What happened here?

[martinsmith99]

Most of the roll looks as though the outer edges are overexposed.



Neopan with Rodinal 1:50. 30 secs initial stirring, 10 secs stirring every minute
_________________
Martin - Moderator

MF Lenses User Real Names (add yours)
MF Lenses User Self Pics (add yours)
Gear: Canon EOS 5Dmkii, EOS 50 & 620, T90, AE-1 SLRs, FED2, Zorki6 & Canonette QL17 Giii RFs and stacks of lenses
ms-imaging
My Blog
My Flickr
Old Lens Fanatics Facebook Group

[CarbonR]

I would say a light weak in the camera
_________________
Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies (K, AP, ElectroSpotmatic, SPIIa...), pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
I am searching for : Ultra Achromatic Takumar 85/4.5, Takumar 100/2, Biotar 75/1.5 (cheap, but I don't care much about condition)
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm

[hexi]

Light leak ^

what camera did you used mr ?
_________________
Happy owner and user of :

SLR's > Contax Aria - Contax 139 - Contax RX
DSLR > Canon EOS 1Ds

Lenses : Planar 1.4/50 & 1.7/50 C/Y
M42 ( return ! ) : Helios 44-2 / Pentacon 1.8/50

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85

[Carlsson]

Maybe not a light leak, I've seen this before. It happened during the development, perhaps wrong agitation, deposit on the reel, tank or something else?

This is to constant for a light leak, perhaps the developer could not reach the sides of the film.
_________________

Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
http://www.algarve-photo.com/contax/

[marty]

It looks definitely a light leak. Check the light traps around film door. A leak in the developing tank seems far less probable though not impossible.

Cheers, Marty.
_________________
Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4

[marty]

[Carlsson]

Found a sample image. One of my very first developments. The camera was fine, no leaks.
Developer (Tetenal Superfin) was nearly 10 years old, but the bottle was unopened until the development.


_________________

Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
http://www.algarve-photo.com/contax/

[martinsmith99]

It's not a light leak as the camera (Chinon CE-3) had new seals in a couple of months ago and has had numerous rolls through it since.

This was my 1st attempt with Rodinal and also stirring rather than inverting.
_________________
Martin - Moderator

MF Lenses User Real Names (add yours)
MF Lenses User Self Pics (add yours)
Gear: Canon EOS 5Dmkii, EOS 50 & 620, T90, AE-1 SLRs, FED2, Zorki6 & Canonette QL17 Giii RFs and stacks of lenses
ms-imaging
My Blog
My Flickr
Old Lens Fanatics Facebook Group

[Katastrofo]

Other than that, it's not a bad picture of a tree, Martin! Try Barry's
2-Bath, so cheap to make, and temperature friendly. Thinking about
ordering some Diafine for the same reason and gives tight grain, and
you can dev rolls of various ISO together as the dev time is the same
for all.

[Esox lucius]

I got this type of light leaks when I shot my friend's Hasselblad. Light leaks were not from camera, but from a roll that was not wound tight enough around the spool and then subjected to light when removed from camera.
_________________
Vilhelm

Click links in signature for sample photos in large size

Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 55/2.8 Ai-S, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5P, 105/2.5 Ai, 105/4 Ai Micro, 135/2.8Q, 135/2.8 Ai-S, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 28-300/3.5-5.6G VR, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4D, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR II
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 10-24/3.5-4.5G, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G, 18-105/3.5-5.6G VR
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 70/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180

On Fuji film: Velvia, Provia, Reala, Neopan
On Ilford film: PanF, Delta, XP2, SFX, HP4
On Kodak film: Ektachrome, Portra

[Sevo]

Stirring? Is that a tray-developed sheet, or were you using some non-inversible (daylight loading or ancient) tank? In any case, you should revise your agitation method, the flaw positively looks like as if the exchange between fresh and depleted developer towards the inner area of the film had not been good enough.
_________________
Sevo

[martinsmith99]

[F16SUNSHINE]

Stirring has worked well for me.
Spin the tool with some attitude both clockwise and counter clockwise.
Gentle is for the uh .. other dark room
_________________
Moderator

[Excalibur]

[martinsmith99]

I used the camera again and processed a film without these problems occuring but used inversions instead. I probably was not using enough force when stirring.
_________________
Martin - Moderator

MF Lenses User Real Names (add yours)
MF Lenses User Self Pics (add yours)
Gear: Canon EOS 5Dmkii, EOS 50 & 620, T90, AE-1 SLRs, FED2, Zorki6 & Canonette QL17 Giii RFs and stacks of lenses
ms-imaging
My Blog
My Flickr
Old Lens Fanatics Facebook Group