| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:56 am Post subject: 85/1.8 Nikkor-H goes to the park |
 |
|
mfkita wrote:
I wanted to take just one lens and see what I could get...knowing I was limited in getting close-up...but it turned out just fine...
These are NEAR 100% crops (just to have SOME space around the birds) with my 85mm/F1.8 MF Nikkor on Canon 40D...
(left edge) @ F5.6 - 8 (?)
@ f2.8...
_________________
I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive
Last edited by mfkita on Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:23 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 3216
Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Crisp and clear the first one.
The second one, ISO 1000 appears to be too much.
_________________
Moderator Himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
| Himself wrote: |
Crisp and clear the first one.
The second one, ISO 1000 appears to be too much. |
ISO is what it is...to get the shot or not....that and the major cropping (it is nearly a 100% crop) = some noise I can accept....
It was in the shade, and I had to use high ISO to stop the action (1/2000 sec) and have at least a little depth of field (f2.8 )....
_________________
I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
The second shot, noise or not, with the eye peeking through the wing. Perfect capture IMHO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6624
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
The first one is incredible for a 100% crop!
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| The first one is incredible for a 100% crop! |
The ibis is ISO 400...and shot in nice contrasty light...( vs. the ringneck dove shot in flat shade @ ISO 1000)...
_________________
I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
| martyn_bannister wrote: |
| The second shot, noise or not, with the eye peeking through the wing. Perfect capture IMHO |
...and perfectly lucky, I admit....but that's part of why I like SLR photography......with SLR flapping mirror photography you never know exactly what you'll get....
...and with less than pro-line DSLRs the extra delay of even milcroseconds is critical in action shots like this one...
The dove looks like a women peeking through a fan doesn't it...
_________________
I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 3216
Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
If you shoot RAW, you can fix 3/4 of the noise in camera raw. At least 3/4.
_________________
Moderator Himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
| mfkita wrote: |
| martyn_bannister wrote: |
| The second shot, noise or not, with the eye peeking through the wing. Perfect capture IMHO |
...and perfectly lucky, I admit....but that's part of why I like SLR photography......with SLR flapping mirror photography you never know exactly what you'll get....
...and with less than pro-line DSLRs the extra delay of even milcroseconds is critical in action shots like this one...
The dove looks like a women peeking through a fan doesn't it... |
Of course perfectly lucky. There is no way you could anticipate and react to a shot like that. But you got it. With the head in focus and the wing OOF. Which is the main thing  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
| Himself wrote: |
| If you shoot RAW, you can fix 3/4 of the noise in camera raw. At least 3/4. |
It was shot RAW...I just don't like to use NR...I did use a bit of background 'blur' in PS but DPP-NR reduces sharpness of the entire image...
If I had a program in which I could isolate background in RAW and use NR there, I would, but I don't yet have any software that can do that.
And on my monitor, and others I've looked at, the noise isn't objectionable.
...but of course, I have no control over the sharpness level of every monitor out there...
_________________
I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| The first one is incredible for a 100% crop! |
+1 great captures from a great lens!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
