Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Primagon or Flektogon?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:07 pm    Post subject: Primagon or Flektogon? Reply with quote

Hello,

I want to add a 35mm lens for a Praktina. There are not much to choose - the two most common and the two in question are the Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35 or the Meyer Primagon 4.5/35. They pop up every now and then on ebay and tend to be in the same price range.

Which one would be the best choice regarding picture quality. I know those lenses exist in different mounts and if there is someone who will share his/her experience I would appreciate this.

Speed isn't an issue. If I want to shoot low light I won't thake the Praktina.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you aware there is also a f/2.4 Flek?


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flek 2,4/35mm doesn't exist in Praktina mount ... Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Are you aware there is also a f/2.4 Flek?


As far as I know there are only two 35mm lenses from East Germany.

I have seen one Schacht Ulm lens as well but I wouldn't consider this.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the flektogon should be better (and it's faster too)


PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meyer Primagon is an excellent lens too and lot cheaper usual.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no experience with these lenses on FF, but Primagon has sharper center and lower CA at (APS-C) borders.