 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Attila


Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 52462 Location: Budapest,Hungary
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:54 pm Post subject: To use protection filters or not ? |
|
|
Please let me know what you think about protection filters like UV. Should I use them always or just if really need it. They affect picture quality or not. _________________ Attila - admin --- BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic - FOMAPAN on forum - Webshop EU
Items on sale on Ebay
35mm: Konica A4, Konica IIIA, Konica FC-1
MF: Konica Pearl I,II,III 6x4,5 Konica Semi Pearl
Film: Foma,Kodak, Fuji DIY development C41, FOMA LQR
Scan: Epson V500, scanassist (http://www.scanassist.org)
Shutter tester: LCD tester from member vfmoto
Digital: Panasonic G1, Sony Nex-3, Samsung NX100
Lenses: Konica Hexanons,Carl Zeiss,Carl Zeiss Jena,Meyer-Optik,Minolta MD,Yashica ML,Nikon,Olympus OM
DIY E-6,C41 and B&W
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lahnet


Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 1170 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: To use protection filters or not ? |
|
|
| Attila wrote: | | Please let me know what you think about protection filters like UV. Should I use them always or just if really need it. They affect picture quality or not. |
I believe that every piece of glass are affecting the quality of the picture in some way.
If you want the effekt you should of couse use them. But when it comes to UV filters I dont think they have any effekt besides reducing scarpness.
On film cameras it is another matter.
I use UV filters when needed only for protecting use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila


Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 52462 Location: Budapest,Hungary
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sometimes I shoot with really dirty, scratched old lenses, seem if front lens damaged only that is not impact the picture quality. This says to me should no problem to use all time UV filters. _________________ Attila - admin --- BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic - FOMAPAN on forum - Webshop EU
Items on sale on Ebay
35mm: Konica A4, Konica IIIA, Konica FC-1
MF: Konica Pearl I,II,III 6x4,5 Konica Semi Pearl
Film: Foma,Kodak, Fuji DIY development C41, FOMA LQR
Scan: Epson V500, scanassist (http://www.scanassist.org)
Shutter tester: LCD tester from member vfmoto
Digital: Panasonic G1, Sony Nex-3, Samsung NX100
Lenses: Konica Hexanons,Carl Zeiss,Carl Zeiss Jena,Meyer-Optik,Minolta MD,Yashica ML,Nikon,Olympus OM
DIY E-6,C41 and B&W
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd


Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7601 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:04 pm Post subject: Re: To use protection filters or not ? |
|
|
| lahnet wrote: | | Attila wrote: | | Please let me know what you think about protection filters like UV. Should I use them always or just if really need it. They affect picture quality or not. |
I believe that every piece of glass are affecting the quality of the picture in some way.
If you want the effekt you should of couse use them. But when it comes to UV filters I dont think they have any effekt besides reducing scarpness.
On film cameras it is another matter.
I use UV filters when needed only for protecting use. |
I completely agree. I have a few Sky or plain filters just for protection, but I mostly take them off with the lens cap when I take a picture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila


Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 52462 Location: Budapest,Hungary
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To store them with protection filter make higher risk to get fungus if you have humid area. _________________ Attila - admin --- BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic - FOMAPAN on forum - Webshop EU
Items on sale on Ebay
35mm: Konica A4, Konica IIIA, Konica FC-1
MF: Konica Pearl I,II,III 6x4,5 Konica Semi Pearl
Film: Foma,Kodak, Fuji DIY development C41, FOMA LQR
Scan: Epson V500, scanassist (http://www.scanassist.org)
Shutter tester: LCD tester from member vfmoto
Digital: Panasonic G1, Sony Nex-3, Samsung NX100
Lenses: Konica Hexanons,Carl Zeiss,Carl Zeiss Jena,Meyer-Optik,Minolta MD,Yashica ML,Nikon,Olympus OM
DIY E-6,C41 and B&W
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Super Tak

Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used to use protection filters but never do any more, I remember reading "proof" that they degraded the image, I'm not so sure about that but I don't miss them so I haven't gone back. _________________ Panasonic G1 | Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 ASPH | Jupiter-8 50mm f/2 | Nikkor 200mm f/4 AI
If you believe everything you read, then you had better stop reading. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bob955i

Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Where possible I use a suitable hood rather than a protection filter although for some of the Canon 'L' zooms you do need to fit a filter to complete the water/dust proofing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LucisPictor


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 16497 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you use an additional glass in front of a lens, you (or better the additional glass-air-glass-system) will affect the picture quality, without any doubt. It will end in reduced sharpness or contrast (the latter is also true for your scratched lenses, Attila, but often only to such a small degree that you hardly notice it, only in direct comparison).
Nevertheless, I also constantly use UV-filters as a protection on lenses that were expensive and that still have an immaculate front lens.
It is much cheaper to replace a filter.
I scratched a filter badly once and believe me, I was very happy that I had this filter!
With some of my lenses (the rather cheaper ones or some lenses that already have some "spots" or cleaning marks at the front element), I don't bother. With those I only use a filter in kind of "harsh" surroundings, at the sea (sandy beach, wind and sea water spray), for example.
What I try to use is a hood, if I have an appropriate one, that is... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause!
Carsten, Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
Sets:
Leica M8 - Voigtländer Heliar 4.5/15 & Ultron 2/28 & Ultron 1.7/35 & Heliar 2.5/75, Leica Summitar 2/50 & Elmar 4/90, Jupiter-3, Jupiter-8,
Sony NEX-7 / NEX-3 - Tamron 2.5/24, Pentax-110 2.8 (18/24/50/70), Fujian CCTV 1.7/35, Hexanon 1.8/40 & 1.4/57, Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75, Zuiko 2.8/100, Leica Hektor 4.5/135, Sony SEL 2.8/16 & 18-55 OSS & 55-210 OSS, Sigma EX 2.8/19 & 2.8/30
Canon EOS 5D - Zenitar 2.8/16, Rokkor 2/28, Summicron-R 2.0/50, Nikkor-SC 1.2/55, Nikkor 1.8/85, Tamron 2.5/135, Elmar 4/180, Tamron 8/500,
Tamron 2.8-3.8/35-80, Sigma EX 15-30, Sigma 1.8/24, Canon EF 1.8/50, Tokina AT-X Pro 24-200 (EOS), Sigma 70-300
Canon EOS 300D - Steinheil 2.8/35, Zuiko 1.4/50, Helios-44 2/58, Jupiter-9 2/85, Vivitar S1 2.3/135
Nikon D1 & Fuji S2 Pro - Tamron 2.5/28, MIR 2/35, Jupiter-37 3.5/135, Soligor 3.5/70-220, Tamron 18-200
Nikon D3100 - Nikkor AF-S 18-55VR, AF-S 18-70, AF-S 55-200
Ricoh KR10x - Pentax-M 1.7/50, Rikenon 3.4-4.5/35-70
Nikon F - Nikkor 2.8/24, Nikkor-SC 1.4/50 a.s.a.
Asahi Spotmatic SPII: CZJ Flek 4/20, Tamron 3.5/35-70, Industar 3.5/5cm, Mamiya 1.8/55
EXA Varex - CZJ Biogon 2/58
Leica IIIa syn & Zorki-4 - (LTM lenses)
Leica C2, Minox 35 GL,Yashica Electro 35 GS, Kodak Retina Ia, Agfa Super Silette, Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim, Adox Golf 66 and some others...
Sigma DP1s, Leica Digilux 2, Lumix LC-5 & FX37, Lumix FZ20, Canon G2, Sony Mavica 300, Fuji 4800Z + 4900Z, Oly C3030, Pentax Optio S, Nikon CP950, Sony V1 & F505 a.s.m.
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://lucispictor.weebly.com | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
naplam


Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 469 Location: Spain
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A good uv filter is not noticeable at all in normal conditions. Picture "quality" is subjective. If you can't tell the difference, then there's no difference.
But if you're shooting against a window and/or at night when there are just several spots of light and total darkness elsewhere and so on, you may see some "ghosting" because of reflections. In that situations remove the filter to shoot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|