View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:10 am Post subject: the late great Canon nFD 20mm f/2.8 |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
When Canon switched mounts a whole line of lenses drifted off to history. They are not romantic, especially the last in the line. Yet these are superb lenses, like the nFD 24/2, perhaps the greatest MF 24 ever made, and this seldom discussed beauty: the Canon nFD 20mm f/2.8
Like most nFDs it's lighter than it looks,
here it is today, wide open:
bigger
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5586925019_a6ccb89803_b.jpg
original
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5586925019_ef4a2c8fa0_o.jpg
this sweet little girl was born with the rare apert syndrome. She is doing really well, speaks fine and runs around playing like any other child. Loved having her picture taken. Her normal twin sister is half out of the frame. To my eye the nFD does her some real justice here.
just a touch of NR, otherwise as shot. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L*
Last edited by uhoh7 on Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6624 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Great looking lens, I have one in the post too! The girl looks very interested in the lens, as I am _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Great looking lens, I have one in the post too! The girl looks very interested in the lens, as I am |
I hope you post up some shots when you get it
bigger
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5587516310_c3f6184bbe_b.jpg
bigger
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5067/5586917621_6ff6cc6994_b.jpg _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: the late great Canon nFD 20mm f/2.8 |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
uhoh7 wrote: |
When Canon switched mounts a whole line of lenses drifted off to history. They are not romantic, especially the last in the line. Yet these are superb lenses, like the nFD 24/2, perhaps the greatest MF 24 ever made, and this seldom discussed beauty: the Canon nFD 20mm f/2.8
Like most nFDs it's lighter than it looks,
here it is today, wide open:
bigger
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5586925019_a6ccb89803_b.jpg
original
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5586925019_ef4a2c8fa0_o.jpg
this sweet little girl was born with the rare apert syndrome. She is doing really well, speaks fine and runs around playing like any other child. Loved having her picture taken. Her normal twin sister is half out of the frame. To my eye the nFD does her some real justice here.
just a touch of NR, otherwise as shot. |
Cuties, both Almost tempted to look into getting an NEX-5 because of these lenses.
Almost |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3216 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
You just buy the lens and change the mount. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
Himself wrote: |
You just buy the lens and change the mount. |
You do this often with FD? How much time involved?
Nex bodies are showing up for 250 now, and they take everything from c-mount, ltm, to nikon, or hassie for that matter. No surgery (aka butchery)involved. 20 bucks per mount for an adapter. Rez as good as any aps-c, better than most.
Easy to carry also.
Great second camera, or my case now, only camera.
_________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I suspect that Canon's thrust regarding lens construction changed somewhat with the advent of the EF mount. By the mid-90s they still weren't offering a fast 24 or 35 L lens, although they were making a 20-35 f/2.8L. It seems to me that Canon had become more interested in developing very good zoom lenses to cover most focal lengths, but that they did still concentrate their energies on certain high-profile primes, like the 85/1.2L and the fast telephotos. That's where the glamor was -- and is.
Of course, Canon was already building some nice L-series zooms during the FD days. So when they started ramping up their EF selections, I suspect their market research indicated that this was where they should spend their R&D money, and that's what they did. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
I suspect that Canon's thrust regarding lens construction changed somewhat with the advent of the EF mount. By the mid-90s they still weren't offering a fast 24 or 35 L lens, although they were making a 20-35 f/2.8L. It seems to me that Canon had become more interested in developing very good zoom lenses to cover most focal lengths, but that they did still concentrate their energies on certain high-profile primes, like the 85/1.2L and the fast telephotos. That's where the glamor was -- and is.
Of course, Canon was already building some nice L-series zooms during the FD days. So when they started ramping up their EF selections, I suspect their market research indicated that this was where they should spend their R&D money, and that's what they did. |
zooms and auto focus--the very thought of it makes me cringe.
of course the original sin was leaving rangefinders.
my modernistic blindspot is shooting digital instead of film. If you suck like me, you have to shoot a bunch and check your results ASAP. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
uhoh7 wrote: |
Himself wrote: |
You just buy the lens and change the mount. |
You do this often with FD? How much time involved?
|
I make some FD mount conversions. Sometimes I need a very high amount of time. I suppose some 30 hours of work. But This is partly because I try to make no lens butchery, but a full reversible conversion - no FD parts are harmed - if interested, visit my homepage.
I have a nFD 20mm f/2.8 too.
I start to convert it, but have stoped after recognized that it would not work on a unshaved EOS 5D on infinity.
So I use it at the moment as a near field wideangle lens:
_MG_2073-0.5 von Time-4-Photos auf Flickr
Probably I have to shave my mirror for different lenses - and then I could use the FD 20 on my EOS 5D _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3216 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
I don't do that but Stan - Trifox - is doing it. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
ZoneV wrote: |
I make some FD mount conversions. Sometimes I need a very high amount of time. I suppose some 30 hours of work. But This is partly because I try to make no lens butchery, but a full reversible conversion - no FD parts are harmed - if interested, visit my homepage.
I have a nFD 20mm f/2.8 too.
I start to convert it, but have stoped after recognized that it would not work on a unshaved EOS 5D on infinity.
Probably I have to shave my mirror for different lenses - and then I could use the FD 20 on my EOS 5D |
Thanks for great post. I admire your dedication.
It's testimony to the quality of some of these late nFD lenses that their prices remain stable in spite of the more limited applications when compared with Nikon AIS lenses.
The 20 goes for 150-220, and 24/2 for around 300.
The coatings on both of these are extremely good. Another lens worthy of note, but not cheap is the nFD 50 1.2 L, which might be the sharpest superspeed MF 50.
The more run of the mill nFDs are alot cheaper, and good performers too--some of them anyway.
The are sometimes bashed for their more "plasticy" feel, but in fact the builds are good, and they are 20% lighter in general than the FDs.
This is a real consideration if the nex is your platform, because anything over about 380 grams and you switch to a "lens holding" technique.
Both the 20 and especially the diminutive 24/2 handle great with the sony.
20 dealing with some backlight:
bigger
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5057/5586919829_12e9653cb9_b.jpg _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|