Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch|Quick search    MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Vivitar Series 1 24-48mm f/3.8 tests

 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Focus Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cooltouch



Level 4

Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 6629
Location: Houston, Texas


PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:20 am    Post subject: Vivitar Series 1 24-48mm f/3.8 tests Reply with quote

Okay, as promised, I shot some test pics yesterday to evaluate my Vivitar Series 1 24-48mm f/3.8 that I bought about a month ago. It's in Canon FD mount, so previously I was only able to evaluate it shooting film. Unfortunately, the best film I had available for the evaluations was some ISO 200, which is too grainy to evaluate lens sharpness. About a week ago, I decided to buy a FD-EOS adapter with the glass element since I've seen some reports that indicate that one can achieve good results with it. So, I've used this adapter with the lens and my EOS DSLR for the evaluation. I've found that the adapter works very well with most lenses once they are stopped down to f/4 or so. Wider than that, there is quite a bit of flare.

This adapter also acts as a mild teleconverter, providing about 1.25x magnification. So, with the 1.6x crop factor added to the adapter's magnification factor, the focal length of the lens is about doubled. So this means that my tests are only meaningful, in terms of sharpness, when observing center sharpness, since the corners when used with an FF camera are not even close to being within the field of view with my setup.

Flare caused by the adapter with this lens wide open is noticeable, but not too bad, since its max aperture is only f/3.8. The following close-up photos were taken at f/3.8 and f/8. I used a small amount of contrast enhancement to remove a slight bit of hazy softness caused by the flare at f/3.8. No sharpness routines were used.

The photos are boring, but I'm shooting for detail, not visual interest. The subject is a storage barn in our backyard. The first two photos were taken from about 10 meters distance from the barn.

24mm @ f/8


48mm @ f/8


24mm @ f/3.8


24mm @ f/8


48mm @ f/3.8


48mm @ f/8


The photos are actually sharper than they seem to indicate. I need to do some 100% crops to show this. Too late to mess with it tonight. Maybe I'll post some tomorrow.
_________________
Michael

My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/


Last edited by cooltouch on Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:22 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
martinsmith99



Level 4

Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6678
Location: S Glos, UK

Expire: 2013-11-18

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks a very usable lens to me! Not bad for an old zoom is it.
_________________
Martin - Coincidental Thread Killer

MF Lenses User Real Names (add yours)
MF Lenses User Self Pics (add yours)
Gear: Canon EOS 5Dmkii, EOS 50 & 620, T90, AE-1 SLRs, FED2, Zorki6 & Canonette QL17 Giii RFs and stacks of lenses
ms-imaging
My Blog
My Flickr
Old Lens Fanatics Facebook Group
Cynthia Pictures
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  No rate
Share
Excalibur



Level 4

Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 4738
Location: UK

Expire: 2014-04-21

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be better to test the lens without the adapter?
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1 & C35, Minolta X-700, X-300, SRT101b and AFZ, Nikon L35ad, RF2, EM, N2000 and F401, F90X, Olympus Om20 & OM2, Pentax S3, Praktica MTL3, TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony DSC-P92
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from crap to excellent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
cooltouch



Level 4

Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 6629
Location: Houston, Texas


PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, it would. But I don't own a DLSR that I can use it on to test it using digital format. I've already tested it using Kodak Gold ISO 200, and the grain clumps up before the resolution limit is reached. Actually, I've found with this lens and all my other FD-mount lenses, that center sharpness is still very high. So, I don't think it has much of an effect in that regard.

I should probably get a glass-less adapter also. The lenses will be of limited usefulness, but I can still do accurate resolution tests with them.
_________________
Michael

My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
cooltouch



Level 4

Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 6629
Location: Houston, Texas


PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, here are some 100% crops of the above close-ups. It was late afternoon and I was losing light. I was too lazy to drag out a tripod, so I bumped up the ISO instead. The pics were taken at ISO 400, and the noise is pretty obvious at 100%.

@ 24mm f/3.8


@ 24mm f/8


@ 48mm f/3.8


@ 48mm f/8


There is a noticeable difference in sharpness at 48mm between the two pictures. I think this is most likely due to human error than the lens or the adapter. I probably just missed on the focus slightly.

Here are 100% crops of the full shots of the barn. The point of focus for both images was the blue-and white porcelain flower pot.

@ 24mm f/8


@ 48mm f/8


Overall, I would rate the picture quality of this lens as 'good.' Not great, but a solid, good performer. To be most accurate, however, will require that I use some very fine grain slide film or buy an adapter with no glass for my EOS DSLR.
_________________
Michael

My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Focus Lenses All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group