View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:02 pm Post subject: My old Nikkor lenses |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
Hi to everybody,
right now I'm shooting with a Canon 7D and some EOS lenses, but a friend of mine gave me a couple of old nikkor lenses that belonged to his father.
The lenses are
Nikkor Ai-s 105 f2
Nikkor Ai-s 35 f2
What's the quality of these lenses? Is it worth the price of buying an adaptor EOS/Nikkor to use them?
Is it a sacrilege to mount a nikkor lens on a Canon body?
Last edited by poetofprague on Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
the 105 AI s should be either f1.8 or f2.5, if it is a f2.0 it should be an AF 105 D DC (with defocus control...very expensive)
your lenses are absolutely worth to buy an adaptor. 105 is one of the best in its class, i think the 35´s reputation is influenced by f 2.0 35 AF, which often is reported to have oily blades, but this is not the case for the manual lens. _________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
der einrahmer wrote: |
the 105 AI s should be either f1.8 or f2.5, if it is a f2.0 it should be an AF 105 D DC (with defocus control...very expensive)
your lenses are absolutely worth to buy an adaptor. 105 is one of the best in its class, i think the 35´s reputation is influenced by f 2.0 35 AF, which often is reported to have oily blades, but this is not the case for the manual lens. |
Sorry, the 105 its an AI-S 2.5.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Two very well regarded lenses you've been given - 100% get the adapter(s) for them and enjoy using them on the 7D.
Oh, welcome aboard too - the madness starts here _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
And if you don't like them, you can always give them to me as we seem to live in the same city.
Welcome and enjoy two very nice lenses!
ps - se vuoi un adattatore senza conferma di messa a fuoco in prestito fammi un fischio che dovrei averne due |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
ludoo wrote: |
And if you don't like them, you can always give them to me as we seem to live in the same city.
Welcome and enjoy two very nice lenses!
ps - se vuoi un adattatore senza conferma di messa a fuoco in prestito fammi un fischio che dovrei averne due |
Ops! I just ordered one with AF confirm.. I paid for it 40 euro..
But they told me that without AF confirm it's really hard with a 105mm...
Scusa se scrivo in inglese ma magari gli altri non capiscono |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Hi,
I have only used an "old" Nikkor-O 35/2, and i decided not to sell it (i'm actually waiting for a Nikon to EOS adapter ) ...
Quote: |
Is it a sacrilege to mount a nikkor lens on a Canon body? |
To end with a Cankor setup ? Well, when i look at the results i have got from some Nikkors on my Pentax K10D, i would say that you can take the risk ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
[quote="poetofprague"]
ludoo wrote: |
Ops! I just ordered one with AF confirm.. I paid for it 40 euro..
But they told me that without AF confirm it's really hard with a 105mm... |
AF confirm is a good choice if you don't have a focusing screen for manual focusing. I think you'll have a nice surprise when the adapter arrives and you'll be able to test those lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
ludoo wrote: |
AF confirm is a good choice if you don't have a focusing screen for manual focusing. I think you'll have a nice surprise when the adapter arrives and you'll be able to test those lenses! |
Canon 7D has the live view screen, but I don't like to shoot this way. I didnt understand very well how this Af confirm works, I hopr they're not too complicated.. I tried these lenses on the old Nikon FM camera and it seemed quite easy to focus, is it really so different on a modern camera? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
poetofprague wrote: |
Canon 7D has the live view screen, but I don't like to shoot this way. I didnt understand very well how this Af confirm works, I hopr they're not too complicated.. I tried these lenses on the old Nikon FM camera and it seemed quite easy to focus, is it really so different on a modern camera? |
The adapters are easy to use, they just have a chip on them that allows the camera to use metering and AF confirm.
As for focusing screens, modern ones are optimized for brightness, not manual focusing. They are mostly useless below f 3.5 or 2.8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kopimorning
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 97 Location: Jakarta-Bali
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
kopimorning wrote:
poetofprague wrote: |
Sorry, the 105 its an AI-S 2.5.. |
oowh the 105/2.5 ais has it's own legend. try googling _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/41597826@N04 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
I have both and they are both terrific lenses. You will be very glad indeed to have bought the adapter (and don't worry about the focus chip, it will actually help).
