visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10543
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
visualopsins wrote:
What, no replies? Okay, I will. Panorama is not so easy to do. Architectural photography is very very difficult. Both together? As Jewish peoples say, oy vey!  I think these are good efforts. I do not think I can do better, but I have seen much better photos taken by you, Attila. I will say what I would say to myself if these were my photos. In #1 there is too much sky showing for subject. The building looks not horizontal, tilted. In #2 the left structure looks larger than the right, maybe because taking position was not centered or maybe because wide lens was not rotated on optical center; with wide lens any small difference in angle gets magnified. Right side light pole blocks background building steeple. The stitching together is excellent with the color balance and exposure of each individual photo perfect; if you didn't say these are panorama I could never guess.
Your country has wonderful architecture and beautiful clouds! 
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
What, no replies? Okay, I will. Panorama is not so easy to do. Architectural photography is very very difficult. Both together? As Jewish peoples say, oy vey! I think these are good efforts. I do not think I can do better, but I have seen much better photos taken by you, Attila. I will say what I would say to myself if these were my photos. In #1 there is too much sky showing for subject. The building looks not horizontal, tilted. In #2 the left structure looks larger than the right, maybe because taking position was not centered or maybe because wide lens was not rotated on optical center; with wide lens any small difference in angle gets magnified. Right side light pole blocks background building steeple. The stitching together is excellent with the color balance and exposure of each individual photo perfect; if you didn't say these are panorama I could never guess.
Your country has wonderful architecture and beautiful clouds! |
Thank you ! I am crazy about clouds as you can see 
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
