| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
EricR
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 28
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: Twin like images of one cat |
 |
|
EricR wrote:
#1 shot with a Pentax K20D and a Pentax 50mm a f1.7
#2
Shot with a Pentax K-x and a Tamron Adaptall 70-210 f3.5
The cat moved in between but striked the same pose minutes after I made the first shot. Just a coincidence, I noticed the resemblance between the two shots when I got the images of my memory cards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 2772
Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Perhaps this is his/hers favorite post? By the way nice twin shots.
_________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tharos
Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 322
Location: Istanbul/TURKEY
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tharos wrote:
First one is sharper  that's why I like it more.
_________________
Camera : Yashica Electro 35 GS, Canon 450D, Konica C35 AF
28mm : Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar F3.5, Yashica ML F2.8
35mm : Distagon F2.8 (soon)
50mm : Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar F2,8 // aus Jena Pancolar F1.8 // SMC Tak F1.4 // Planar F1.7
55mm : Auto-Rikenon F1.8
58mm : Helios 44-3 F2
85mm : Jupiter 9 F2
135mm : Pentacon auto 6-blade F2.8 // Super Tak F3.5 // CZJ Sonnar F3.5 Zebra |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6943
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Lol, fantastic! He did it so you could compare the 2 lenses! 
The 1st image is sharper but the 2nd has better colour for me.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EricR
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 28
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EricR wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
Lol, fantastic! He did it so you could compare the 2 lenses!
The 1st image is sharper but the 2nd has better colour for me. |
I noticed the Tamrron Adaptall has warmer colour in other pictures too, it's a nice lens and is a match for primes at shorter focal lenghts. 70-105 (or maybe 135) is razorsharp. This shot was at F4, like most telezooms best sharpness is at F8 or F11.
The Pentax A 50mm does a nice job also at F2.
Both shots at ISO 1600, props for the Pentax K-x to deliver this detail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cmontoya
Joined: 07 Dec 2009
Posts: 216
Location: Cebu City, Philippines
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
cmontoya wrote:
I don't have 20-20 vision anymore (old age sniff) but I can tell the first photo's sharper. These old lenses could sure give current generation lenses a run for their money.
_________________
Digital: Canon 450D
AF: Tamron 28-75 2.8
Film: Canonet 28, Canonet QL-17, Nikon FM2
MF: Nikkor 50mm 1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
