Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:24 am Post subject: A question about "off-axis" lens performance |
|
|
cheekygeek wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what "off-axis" lens performance means.
I'm guessing it means image quality degrades towards the corners?
If that is true, then wouldn't that also mean that a lens designed for 35mm film that suffered in the "off-axis" department would perform BETTER if used on a APS-C sensor size (or a 4/3 or micro 4/3)? Because essentially you are cropping out the part of the frame where the image degrades the most.
If I'm not understanding off-axis properly, then the above paragraph is probably all garbage.
Was thinking about it when I read that the Tamron 03A was superceded by the Tamron 103A with better off-axis performance. I was inventorying my lenses and found a Tamron 03A that I have never tried to use yet. I think I'll have to put it on my Pentax K-x and have a go. _________________ DSLR: Pentax K-3 II, D-BG5 grip, SLR: Pentax SP500, Pentax SP, Pentax SP II, Pentax Spotmatic F, MX, ME-Super, Super Program, pZ-1
Lenses:
Tele-Takumar: 300mm f6.3; 200mm f5.6; Takumar 200mm f3.5; Takumar 135mm f3.5; Macro-Takumar 50mm f4 (1:1)Super Takumars: 24mm f3.5, 55mm f2.0, 135mm f3.5; S-M-C Takumar 35mm f3.5, 50mm Macro f4.0 (1:2), 50mm f1.4, 135mm f2.5 (v2); Pentax SMC K 17mm f4 fisheye; Pentax-A: 50mm f1.4, 35-70mm f4; Pentacon: 50mm f1.8; Spiratone 85mm f1.8 (y/s); Vivitar: 85mm f1.8 preset; Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon Electric 35mm f2,4 |