Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Rather shocking images, in fact I'm apologising now
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:36 am    Post subject: Rather shocking images, in fact I'm apologising now Reply with quote

Yup, I'm really really sorry about these images. I hope that you'll find it in your hearts to forgive me. I especially don't want to upset Attila, any of the mods, any of the lady members, or any of the gentlemanly members here (that about covers all of you I think).
I didn't set out to capture shocking images but sometimes, you know, it just happens; that's my guilty plea in mitigation, it just happened. I'm sorry.

So, in the interests of complete honesty, here is my confession and apology:

I forgot which MF lens I used to take these images.

I hope you'll find it in your hearts to forgive me.










PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are very nice images but now, if we try and guess the lens, you won't know if we are right!


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

***I forgot which MF lens I used to take these images.***


Well I reckon it's one of these:-
Canon 100-400L, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Canon 16-35L, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 1.4 extender, ringflash, Canon 580 ExII, Sigeye 8mm f/4.0

28mm: Sigma Z f/2.8
35mm: Canon FLf/3.5, Canon FD f/3.5 S.C.
50mm: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar f/2.8, Super Takumar f/1.4, Ricoh Rikenon f/2, Vivitar MC f/1.7, Steinheil-Auto-Cassaron f/2.8,
Canon FL Macro f/3.5,
55mm Canon FL f/1.2 EOS mount by trifox
90mm Roeschlein-Kreuznach Telenar f/3.8
135mm: Carl Zeiss Jena MC S f/3.5, Sigma Z f/3.5 minitele, Sigma Z f/2.8Pan, Meyer Optik Orestor 2.8, Canon FD f/2.5 S.C. EOS mount by trifox
200mm: Sigma f/3.5 Scalematic fine focus, Soligor f/4.5, Auto Chinon f/3.5, Canon FD f/4 S.S.C.
300mm: Soligor telephoto f/5.5,
400mm: Sigma Z f/5.6


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same with dementia, I also have every day. Fortunately, to find a home


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IM can help a bit, it's going to be one in bold font! It's not the one in italics because it hadn't arrived then.

Excalibur wrote:
***I forgot which MF lens I used to take these images.***

Well I reckon it's one of these:-
Canon 100-400L, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Canon 16-35L, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 1.4 extender, ringflash, Canon 580 ExII, Sigeye 8mm f/4.0
28mm: Sigma Z f/2.8
35mm: Canon FLf/3.5, Canon FD f/3.5 S.C.
50mm: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar f/2.8, Super Takumar f/1.4, Ricoh Rikenon f/2, Vivitar MC f/1.7, Steinheil-Auto-Cassaron f/2.8,
Canon FL Macro f/3.5,
55mm Canon FL f/1.2 EOS mount by trifox

90mm Roeschlein-Kreuznach Telenar f/3.8
135mm: Carl Zeiss Jena MC S f/3.5, Sigma Z f/3.5 minitele, Sigma Z f/2.8Pan, Meyer Optik Orestor 2.8, Canon FD f/2.5 S.C. EOS mount by trifox
200mm: Sigma f/3.5 Scalematic fine focus, Soligor f/4.5, Auto Chinon f/3.5, Canon FD f/4 S.S.C.
300mm: Soligor telephoto f/5.5,
400mm: Sigma Z f/5.6


I'm going towards the FL f/1.2 Trifox conversion but I'm still not sure.


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A member has the tag line "I put that lens away, never to be found again."

Now I know what that means! Laughing

I hope you can find it again... Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damn, thought there would be nudity.


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

woodrim wrote:
Damn, thought there would be nudity.


Why? Surely you don't find nudity to be shocking? Embarassed


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think anyone would if it was me!


PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

according to jeffrey's exif viewer
http://regex.info//exif.cgi

the shots were taken with a 50mm lens....unless that's the 'default' exif with the adapter and the body you used, 50D II...


PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

woodrim wrote:
Damn, thought there would be nudity.


+1