Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
The original ist somewhat sharper, has much better clarity and fine details, it is much better in corners, it has better colors, better bokeh, less distortion, less curved field of sharpness.... sorry to say everything looks worse than from the Tevidon 50 _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |