View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: Mystery Lens: massive Double Gauss |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
Hi all,
Any idea what this is/where this lens might be from?
It's a double-Gauss lens with eight elements in six groups
http://www.flickr.com/photos/heritagefutures/5017011205/
details on measurements and lens cross-section accessible from the above image.
It's an aerial lens, I am sure but from which camera does it stem??
Also, does anyone out there own
Rudolf Kingslake, A history of the photographic lens, Academic Press 1989
If so, could I ask for a digital photo (readable) or scan of page 151 please. Google books lacks that page which may be significant in me being able to identify this double Gauss eight-element lens that I am struggllng with.
Thanks!
PS
I posted the ID query already on flickr and APUG, alas to no avail so far. Hoping amongst this crowd ore those who know. _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net
Last edited by heritagefutures on Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:28 am; edited 10 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5028 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:15 am Post subject: Re: Mystery Lens: massive Double Gauss |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Something wrong with your link, post it again. _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
fixed
(finally) _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
That doubtlessly is something aerial, and modernish - positively jet age (given the pressure compensation vents). Aerial photography or military aviation history forums are more likely to be able to identify it - the more so as it will probably have been classified until ten or twenty years ago...
As it will have come from some high-speed or high altitude recon plane flown in Australia, it might be worth while to investigate into what cameras the RAAF flew in their F-111's and Phantoms. _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
Sevo
very intriguing.. no, I got it from the US. I always thought the vents were for cooling or heating. Never thought of pressure compensation.., but with high altitude that might make sense...
Dirk _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
Heating/anti fog vents are usually behind a front cover glass or the front element - these vents throughout the barrel usually were put there to prevent warping due to pressure differences.
But if it is from the US, it can be anything - nobody else produced as much recon gear in cold war times... _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
Indeed. I recall having seen some lenses with heating wires stretched across them....
so now then on to which cameras that could have come from. The only identification is the number in the cast middle section... _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
Hi Dirk
I have the Kingslake book. Unfortunately, the Wild Aviogon is not your lens.
I've had a quick flick through the book and can't find a match. The Leitz Summar looks similar if you add an meniscus lens at each end.
Mark
(Unfortunately, I can't see how to add pictures to the reply) _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Hi Mark
Post them now as the first post you make can not contain images or links as it is an anti spam feature. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
SXR_Mark wrote: |
Hi Dirk
I have the Kingslake book. Unfortunately, the Wild Aviogon is not your lens.
I've had a quick flick through the book and can't find a match. The Leitz Summar looks similar if you add an meniscus lens at each end.
Mark
(Unfortunately, I can't see how to add pictures to the reply) |
Hi Mark
Thanks for looking...
Would be great of you could add the pics, or send me a pic/scan of Page 151 via e-mail..
D _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
This is the Wild Aviogon (from P150 of Kingslake). As you can see, not at all like the mystery lens. It is a Biogon type.
To quote Kingslake:
"One of the most important new types of lens to be developed since WWII is a kind of double-ended reversed-telephoto objective, consisting of a compact central positive structure with one or more large negative menisci at each end, making a roughly symmetrical arrangement. The back focal distance is so short that the lens cannot be used on an SLR, but it has been used on a rangefinder camera and on many aerial cameras where freedom from distortion is mandatory. "
This is the Leitz Summar f/2 of 1933 (Kingslake p125), a double Gauss of 6 elements in 4 groups. Add menisci at each end and it looks very like the mystery lens.
_________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
Indeed. Much appreciated!
So it's a Summar (or a Xenar) derivative...that throws the timeline back and thus the door wide open again... _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagefutures
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heritagefutures wrote:
There has been some literature on the fact that surveillance camera lenses experience delays in responding to thermal shock (i.e. when quickly taken to altitude with concomitant rapid drop in ambient air temperature), and that by the time the lenses have adjusted the recon mission is commonly over. Thus the lenses are then often out of calibration and hence under-perform.
I now wonder, whether these vents were included for high altitude surveillance lenses not just to allow the pressure to equalise, but also to allow a pre-cooling of the lens cells before the mission commenced. Note that the vents are between the thinner of the elements... _________________ dirk hr spennemann photography
PO Box 3440 • Albury NSW 2640 • Australia
www.ausphoto.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|