| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16544
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:16 pm Post subject: I want it just for that serial number!!! |
 |
|
kds315* wrote:
Looks shabby I know, but that serial number is as must have!! Click here to see on Ebay
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anscochrome
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 115
Location: Omaha, NE
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: I want it just for that serial number!!! |
|
|
anscochrome wrote:
I like the description "clean optics". From the photo, looks totally pitted out to me. If that is clean, I'd hate to see well worn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 1397
Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
Nice serial! My father still has the Nikkor 35/2.8 he received as a gift from my mother ages ago, with the serial exactly matching the phone number he had at the time. What are the odds of that? 
_________________
My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 1120
Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:40 am Post subject: Re: I want it just for that serial number!!! |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
| anscochrome wrote: |
| I like the description "clean optics". From the photo, looks totally pitted out to me. If that is clean, I'd hate to see well worn. |
You saw a photo? I keep getting "image unavailable". Oh yeah, I'll blow a few thousand bucks, sight unseen! Hold me back!
_________________
Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 800
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 10:12 am Post subject: Re: I want it just for that serial number!!! |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
| RioRico wrote: |
Oh yeah, I'll blow a few thousand bucks, sight unseen! Hold me back! |
be sure if you see those photos, you never will "blow a few thousand bucks" 
_________________
Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ramon
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 71
Location: Kent, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ramon wrote:
I can't believe the description:
(B) Good User Condition / small signs of USE / Clean Optics
I think I would rate it:
Extremely poor condition / Large signs of abuse / messy looking optics
If they rate this a B then I wouldn't want a C rated one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
saffersteve
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 91
Location: London
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
saffersteve wrote:
LOL......I have never laught so hard.
is that the Serial scrached out on the front? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 398
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
| saffersteve wrote: |
| is that the Serial scrached out on the front? |
klaus, I can make exactly the same serial number on your K. 32/1.9 if you want. Just send it to me... 
_________________
"Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16544
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Well guys, of course it want meant rather ironical, as that serial number
was scratched off and the whole thing is in pitiful condition anyway 
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011
Posts: 1177
Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
Jeez, looks like Frankenstiens neck with that bolt sticking out  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 1120
Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
I still can't get the picture. Just as well. I might laugh. I mught bust a gut. That would be messy.
_________________
Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fabian
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 254
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fabian wrote:
| Ramon wrote: |
| If they rate this a B then I wouldn't want a C rated one. |
Heck, even an A-rated one would be dubious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 800
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
| RioRico wrote: |
| I still can't get the picture. Just as well. I might laugh. I mught bust a gut. That would be messy. |
try this... or maybe better not
http://i.imgur.com/UVyvn.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/HxXmO.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/k0P1q.jpg
_________________
Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
That leica-post really has balls of steel. Anyone keeping track of Ebay usernames changes?
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 566
Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 5:12 pm Post subject: nr.1 |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
how about this number: 10 0001 Kinoptik 100\2: first of its kind?
p. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9097
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: Re: nr.1 |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
| paulhofseth wrote: |
how about this number: 10 0001 Kinoptik 100\2: first of its kind?http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201112/4029_100001L_1.jpg
|
Clickable:
http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201112/4029_100001L_1.jpg
I'd say you're right. Now that puppy's probably worth something to a collector.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 566
Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:53 pm Post subject: not a musum piece |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
there is a small detached stray black metal?plastic? inside by the aperture, so I doubt that it is in full museum quality. Fine pictures though.
p. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
