View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 244 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 8:53 am Post subject: Color temperature difference between film and digital? |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
First of all, not sure this is the right place for this question. Second, this is a question out of curiosity, I don't have a stake in the outcome.
The other day I came across the following:
https://crawfordphotoschool.com/shooting-techniques/color-meters-1.php
where on that and the next few pages the author appears to say that color temperature in kelvin is or should be applied somewhat differently depending whether you are using film or digital. See for example page 3 of that article where it is shown that the Sekonic C-700 (which I don't own) has modes for digital and film that give slightly different readings of color temperature.
Why would this be so? I can imagine types and brands of film stock behaving differently from each other, but for the same measure I would not be surprised if different digital sensors have slightly varying behaviors to color temperature. So why specifically digital versus film? Perhaps related to digital being linear 0-255 and film / analog having non-linear behavior?
To be clear, I don't need a device that gives me color temperature. For me this is strictly intellectual curiosity.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1268 Location: Kent, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
I would imagine that the combination of the colour filters used on digital sensors + the photosites themselves have a different spectral response characteristic than that of traditional colour film. The film vs digital mode on some of those colour meters will probably partly correct for that difference as the colour temperature of the illumination changes.
This correction may be even more important when the light source is not pure black-body radiation, but spectral in nature, which these days it often is with CFL and LED light sources.
But I agree with you; whilst a film/digital mode setting may be able to address this partially, I would imagine that in reality colour correction would very much be dependent on both the specific spectral nature of the illumination as well as the spectral response characteristic of the specific maker's and model sensor. Not much different really from some scanners coming with canned colour profiles for colour film vs reversal(slide) film whereas really what you would need is maker, model, and ideally batch-specific profiles.
To be honest, with digital cameras these days offering in-camera white-balance calibration given a neutral test-target, I struggle to see the major value of a colour meter these days unless you are still shooting both film & digital and are looking for best colour consistency across both.
In practice I find all this a bit pointless anyway given the metamerism problems displayed of so many surfaces, paints & dyes under spectral LED lighting. Even LED lighting with a very high CRI is no guarantee for colour matching given the inappropriately small number of colour swatches used in determining a LED's CRI rating. Hence I tend to adjust to something that looks good rather than try to get to an impossible to achieve consistent "exact" colour rendition. I mean, what is the "correct" colour rendition of an Alexandrite gemstone???, a very similar problem really. _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2494
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I don't see much use for colour meters when shooting film unless you can control your light source with filters, like in a studio. For digital maybe but you can also use your camera for that. Maybe it is more accurate, but accurate is not what your eyes see anyway. They always adjust a bit to a less extreme value. My camera adjusts in increments of 50 kelvin. green/magenta in increments of 1 whatever scale is used for that. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10541 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Would be of interest to see comparison of color meter reading of white card and custom wb setting camera uses when set for photo of white card, and wb setting of software when white card in frame is chosen as reference. I seem to get best wb with the last method. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Well, in terms of intellectual curiosity only, I was taught many years ago that the color temperature of the sun is 5600 k and that the color temp of your average studio incandescent flood was 3200 k.
I owned a Gossen color meter for a while, but I never used it except for playing around with it on occasion. It was a pretty cool unit. I ended up selling it to a friend who just had to have it.
Back in my film days, probably 90% or better of my photography was done outdoors, so I didn't feel much of a need to pay attention to the color temperature of a scene. Hey, if it was late in the afternoon or early in the morning, where the color temp was lower, I just included that "feature" as part of the ambiance. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10541 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Camera set to "Daylight" WB can also show color rendition differences among lenses; essentially equivalent to using Daylight film. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|