different to what I was really looking for. I found a mint Canon Sure Shot A1 for 4.99 GBP. Lens is 32mm, so not as wide as I wanted. But seeing as it is for use when I am out walking the dogs or out riding a bike ride, I don't need to worry about it getting wet, or if I fall in a river Confused

Click here to see on Ebay


PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not very small! But funny indeed. Congrats!
I have a Konica Mermaid for that kind of work, with 35mm 3.5.