View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: [PRINT] Two new prints |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Two new prints I made tonight:
Printed on Ilford Multigrade RC IV paper
contrast at 2.0
Printed on Ilford Multigrade RC IV paper
contrast at 3.0
both images taken with Contax RX and Vario-Sonnar 35-70
film Kodak T-Max 400 developed in TMax developer
While the first print was scanned with reasonable faithfullness, the scan of the second picture is really disappointing.
The overall tones are there but where there was smooth skin gradation (like in the arm of the model), the scan created a dithering-like effect,
which I do not want, and I have no idea how to get rid of it. Images were scanned in RGB mode with 24 bit depth.
Speaking of B&W printing, I am amazed at how much difference one point in contrast can make with multigrade RC paper.
It can change completely the mood of a photograph. Much more (and better) than adjusting contrast on digital files. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html
Last edited by Orio on Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 5745 Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
I love them, Orio.
Very detailed pictures, (well composed as you use to do). It does surprise me the dynamic range you get with such wide scale of gray tones.
And also the sharpness in all the lines.
You've mastered the B&W really quick!
Regards,
Jes. _________________ Jesito, Moderator
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Ahhh shades of another time Orio. I think the scanning technology still has a long way to go, as does the camera sensor technology.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Like Jesito said: it's great to be remembered that film still has a larger dynamic range than the sensor in our DSLR's. Photos like yours make me want to go back to film (even though I haven't touched a film since 2002 or so). Great results, the first one I think has more shadow detail than my DSLR's can achieve.
Now let me please look which one of my Spotmatics has the most accurate shutter of the bunch (fortunately I have a shutter speed tester at home). Fortunately I also found my old, trusty Gossen Luna Pro meter yesterday _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lahnet
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 1164 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
lahnet wrote:
It looks so sweet.
Nothing beats the joy of having a picture on print. _________________ Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Gear list |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
great results! black is beautiful! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Stop being so good at this |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jieffe
Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 754 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jieffe wrote:
I predict a price increase on second-hand enlargers ...
Nice work, Orio. Way to go ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks guys!
I still have a lot to learn, the next session I will try some dodging and burning, at the course it was easy because there were friends to remove the red filter and start the timer, now I'll be on my own.
What makes me happy of this second session is that I have become better at predicting which result I will get with a given time and a given contrast. I wasted less paper for tests and I got the portrait picture right at the second tentative.
@ Jes: I think that if someone likes sharpness, they should try to make prints with a B&W condenser head. It really is the fiesta of detail, nothing to do with those blurry colour (or false B&W) that the labs deliver! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
You're really good... when I saw the first picture I thought 'Contax' for sure... the personality comes through strong. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
Very nice Orio. You certainly came to the front fast. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
I like them both, too, excellent duo! I know it's gonna be tough, but
try to remember us little people on your way to the top!
Would love to see the *actual* prints! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xpres
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 964 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-10-28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Xpres wrote:
I think you're nearly hooked...
Orio wrote: |
.... because there were friends to remove the red filter and start the timer, now I'll be on my own..... |
Have you thought about a foot switch? Frees up your hands! _________________ Film... and sometimes SD14, 5D2 and some other suff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Xpres: foot switch, neat idea! But I don't want to mess with my old timer - new ones cost more than 100 Euros.
@ Bill: the actual prints, are better than what the scans show _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
Like Jesito said: it's great to be remembered that film still has a larger dynamic range than the sensor in our DSLR's. Photos like yours make me want to go back to film (even though I haven't touched a film since 2002 or so). Great results, the first one I think has more shadow detail than my DSLR's can achieve.
Now let me please look which one of my Spotmatics has the most accurate shutter of the bunch (fortunately I have a shutter speed tester at home). Fortunately I also found my old, trusty Gossen Luna Pro meter yesterday |
Man, go ahead with film! Great fun! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: Two new prints |
|
|
hexi wrote:
The first one is very very good, quite detailled print. Amazing atmosphere for me. And you seem to have a cool camera as well.
i'm looking forward to do printings as well soon
great job on those |
|
Back to top |
|
|
emco
Joined: 23 Jul 2009 Posts: 38 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: Re: [PRINT] Two new prints |
|
|
emco wrote:
Orio wrote: |
(.....)
While the first print was scanned with reasonable faithfullness, the scan of the second picture is really disappointing.
The overall tones are there but where there was smooth skin gradation
(like in the arm of the model), the scan created a dithering-like effect,
which I do not want, and I have no idea how to get rid of it. Images were
scanned in RGB mode with 24 bit depth.
(....)
|
this is common scanner problem - banding.
try to scan in grayscale 16 bit/channel (also in rgb) in hightest dpi you can.
Change the position of the image (good press to glass is important).
Clean the glass.
Try to use Photoshop TWAIN protocol (Main Manu-File-Import...).
Type in your favourite search maschin this terms: model name of your
scanner and " banding problem" or "ghost problem".
Certainly there is someone in the whole world who have the same problem. I'm sure. _________________ Viste my photographic site
Viste my photographic site 2
Facebook FAN PAGE: EMCO |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|