View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I think the samples above look very flat. The bokeh is nice but it's quite low contrast and colours look a bit washed out. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I think the samples above look very flat. The bokeh is nice but it's quite low contrast and colours look a bit washed out. |
I don't think they look flat; I actually perceive some depth in them. I agree that the colour saturation and contrast are not very high. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aliasant
Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Posts: 39 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:41 pm Post subject: Thanx to this and a couple of other threads I had to get one |
|
|
aliasant wrote:
Heres my Berolina Westromat 35mm f2.8 copy I got today.
I love it!
This is at f4 i think. I cant be wide open but Im not 100% sure.
No PP except a little exposure boost.
This is wide open by hand at ISO 400 and the closest posible range, about 15 cm.
No PP at all.
The lens is one of my ugliest lenses ever but wow. This is a nice lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Volunteer
Joined: 16 Mar 2011 Posts: 74 Location: Zagreb, Croatia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Volunteer wrote:
I ran into both 35mm versions on a flea market today, but had no idea if they were any good. Now that I read prices on ebay, I'd kill myself. The seller wanted 17-18€ for 35/2.8. On the contrary, they were in a bad shape and I'm not sure if they could be cleaned. _________________ This lens is good for portraits = This lens is as soft as Oprah's butt. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
The Westron 3.5 was the "bargain" version. Not really good. I'd honestly pass on it for any price. The 2.8 version is a different formula, which usually has the Westromat name on it, is considerably better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ngaiki
Joined: 02 May 2013 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
ngaiki wrote:
i bought one (ISCO-GOTTINGEN WESTRON 35mm 3.5) and just received it. Mine is the zebra version. I still haven't tested it.. but it looks really nice. Any example from this particular lens (3.5) ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|