View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 12:56 am Post subject: Bellows versus Helicoid |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I'm wondering how effective a bellows might be as a method of adapting projector lenses instead of using helicoids to focus. Anyone? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I believe bellow are more convenient for long focal projector lens as it has long range of focus.
At opposite, helicoide are better for projector lenses like 75mm since you don't need a lot of range in focus in order to go from infinity to close focus. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with Pierre. This reminds me of the very long R telephotos that Canon produced in the 1960s. The longest was 1200mm. It didn't have a focusing helical, rather it had a bellows at the rear. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Bellows normally are too thick for infinity with lenses under 100mm, and many are too thick even for that.
Bellows are much cheaper than helicals though.
You can find rather short bellows. Look for the folding Kopil brand.
There are many available in M42 particularly.
These may require some lubrication/loosening up.
A cheap vintage helical thats a bit scarce is the Spiratone/Accura variable extension ring, made in the 1960s-70s. It takes some clever searching on ebay. They are good for 75-90mm depending on your ability to mount lenses deep in the device. I use one for a 75mm Petzval. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dickb
Joined: 04 Apr 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dickb wrote:
In addition to the previous considerations, be aware that bellows can be a little more cumbersome to use. Depending on the sturdiness of the bellows and the weight of the lens you may or may not need to lock the movement of the bellows every time you adjust its length. YMMV. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Thanks to all for the advice. My initial thought was to save having to purchase separate extensions for each lens by applying a simple and cheap adapter (M42 or whatever) to the rear of each lens, then using the bellows for the needed extension and focusing. I suppose depending on which bellows, that I can get caught with too long a minimum extension. Perhaps I can accomplish the same thing by using a helicoid of sufficient range for multiple type lenses. Right now the two lenses I most want to use are the Diaplan 2.8/100 and a Trioplan 3.5/75 from a folding camera. I'm expecting good things from both, although the 75mm most likely will not have the same quality bubble bokeh as the Diaplan. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
You can use a combo of bellow/helicoid/tubes. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Bellows normally are too thick for infinity with lenses under 100mm, and many are too thick even for that.
Bellows are much cheaper than helicals though.
You can find rather short bellows. Look for the folding Kopil brand.
There are many available in M42 particularly.
These may require some lubrication/loosening up.
A cheap vintage helical thats a bit scarce is the Spiratone/Accura variable extension ring, made in the 1960s-70s. It takes some clever searching on ebay. They are good for 75-90mm depending on your ability to mount lenses deep in the device. I use one for a 75mm Petzval. |
There are now plentiful supplies of new helicoids on e-bay which are generally cheaper than any of the used sets of bellows I've brought. I've seen them in a variety of lengths, with M42, M52 & even M65 threads and more recently adapter mounts have been appearing too. Few helicoids extend by more than their original length so shorter ones don't have a great amount of movement. If the lens can be mounted deep in the helicoid the longer M65 type might be quite useful.
Have a look at http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xhelicoid.TRS0&_nkw=helicoid&_sacat=625
My most used helicoid has MFT at one end & EOS at the other starting at the right length for infinity focus with the EOS & extending another 12mm or so. I use it with OM, PK, M42 & reversing adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|