View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:11 am Post subject: SMC Tak 50mm/1.4 Goes to the Boneyard! |
|
|
Kram wrote:
A few were shot with extension tubes. My copy is a bit yellowed and I didn't always correct for that. I'm loving this lens but still not sure if it's my favorite in the 50mm range. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
#3,4,5 and the fairy princess....I don't think the yellow matters does it? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Nice flower pics. I'm not sure about the last ones. I find them a bit creepy. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
Tak SMC 50/1.4; SHARP indeed. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7447 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:05 am Post subject: Re: SMC Tak 50mm/1.4 Goes to the Boneyard! |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Kram wrote: |
I'm loving this lens but still not sure if it's my favorite in the 50mm range. |
What others are you comparing it with? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keltzar
Joined: 22 Apr 2010 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keltzar wrote:
There is an easy cure for the yellow. Put it rear-element up against a strong UV light source but somewhere in the house away from the weather for a few weeks. The UV light will cure the yellow back to clear.
For myself, I bought a UV lamp and faced rear element first to the UV lamp several yellowed lenses: super-tak 50/1.4, SMC Tak 50/1.4, Nikkor 35/1.4 ... for a few weeks, and voila - all cured of the yellow plague.
Somewhere on my old PC I have a folder of test images I shot on my EOS 5D of a bunch of 50mm lenses at f2.0. From memory, they were:
1) Zeiss Contax planar 50/1.4
2) Leica Summicron 50/2
3) Pentacon 50/1.8
4) canon EOS 50/1.8 mk1
5) Schneider Xenon 50/1.8
6) Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8
7) Nikon pre-AI 50/1.4
Nikon MC 50/1.4 AIS
9) SMC Takumar 50/1.4
10) Super Takumar 50/1.4
11) Olympus OM 55/1.2
What I recall ... is that the nikons had the worst bokeh and the most unreal colours. The rest were pretty closely matched. The SMC Takumar and SuperTak were very natural ... but my favourite was... the canon EOS EF 50/1.8 mk.1
The schneider too was pretty nice. none of the rest made much of an impression. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
I like all of them.
I set mine on a window sill for I think three weeks and all the yellow is gone. I put a pen under one side to get pointed more into the sun, then turned it every few days. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
I love creepy doll photos. _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keltzar
Joined: 22 Apr 2010 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keltzar wrote:
I just recall I missed two more from that batch test:
12) carl Zeiss Ultron 50/1.8 with the concave element
13) rollei MFT planar 50/1.8 (the original german made version) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
I agree with Martin that the last couple have a sense about them, but I find their thought provoking nature makes them compelling. The moss and age on an ageless doll is an interesting parallel. And hey, some nice bokeh there to boot.
I have a Tak and feel the same as yourself. I used it more before I had converted more options to use on my A900, but when it was one of the few I had, I had no complaints.
K. _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frogfish
Joined: 06 Apr 2010 Posts: 57 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frogfish wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
Nice flower pics. I'm not sure about the last ones. I find them a bit creepy. |
I LOVED that last one of the doll ....... there is a story in that picture. Great shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
Nice shots, #2 is the best one for me, especially for its colors. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
Thanks all.
Frogfish, Pirate, she was just laying there with moss growing on her. Strangely beautiful. Yes, and scary too.
peterqd, my other MF 50mm-ish lenses: SMC Takumar 55mm/2.0, Helios 44-2, Pancolar zebra 50mm/1.8, Nikkor Micro 55mm/2.8, Nikkor H-C 50mm/2.0.
None of them cost me over $40. I'm a bottom feeder, a user and not a collector. The only Zeiss glass that I own is the 80mm/2,8 Planar on my Rolleiflex SL-66. Love the lens, but I wish it had more than five aperture blades!
I have the Canon AF EF 50mm 1.4 too. Maybe it's the best one? Cost more than $40 though.
The lens is basking in the window right now, as is the yellowed fungi-ed Pancolar. Don't worry they are in separate rooms. Pancolar has been there almost two weeks with no change in color.
Maybe I forgot to say that these were shot on a Canon 30D. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Kram wrote: |
...... Pancolar has been there almost two weeks with no change in color..... |
If your pancolar is the zebra or the red MC versions, it's possible than don't reduce the yellow cast, because sometimes they are a bit yellowish.
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
estudleon wrote: |
Kram wrote: |
...... Pancolar has been there almost two weeks with no change in color..... |
If your pancolar is the zebra or the red MC versions, it's possible than don't reduce the yellow cast, because sometimes they are a bit yellowish. |
Thanks for that Rino. Yes, it is a zebra. I can live with it. I love that lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
ludoo wrote: |
Nice shots, #2 is the best one for me, especially for its colors. |
Thanks ludoo. That was the first frame of the day. I should have just quit and gone home. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Kram wrote: |
estudleon wrote: |
Kram wrote: |
...... Pancolar has been there almost two weeks with no change in color..... |
If your pancolar is the zebra or the red MC versions, it's possible than don't reduce the yellow cast, because sometimes they are a bit yellowish. |
Thanks for that Rino. Yes, it is a zebra. I can live with it. I love that lens! |
Of course. It´s a very good one. Enjoy !!!!!
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FernandoB12
Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Posts: 231 Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FernandoB12 wrote:
Hi Mark,
You know, it is my favorite glass. Very nice shoots. I will try with a extension tube. _________________ Camera: Nikon D80 Canon 20D Pentax Spotmatic
Manual Lens: Nikkor 24mm f/2.8; Nikkor Ai 50mm f/1.4; Nikkor 50mm f/2.0; Nikkor Micro AI 55mm f/3.5; Nikkor H 85mm f/1.8; Nikkor P.C 105mm f/2.5; Nikkor Q 135mm f/2.8; Nikkor P 180mm f/2.8; Nikon Series E 75~150mm f/3.5;
SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4; SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8; Super Takumar 85mm f/1.9; Takumar S-M-C 120mm f/2.8; Takumar S-M-C 200mm f/4; Tele Takumar 300mm f/6.3
Vivitar Series 1 Macro 105mm 2.5
Helios M44-4 58mm f/2; Soligor 350mm f/5.6; Soligor 135mm f/2.8;
AF Lens: AF-S Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED; AF Nikkor 70-210mm f/4-5.6; |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|