View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
zenit55
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 18 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:37 am Post subject: Old Helios 44 - problem? can it be saved? |
|
|
zenit55 wrote:
I am a general newbie in the field of photography and general, and particularly when it comes to old manual focus lenses on digital cameras.
An older Helios 44 came into my possession. The lens is in a bit of a rough shape - the focus ring requires some effort to move, the front element is covered in circular cleaning scratches and somewhere on the inside visible from the back of the lens there are some weird tiny dots which do not look like fungus or dust.
Here are some samples taken with the lens - it seems be very susceptible to diffusion around highlights and doesn't appear to be very sharp. Which brings me to a question: Is this due to dot-like gunk inside of the lens or cleaning marks on the front of the element? Can this lens be saved?
I am including some pictures to show some of the dotted marks and sample snapshots taken with this lens.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
zenit55
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 18 Location: USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
You have to have two posts before you can post pictures.
My latest Schacht Travgon has similar dots all over the front element. Not really sure if they can be gotten rid off. Lens cleaner, lighter fluid, and alcohol did not make them go away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
The forum blocks pictures and links for a members first post as an anti-spam measure.
I did a quick how-to on the 44 here http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1047535/0
It should help with the task, the design is pretty strait forward.
The elements do look like they need a good cleaning, just be sure to not reverse any elements when putting it back together, the rear element in particular.
_________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/
Last edited by Lightshow on Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elliott
Joined: 16 May 2011 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
elliott wrote:
The good thing is that front element imperfections have the least impact on your images. The image quality issues you are experience could have more to do with the nature of the lens itself than the little dots on the front element.
Here is an extreme example:
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/10/front-element-scratches |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
You have to have two posts before you can post pictures.
My latest Schacht Travgon has similar dots all over the front element. Not really sure if they can be gotten rid off. Lens cleaner, lighter fluid, and alcohol did not make them go away. |
You could try paint thinner, acetone... just use caution, the coating could be removed, and and be extra cautious with cemented elements. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zenit55
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 18 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
zenit55 wrote:
elliott wrote: |
The good thing is that front element imperfections have the least impact on your images. The image quality issues you are experience could have more to do with the nature of the lens itself than the little dots on the front element.
Here is an extreme example:
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/10/front-element-scratches |
just to clarify... the dots are on the rear element, the cleaning scratches are on the front. I always thought the imperfections on the rear element are more important to image quality.
Are older lenses like mine more prone to halos around highlights? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
I wouldn't like that many front element Putzspuren. Only if you want artistic glow. I think rear element is OK. Suggestion: get another Helios for few bucks. Combine parts to make one "perfect". _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I assume it doesn't have the red P(Pi)
How many blades is the aperture?
8 is normal, 13 is the one to get for parts. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
My latest Schacht Travgon has similar dots all over the front element. Not really sure if they can be gotten rid off. Lens cleaner, lighter fluid, and alcohol did not make them go away. |
Funny that these 'dots' have been mentioned.
I have a Pentax 50/1.7 with these dots behind the front element and last week I bought an ultrasonic cleaner. I thought this would be a good opportunity to try the cleaner so I put the element with 'dots' into it. I was very pleased to find the element came out gleaming and completely free of 'dots'. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zenit55
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 18 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zenit55 wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I assume it doesn't have the red P(Pi)
How many blades is the aperture?
8 is normal, 13 is the one to get for parts. |
It's a 13 blade one. Those seem to be a bit more expensive on eBay at least.
I'm going to try to disassemble it and clean it up a bit. Still don't understand what causes these glowing highlights - scratches on the front or dots on the inside of the rear element. I kinda like the pictures the lens takes when there are no glowy artifacts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zenit55
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 18 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
zenit55 wrote:
Well after all this I ended up disassembling the lens today and cleaning it up a bit. The dots were concentrated on the outside of the middle element (the side facing towards the diaphragm). They were dissolved after soaking the lens in some acetone for a while.
The problem came when I went to reassemble the lens. The tiny screws are made of such brittle metal, that the slots on some of the screws broke when I tried to screw them back in (with no force at all). Does anybody know where these screws can be sourced from?
Optically the lens now works a bit better, with less halos around the highlights, but still sometimes lacks contrast and does not appear to be very sharp. The lens also results in very warm colors, which I very much like. Maybe I should get an example of one of these in better condition.
here is an example of a better picture after surgery.
IMG_1690 by zenit55, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|