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
I got the adapter, I took some pics just to try it.. God, it's difficult to focus manually... The only problem is that I don't have idea how to take the lens away from the adapter.. Can anyone help me? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:57 pm Post subject: Re: My olk Nikkor lenses |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Certainly worth buying the adapter, the 105/2.5 Ai-S lens is of quality enough to deliver pro quality on the most demanding and large DSLR sensors. Your 35/2 Ai-S is also a great lens, perhaps not as legendary as the 105/2.5 but nevertheless good for demanding work as long as you don't use it wide open.
poetofprague wrote: |
Is it a sacrilege to mount a nikkor lens on a Canon body? |
No. Strange question btw, since I thought this forum consisted of lots of Canon/Nikon/Pentax etc. shooters who mount or adapt 3rd party lenses to their DSLRs. Excellent lenses will outlive the body they're attached to - just think of how many SLR/DSLRs have gone by since those two were introduced... _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
...as I experienced that 7D have such nice big and bright viewfinder that I haven't any problem with manual glass even though didn't testes such fast glasses like you have. Enjoy those Nikkors. I am sure that you won't be dissapointed. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
poetofprague wrote: |
The only problem is that I don't have idea how to take the lens away from the adapter.. Can anyone help me? |
Everything Nikkor spins opposite, the focus ring and the adapter. Try that? _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
poetofprague wrote: |
The only problem is that I don't have idea how to take the lens away from the adapter.. Can anyone help me? |
Everything Nikkor spins opposite, the focus ring and the adapter. Try that? |
Yes I made it.. Last night I tried them, but the light wasn't good enough, so I will test them tomorrow.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Congrats. If you're only going to have one Nikon lens, the 105/2.5 is a great one. The 35/2 is very good, too, and I've gotten some excellent images with mine. But there's a caveat--watch lighting conditions because it can flare and ghost. Actually, mine is an Ai, and yours is newer. Maybe they changed the optical formula/lens coating. Still, if the 35/2 has weakness, that's it.
I wish I could use Canon lenses on my Nikon, but they won't focus to infinity without an optical correction adapter, which screws up the image. So, what would be the point?
Let us know how it goes, and, more importantly, have fun! _________________ The longer I use autofocus lenses,
The greater my preference for manual focus grows. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
In my garden there aren't many flowers, sorry that's all I had to show.
Nikon Ai-s 105
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
Nikkor Ai-s 105
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
It doesnt seem very sharp or it's my impression??
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
I agree, results don't look sharp from a lens that should deliver much better. Exposure data, EXIF? It doesn't at all look like what I'm used to from the 105/2.5, and I have access to three copies. _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
Esox lucius wrote: |
I agree, results don't look sharp from a lens that should deliver much better. Exposure data, EXIF? It doesn't at all look like what I'm used to from the 105/2.5, and I have access to three copies. |
These have been all taken at F2.5.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Shutter speed is my main interest. You're on a 1.6x crop sensor and though lens is small it's safe to assume 1/160s or 1/200 doesn't guarantee camera shake is not involved.
Flowers can move from wind, the bicycle and pint not likely I would give it some tripod use and rule out any camera shake to be sure, though it is always possible your lens needs service. Dirt/haze inside, fungus, scratches, camera shake, moving subjects, wind, hand-held ie movement from focus to exposure moment, too small depth of field, mirror slap, too slow shutter...
So many things that can go wrong with close-ups, impossible to tell what is the factor diminishing detail here when circumstances, shooting technique used and exposure is unknown. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poetofprague
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Posts: 16 Location: Milan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poetofprague wrote:
Esox lucius wrote: |
Shutter speed is my main interest. You're on a 1.6x crop sensor and though lens is small it's safe to assume 1/160s or 1/200 doesn't guarantee camera shake is not involved.
Flowers can move from wind, the bicycle and pint not likely I would give it some tripod use and rule out any camera shake to be sure, though it is always possible your lens needs service. Dirt/haze inside, fungus, scratches, camera shake, moving subjects, wind, hand-held ie movement from focus to exposure moment, too small depth of field, mirror slap, too slow shutter...
So many things that can go wrong with close-ups, impossible to tell what is the factor diminishing detail here when circumstances, shooting technique used and exposure is unknown. |
Pic 1 1/500
pic 2 1/200
pic3 1/100 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|