Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

6x Shootout: Biotar Pancolar Oreston Primoplan Helios v6 v7
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pancolart wrote:
I guess we are talking here about demystification of the idea that differences are anywhere more then subtle.


Yes, this is true especially for 50mm lenses, because as we saw, most of them are basically the same lens, and the counstruction principle is so standard, and the glass requirements are so easy (no big magnification, and no wide perspective stretching, therefore no need for expensive high refraction glass or aspherical elements to correct aberrations), that we can really say most are de facto the same lens.

But if you test 20mm lenses or 300mm lenses, of course, things change, considerably.


PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

zXzXZX

Last edited by MoonPix on Thu Apr 27, 2023 2:22 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you would also see more noticeable differences comparing 50mm F1.4 lenses, a much more difficult design to execute.


PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2011 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In terms of design the Primoplan is the oddball here, as it is not a Double-Gauss type, but an advanced Triplet development.

For the longest time it has been much maligned, but when seen individually it is not half bad.


PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've found a nice condition Helios 77m-4, like the one reviewed, however with a slightly different label. It's in Russian ГЕЛИОС, and since it's my first manual on a digital body, I'm a bit afraid of mounting it to a 5d mk2.

I couldn't find 77m-4 mc Helios in any compatibility charts for 5d, so just to make sure - will it fit? It works very nice on a eos rebel 450D, but will it damage the mirror on 5d? By the looks of it, it seems it should work, and it mounts well, I just didn't click the shutter.



edit: for some reason it doesn't show the pic: forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201110/4776_helios_1.jpg


PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

andrej wrote:



edit: for some reason it doesn't show the pic: forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201110/4776_helios_1.jpg


Hi and welcome to the forum ... This is an anti-spam feature for users with one post only ...

I'm not sure about the 5D, but on the 5D MkII you have a 0.7mm clearance between the bottom of the lens and the mirror ...


PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks!

yes, I searched for some more articles on whether it will cause too much damage if not suitable and finally pressed the shutter Smile
it works all good on 5D mark II, focus to infinity and all.

I really like the 'swirly bokeh' it produces, and image quality is more than fine for the money spent.


PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MoonPix wrote:
I love these kinds of comparisons... they are indeed very similar to one another. Yes, I can see slight differences between them... but for the most part, they give the same impression. What is interesting is the price differences between them. Isn't the Biotar much more expensive than say the Helios?


The Helios 44 was the kit lens on the Zenit cameras and the Soviets made a LOT of them. There were probably a hundred Helios 44 manufactured for every Biotar.

Lucky for us it's such a well-made Biotar clone and so cheap!


PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks for the comparison.
the differences are only visible by seeing them side by side.
still, imo the pancolar renders nicer than the others.



regards


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Pancolar gives a good account of itself.


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for a very clear comparison. Subjectively, for colors and image rendition, I liked the most Pancolar and Oreston. Taking into account that Oreston is barely the cheapest among your test set! It makes me wonder, who set that Primoplan should be the highest in price? Was it an initial price tag, in the production period, or was it a "popular marketing" coming from forums and extremely well done pictures on flickr?


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rarity + collectors + hype somewhere, the recipe is the same for all lenses. I am sure more good pictures were taken with Oreston than with Primoplan.

Really, if one wants a technically good lens, take any Japanese top brand from the beginning of 80' (Nikon/Canon/Konica/Zuiko/Pentax/Minolta does not matter) and you have it. But those lenses are so ubiquitous that after awhile people stop being excited by them and start to search for "character". That's where lenses with flaws such as Primoplan deliver. I am sure 99% of Primoplan owners were overjoyed to upgrade it for Oreston and Trioplan for Orestor.


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 1:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Main thing this test shows is the differences between good 50mm double gauss type lenses are rather slight. The Biotar and Primoplan, being older and designed before electronic computers are a little less highly corrected so have a little swirl to the bokeh caused by spherical aberration and coma. That is only apparent wide open though and stopped down, they will all perform about the same with only very minor differences.


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fermy, you must be right!

Me personally, I appreciate Fujian CCTV that I use sometimes on NEX just because it delivers some difficulties to shoot. I think, digital photography almost exempted users from that minimal effort they had to do with manual cameras. So when you find a lens that delivers you some imperfection, that turns you back to the ultime sens of photography: you start overcoming that imperfection in search of reality.


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1, from what you say follows that a lens imperfection costs more. Funny! I saw Primoplan prices on ebay, it's higher than Takumar.


PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Alex, that is often the case. Some people seek out lenses with 'character' and those lenses are the ones with residual aberratons present. The reason why they are more expensive is supply and demand - there are so many later lenses with higher level of corrections but the older less corrected ones with character are simply not available in the same numbers. Primoplan is expensive, there aren't many of them around. A Helios 44 is a good substitute for the Primoplan imho.